Heterogeneity in cognitive profiles of monolingual and bilingual Hispanic/Latino older adults in HABS-HD.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-10-21 DOI:10.1017/S1355617724000547
Alexandra L Clark, Anny Reyes, Jordana Breton, Melissa Petersen, Sid O'Bryant, Stephanie M Grasso
{"title":"Heterogeneity in cognitive profiles of monolingual and bilingual Hispanic/Latino older adults in HABS-HD.","authors":"Alexandra L Clark, Anny Reyes, Jordana Breton, Melissa Petersen, Sid O'Bryant, Stephanie M Grasso","doi":"10.1017/S1355617724000547","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The present study characterized heterogeneity in the cognitive profiles of monolingual and bilingual Latino older adults enrolled in the HABS-HD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 859 cognitively unimpaired older adults completed neuropsychological testing. Raw scores for cognitive tests were converted to <i>z</i>-scores adjusted for age, education, sex, and language of testing. A latent profile analysis (LPA) was conducted for monolingual and bilingual speaker groups. A series of 2-5 class solutions were examined, and the optimal model was selected based on fit indices, posterior probabilities, proportion of sample sizes, and pattern of scores. Identified classes were compared on sociodemographic, psychosocial, and health characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the monolingual group (<i>n</i> = 365), a 3-class solution was optimal; this consisted of a <i>Low Average Memory</i> group with low average verbal memory performances on the SEVLT Total Learning and Delayed Recall trials, as well as an <i>Average Cognition</i> group and a <i>High Average Cognition</i> group. For the bilingual group (<i>n</i> = 494), a 3-class solution was observed to be optimal; this consisted of a <i>Low Average Memory</i> group, with low average verbal memory performances on the learning and delayed recall trials of Logical Memory; a <i>Low Average Executive</i> group, where performance on Trails A and B and Digit Substitution were the lowest; and a <i>High Average Cognition</i> group, where performance was generally in the high average range across most cognitive measures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Cognitive class solutions differed across monolingual and bilingual groups and illustrate the need to better understand cognitive variability in linguistically diverse samples of Latino older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617724000547","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The present study characterized heterogeneity in the cognitive profiles of monolingual and bilingual Latino older adults enrolled in the HABS-HD.

Methods: A total of 859 cognitively unimpaired older adults completed neuropsychological testing. Raw scores for cognitive tests were converted to z-scores adjusted for age, education, sex, and language of testing. A latent profile analysis (LPA) was conducted for monolingual and bilingual speaker groups. A series of 2-5 class solutions were examined, and the optimal model was selected based on fit indices, posterior probabilities, proportion of sample sizes, and pattern of scores. Identified classes were compared on sociodemographic, psychosocial, and health characteristics.

Results: For the monolingual group (n = 365), a 3-class solution was optimal; this consisted of a Low Average Memory group with low average verbal memory performances on the SEVLT Total Learning and Delayed Recall trials, as well as an Average Cognition group and a High Average Cognition group. For the bilingual group (n = 494), a 3-class solution was observed to be optimal; this consisted of a Low Average Memory group, with low average verbal memory performances on the learning and delayed recall trials of Logical Memory; a Low Average Executive group, where performance on Trails A and B and Digit Substitution were the lowest; and a High Average Cognition group, where performance was generally in the high average range across most cognitive measures.

Conclusions: Cognitive class solutions differed across monolingual and bilingual groups and illustrate the need to better understand cognitive variability in linguistically diverse samples of Latino older adults.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
HABS-HD中单语和双语西班牙裔/拉美裔老年人认知特征的异质性。
目的:本研究描述了参加 HABS-HD 的单语和双语拉丁裔老年人认知特征的异质性:本研究描述了参加 HABS-HD 的单语和双语拉丁裔老年人认知特征的异质性:共有 859 名认知能力未受损的老年人完成了神经心理学测试。认知测试的原始分数经年龄、教育程度、性别和测试语言调整后转换为 z 分数。对单语组和双语组进行了潜在特征分析(LPA)。根据拟合指数、后验概率、样本大小比例和分数模式,对一系列 2-5 类解决方案进行了检验,并选出了最佳模型。对确定的类别进行了社会人口、社会心理和健康特征方面的比较:对于单语组(n = 365),3 个类别的解决方案是最佳的;这包括在 SEVLT 总学习和延迟回忆试验中平均口头记忆表现较低的低平均记忆组,以及平均认知组和高平均认知组。对于双语组(n = 494),观察到最佳的三类解决方案是:低平均记忆组,在逻辑记忆的学习和延迟回忆试验中的平均言语记忆表现较低;低平均执行组,在路径 A 和 B 以及数字替换中的表现最低;以及高平均认知组,在大多数认知测量中的表现通常处于高平均值范围:单语组和双语组的认知等级解决方案各不相同,说明有必要更好地了解拉丁裔老年人语言多样性样本的认知变异性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1