Utilising a modified accelerated Delphi process to develop a national multidisciplinary consensus on peri-operative optimisation of patients with obesity undergoing non-bariatric surgery.

C Cullinane, A Edwards-Murphy, C Kennedy, C Toale, M Al Azzawi, M Davey, N Donlon, S Croghan, J Elliott, C Fleming
{"title":"Utilising a modified accelerated Delphi process to develop a national multidisciplinary consensus on peri-operative optimisation of patients with obesity undergoing non-bariatric surgery.","authors":"C Cullinane, A Edwards-Murphy, C Kennedy, C Toale, M Al Azzawi, M Davey, N Donlon, S Croghan, J Elliott, C Fleming","doi":"10.1016/j.surge.2024.09.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the last three decades, the worldwide prevalence of obesity has increased by threefold. Using a modified Delphi consensus technique, the Irish Surgical Research Collaborative (ISRC) aimed to formulate consensus guidelines on the peri-operative optimisation of patients with obesity undergoing non-bariatric surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Subgroups within the ISRC were established to formulate consensus statements using a nominal group technique (NGT) to address the three domains of pre-operative, intra-operative and post-operative care. Three Delphi rounds were circulated nationally to multidisciplinary members of the peri-operative team via electronic survey. Consensus was considered achieved for any statement with >80 % agreement. Data was analysed using Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corp, Redmond, WA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Following three Delphi rounds, a total of 94 statements centred around optimising peri-operative care for patients with obesity undergoing non-bariatric surgery reached consensus. Pre-operatively, access to prehabilitation, use of pre-operative risk stratification tools and strategies to reduce obesity-related co-morbidities were all deemed important along with nomination of a hospital obesity lead. Intra-operatively, the prioritised domains were involvement of consultant anaesthetist and surgeon for safe and considered patient positioning, utilisation of minimally invasive surgical techniques, adherence to venous thromboembolism prophylaxis and surgical site infection prevention strategies as well as adoption of multimodal analgesia. Appropriate analgesia prescription, nutritional support, enhanced recovery after surgery and the role of physiotherapy were all deemed essential elements of post-operative care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>As a multidisciplinary peri-operative group, through Delphi consensus, we report agreed perioperative standards to optimise the perioperative care of patients with obesity undergoing non-bariatric surgery. This consensus can be utilised to standardise clinical practice and identify areas for quality improvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":49463,"journal":{"name":"Surgeon-Journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgeon-Journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surge.2024.09.005","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In the last three decades, the worldwide prevalence of obesity has increased by threefold. Using a modified Delphi consensus technique, the Irish Surgical Research Collaborative (ISRC) aimed to formulate consensus guidelines on the peri-operative optimisation of patients with obesity undergoing non-bariatric surgery.

Methods: Subgroups within the ISRC were established to formulate consensus statements using a nominal group technique (NGT) to address the three domains of pre-operative, intra-operative and post-operative care. Three Delphi rounds were circulated nationally to multidisciplinary members of the peri-operative team via electronic survey. Consensus was considered achieved for any statement with >80 % agreement. Data was analysed using Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corp, Redmond, WA).

Results: Following three Delphi rounds, a total of 94 statements centred around optimising peri-operative care for patients with obesity undergoing non-bariatric surgery reached consensus. Pre-operatively, access to prehabilitation, use of pre-operative risk stratification tools and strategies to reduce obesity-related co-morbidities were all deemed important along with nomination of a hospital obesity lead. Intra-operatively, the prioritised domains were involvement of consultant anaesthetist and surgeon for safe and considered patient positioning, utilisation of minimally invasive surgical techniques, adherence to venous thromboembolism prophylaxis and surgical site infection prevention strategies as well as adoption of multimodal analgesia. Appropriate analgesia prescription, nutritional support, enhanced recovery after surgery and the role of physiotherapy were all deemed essential elements of post-operative care.

Conclusion: As a multidisciplinary peri-operative group, through Delphi consensus, we report agreed perioperative standards to optimise the perioperative care of patients with obesity undergoing non-bariatric surgery. This consensus can be utilised to standardise clinical practice and identify areas for quality improvement.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用改良的加速德尔菲流程,就接受非减肥手术的肥胖症患者的围手术期优化达成全国多学科共识。
背景:在过去的三十年里,全球肥胖症的发病率增加了三倍。爱尔兰外科研究合作组织(ISRC)采用改良德尔菲共识技术,旨在为接受非减肥手术的肥胖症患者制定围手术期优化共识指南:方法:爱尔兰外科研究合作组织(ISRC)内部成立了若干小组,采用名义小组技术(NGT)制定共识声明,以解决术前、术中和术后护理这三个领域的问题。在全国范围内通过电子调查向围术期团队的多学科成员分发了三轮德尔菲调查问卷。凡是达成一致意见>80%的声明均被视为已达成共识。数据使用 Microsoft Excel(Microsoft Corp,Redmond,WA)进行分析:经过三轮德尔菲讨论,围绕优化非减肥手术肥胖症患者的围手术期护理,共有 94 项声明达成了共识。术前康复、术前风险分层工具的使用、减少肥胖相关并发症的策略以及医院肥胖问题负责人的提名都被认为非常重要。在术中,优先考虑的领域包括麻醉师顾问和外科医生的参与,以确保患者体位的安全和周全、微创手术技术的使用、静脉血栓栓塞预防和手术部位感染预防策略的坚持以及多模式镇痛的采用。适当的镇痛处方、营养支持、促进术后恢复以及物理治疗的作用都被认为是术后护理的基本要素:作为一个多学科围手术期小组,通过德尔菲共识,我们报告了一致同意的围手术期标准,以优化接受非减肥手术的肥胖症患者的围手术期护理。这一共识可用于规范临床实践和确定质量改进的领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
158
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Since its establishment in 2003, The Surgeon has established itself as one of the leading multidisciplinary surgical titles, both in print and online. The Surgeon is published for the worldwide surgical and dental communities. The goal of the Journal is to achieve wider national and international recognition, through a commitment to excellence in original research. In addition, both Colleges see the Journal as an important educational service, and consequently there is a particular focus on post-graduate development. Much of our educational role will continue to be achieved through publishing expanded review articles by leaders in their field. Articles in related areas to surgery and dentistry, such as healthcare management and education, are also welcomed. We aim to educate, entertain, give insight into new surgical techniques and technology, and provide a forum for debate and discussion.
期刊最新文献
Enhancements in artificial intelligence for medical examinations: A leap from ChatGPT 3.5 to ChatGPT 4.0 in the FRCS trauma & orthopaedics examination. A boost to concentration or a distracting noise? A systematic review of surgeon and anaesthetist perspectives of the benefit of intra-operative music. List of editors Surgeon ability to predict physical activity and sedentary time: Comparison of self-reported and measured activity Sensitivity and specificity of surgeons' intra-operative diagnosis of appendicitis. A systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1