Cancer Worry and Fatalism at the Intersection of Race and Hearing Status.

Abstract

Introduction: The deaf and hard of hearing (DHH) community experiences lower cancer screening rates than the general population. Cancer worry and fatalism can influence cancer screening, along with race, and the interaction of intrinsic factors with DHH health behavior needs to be investigated.

Objectives: The study examines the association of the intersection of race and hearing status with cancer worry and fatalism.

Methods: This study analyzed cross-sectional survey data from NCI HINTS-ASL (for DHH adults) and NCI HINTS (for hearing adults). Multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess (i) the association of race-hearing status intersection with cancer worry and fatalism, as well as (ii) the relationship between hearing status and outcomes within each race.

Results: The study found that the overall interaction between race and hearing status was significantly associated with both high cancer worry and fatalism, with African American (AA)/Black and Asian/Other having higher odds of worry [1.17 (0.83, 1.64); 1.19 (0.85, 1.66), respectively] and other groups having lower worry than White hearing (P < 0.0001), and all deaf having less concern about cancer fatalism (P < 0.0001). Within each racial group, White DHH respondents had lower odds of cancer worry [aOR (95% CI): 0.72 (0.58, 0.91); P < 0.01] and fatalism [0.55 (0.46, 0.67); P < 0.0001] compared to White hearing respondents, while DHH AA/Black [1.89 (1.06, 3.37); P = 0.03], Asian/Other [2.39 (1.06, 3.37); P = 0.03], and Hispanic [1.95 (1.18, 3.22); P < 0.01] respondents had significantly higher odds of cancer worry and lower odds of cancer fatalism [Black: 0.50 (0.23, 1.09); P = 0.07; Asian/Other: [0.68 (0.42, 1.09); P = 0.10]; Hispanic: [0.69 (0.40, 1.17)]; P = 0.16] compared to their hearing counterparts.

Conclusion: DHH individuals have different odds of experiencing cancer worry and fatalism compared to their hearing counterparts. Inclusion of individuals with sensory disabilities in a larger cancer study sample enriches the diversity of perspectives, ensuring that the findings reflect a broader range of experiences and needs. More research into contributory factors in the signing DHH population is needed.