Evaluating deep learning techniques for optimal neurons counting and characterization in complex neuronal cultures.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing Pub Date : 2024-10-17 DOI:10.1007/s11517-024-03202-z
Angel Rio-Alvarez, Pablo García Marcos, Paula Puerta González, Esther Serrano-Pertierra, Antonello Novelli, M Teresa Fernández-Sánchez, Víctor M González
{"title":"Evaluating deep learning techniques for optimal neurons counting and characterization in complex neuronal cultures.","authors":"Angel Rio-Alvarez, Pablo García Marcos, Paula Puerta González, Esther Serrano-Pertierra, Antonello Novelli, M Teresa Fernández-Sánchez, Víctor M González","doi":"10.1007/s11517-024-03202-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The counting and characterization of neurons in primary cultures have long been areas of significant scientific interest due to their multifaceted applications, ranging from neuronal viability assessment to the study of neuronal development. Traditional methods, often relying on fluorescence or colorimetric staining and manual segmentation, are time consuming, labor intensive, and prone to error, raising the need for the development of automated and reliable methods. This paper delves into the evaluation of three pivotal deep learning techniques: semantic segmentation, which allows for pixel-level classification and is solely suited for characterization; object detection, which focuses on counting and locating neurons; and instance segmentation, which amalgamates the features of the other two but employing more intricate structures. The goal of this research is to discern what technique or combination of those techniques yields the optimal results for automatic counting and characterization of neurons in images of neuronal cultures. Following rigorous experimentation, we conclude that instance segmentation stands out, providing superior outcomes for both challenges.</p>","PeriodicalId":49840,"journal":{"name":"Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-024-03202-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The counting and characterization of neurons in primary cultures have long been areas of significant scientific interest due to their multifaceted applications, ranging from neuronal viability assessment to the study of neuronal development. Traditional methods, often relying on fluorescence or colorimetric staining and manual segmentation, are time consuming, labor intensive, and prone to error, raising the need for the development of automated and reliable methods. This paper delves into the evaluation of three pivotal deep learning techniques: semantic segmentation, which allows for pixel-level classification and is solely suited for characterization; object detection, which focuses on counting and locating neurons; and instance segmentation, which amalgamates the features of the other two but employing more intricate structures. The goal of this research is to discern what technique or combination of those techniques yields the optimal results for automatic counting and characterization of neurons in images of neuronal cultures. Following rigorous experimentation, we conclude that instance segmentation stands out, providing superior outcomes for both challenges.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估深度学习技术,以优化复杂神经元培养物中的神经元计数和特征描述。
由于神经元的多方面应用,从神经元活力评估到神经元发育研究,原代培养物中神经元的计数和表征一直是科学界非常关注的领域。传统方法通常依赖荧光或比色染色和人工分割,费时费力且容易出错,因此需要开发自动化的可靠方法。本文深入探讨了对三种关键深度学习技术的评估:语义分割,可进行像素级分类,仅适用于表征;对象检测,侧重于计数和定位神经元;实例分割,综合了其他两种技术的特点,但采用了更复杂的结构。本研究的目标是找出哪种技术或技术组合能产生最佳结果,以实现神经元培养图像中神经元的自动计数和特征描述。经过严格的实验,我们得出结论:实例分割技术脱颖而出,为这两项挑战提供了卓越的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.10%
发文量
249
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1963, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing (MBEC) continues to serve the biomedical engineering community, covering the entire spectrum of biomedical and clinical engineering. The journal presents exciting and vital experimental and theoretical developments in biomedical science and technology, and reports on advances in computer-based methodologies in these multidisciplinary subjects. The journal also incorporates new and evolving technologies including cellular engineering and molecular imaging. MBEC publishes original research articles as well as reviews and technical notes. Its Rapid Communications category focuses on material of immediate value to the readership, while the Controversies section provides a forum to exchange views on selected issues, stimulating a vigorous and informed debate in this exciting and high profile field. MBEC is an official journal of the International Federation of Medical and Biological Engineering (IFMBE).
期刊最新文献
Multi-file dynamic compression method based on classification algorithm in DNA storage. Continuous mobile measurement of camptocormia angle using four accelerometers. Modeling and control of COVID-19 disease using deep reinforcement learning method. Left ventricle diastolic vortex ring characterization in ischemic cardiomyopathy: insight into atrio-ventricular interplay. DNN-BP: a novel framework for cuffless blood pressure measurement from optimal PPG features using deep learning model.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1