Perceived clinician stigma and its impact on eating disorder treatment experiences: a systematic review of the lived experience literature.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Journal of Eating Disorders Pub Date : 2024-10-16 DOI:10.1186/s40337-024-01128-3
Gabriel Lubieniecki, Anne Nileshni Fernando, Alisha Randhawa, Sean Cowlishaw, Gemma Sharp
{"title":"Perceived clinician stigma and its impact on eating disorder treatment experiences: a systematic review of the lived experience literature.","authors":"Gabriel Lubieniecki, Anne Nileshni Fernando, Alisha Randhawa, Sean Cowlishaw, Gemma Sharp","doi":"10.1186/s40337-024-01128-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review examines the literature regarding perceived clinician stigma and treatment experiences of adult patients with eating disorders, emphasising lived experience perspectives.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A systematic search was conducted across MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials [CENTRAL] to identify studies published from 1 January 2000 until 24 March 2024 that explored patient experiences of clinician attitudes and behaviours in eating disorder treatment. Eligible studies included those reporting on perceived clinician stigma and impacts on treatment outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 11 studies that met the eligibility criteria. The studies encompassed various diagnoses, locations, and healthcare settings, reflecting a broad spectrum of experiences and contexts within treatment of eating disorders. Four key themes emerged across the studies: treatment engagement, where perceived clinician stigma led to reduced patient involvement; therapeutic alliances, with stigma compromising relationships between patients and healthcare providers; barriers to treatment and care, where stigma heightened obstacles to accessing support; and weight stigma.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Despite the overall scarcity of evidence, these qualitative studies provide evidence of impacts of perceived clinician stigma on patient experiences in eating disorder treatment. These findings provide an initial understanding of negative effects of clinician attitudes such as dismissiveness and invalidation, which may hinder treatment adherence and therapeutic outcomes. Beyond addressing stigma, future research should explore how clinician behaviours can foster positive treatment experiences, such as patients feeling heard, respected, and understood. Clinicians' reflective practices should focus on improving therapeutic alliances and fostering more inclusive, patient-centred care. Future studies should prioritise mixed-methods approaches to investigate how clinician stigma and positive care experiences influence treatment engagement, recovery trajectories, and long-term outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":48605,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Eating Disorders","volume":"12 1","pages":"161"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11481375/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Eating Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40337-024-01128-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This systematic review examines the literature regarding perceived clinician stigma and treatment experiences of adult patients with eating disorders, emphasising lived experience perspectives.

Method: A systematic search was conducted across MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials [CENTRAL] to identify studies published from 1 January 2000 until 24 March 2024 that explored patient experiences of clinician attitudes and behaviours in eating disorder treatment. Eligible studies included those reporting on perceived clinician stigma and impacts on treatment outcomes.

Results: There were 11 studies that met the eligibility criteria. The studies encompassed various diagnoses, locations, and healthcare settings, reflecting a broad spectrum of experiences and contexts within treatment of eating disorders. Four key themes emerged across the studies: treatment engagement, where perceived clinician stigma led to reduced patient involvement; therapeutic alliances, with stigma compromising relationships between patients and healthcare providers; barriers to treatment and care, where stigma heightened obstacles to accessing support; and weight stigma.

Discussion: Despite the overall scarcity of evidence, these qualitative studies provide evidence of impacts of perceived clinician stigma on patient experiences in eating disorder treatment. These findings provide an initial understanding of negative effects of clinician attitudes such as dismissiveness and invalidation, which may hinder treatment adherence and therapeutic outcomes. Beyond addressing stigma, future research should explore how clinician behaviours can foster positive treatment experiences, such as patients feeling heard, respected, and understood. Clinicians' reflective practices should focus on improving therapeutic alliances and fostering more inclusive, patient-centred care. Future studies should prioritise mixed-methods approaches to investigate how clinician stigma and positive care experiences influence treatment engagement, recovery trajectories, and long-term outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
感知到的临床医生污名化及其对饮食失调症治疗体验的影响:对生活体验文献的系统性回顾。
目的本系统性综述研究了有关成年进食障碍患者感知到的临床医生污名化和治疗经验的文献,强调了生活经验的视角:方法:我们在 MEDLINE、EMBASE、PsycINFO 和 Cochrane 对照试验中央注册中心 [CENTRAL]进行了系统检索,以确定 2000 年 1 月 1 日至 2024 年 3 月 24 日期间发表的、探讨患者在饮食失调治疗中对临床医生态度和行为的体验的研究。符合条件的研究包括那些报告了临床医生的污名化感知及其对治疗结果的影响的研究:共有 11 项研究符合资格标准。这些研究涵盖了不同的诊断、地点和医疗环境,反映了饮食失调症治疗过程中广泛的经验和背景。研究中出现了四个关键主题:治疗参与度,临床医生的污名化导致患者参与度降低;治疗联盟,污名化损害了患者与医疗服务提供者之间的关系;治疗和护理障碍,污名化增加了患者获得支持的障碍;以及体重污名化:讨论:尽管证据总体上比较匮乏,但这些定性研究提供了临床医生的污名感对患者饮食失调治疗经历的影响。这些研究结果让我们初步了解了临床医生态度的负面影响,如轻视和无效,这可能会阻碍治疗的坚持和治疗效果。除了解决污名化问题,未来的研究还应该探索临床医生的行为如何促进积极的治疗体验,比如让患者感到被倾听、被尊重和被理解。临床医生的反思性实践应侧重于改善治疗联盟,促进更具包容性、以患者为中心的护理。未来的研究应优先采用混合方法,调查临床医生的污名化和积极的护理体验如何影响治疗参与度、康复轨迹和长期疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Eating Disorders
Journal of Eating Disorders Neuroscience-Behavioral Neuroscience
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
17.10%
发文量
161
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Eating Disorders is the first open access, peer-reviewed journal publishing leading research in the science and clinical practice of eating disorders. It disseminates research that provides answers to the important issues and key challenges in the field of eating disorders and to facilitate translation of evidence into practice. The journal publishes research on all aspects of eating disorders namely their epidemiology, nature, determinants, neurobiology, prevention, treatment and outcomes. The scope includes, but is not limited to anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, binge eating disorder and other eating disorders. Related areas such as important co-morbidities, obesity, body image, appetite, food and eating are also included. Articles about research methodology and assessment are welcomed where they advance the field of eating disorders.
期刊最新文献
From fixing to connecting: parents' experiences supporting adult children with eating disorders. Growing up in a larger body: youth- and parent-reported triggers for illness and barriers to recovery from anorexia nervosa. Correction: The role of impulsivity and binge eating in outpatients with overweight or obesity: an EEG temporal discounting study. Muscularity-oriented disordered eating: investigating body image concerns and the moderating role of emotion dysregulation in cyclists. Neurodivergence, intersectionality, and eating disorders: a lived experience-led narrative review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1