Alexandra L Clark, Anny Reyes, Jordana Breton, Melissa Petersen, Sid O'Bryant, Stephanie M Grasso
{"title":"Heterogeneity in cognitive profiles of monolingual and bilingual Hispanic/Latino older adults in HABS-HD.","authors":"Alexandra L Clark, Anny Reyes, Jordana Breton, Melissa Petersen, Sid O'Bryant, Stephanie M Grasso","doi":"10.1017/S1355617724000547","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The present study characterized heterogeneity in the cognitive profiles of monolingual and bilingual Latino older adults enrolled in the HABS-HD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 859 cognitively unimpaired older adults completed neuropsychological testing. Raw scores for cognitive tests were converted to <i>z</i>-scores adjusted for age, education, sex, and language of testing. A latent profile analysis (LPA) was conducted for monolingual and bilingual speaker groups. A series of 2-5 class solutions were examined, and the optimal model was selected based on fit indices, posterior probabilities, proportion of sample sizes, and pattern of scores. Identified classes were compared on sociodemographic, psychosocial, and health characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the monolingual group (<i>n</i> = 365), a 3-class solution was optimal; this consisted of a <i>Low Average Memory</i> group with low average verbal memory performances on the SEVLT Total Learning and Delayed Recall trials, as well as an <i>Average Cognition</i> group and a <i>High Average Cognition</i> group. For the bilingual group (<i>n</i> = 494), a 3-class solution was observed to be optimal; this consisted of a <i>Low Average Memory</i> group, with low average verbal memory performances on the learning and delayed recall trials of Logical Memory; a <i>Low Average Executive</i> group, where performance on Trails A and B and Digit Substitution were the lowest; and a <i>High Average Cognition</i> group, where performance was generally in the high average range across most cognitive measures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Cognitive class solutions differed across monolingual and bilingual groups and illustrate the need to better understand cognitive variability in linguistically diverse samples of Latino older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617724000547","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: The present study characterized heterogeneity in the cognitive profiles of monolingual and bilingual Latino older adults enrolled in the HABS-HD.
Methods: A total of 859 cognitively unimpaired older adults completed neuropsychological testing. Raw scores for cognitive tests were converted to z-scores adjusted for age, education, sex, and language of testing. A latent profile analysis (LPA) was conducted for monolingual and bilingual speaker groups. A series of 2-5 class solutions were examined, and the optimal model was selected based on fit indices, posterior probabilities, proportion of sample sizes, and pattern of scores. Identified classes were compared on sociodemographic, psychosocial, and health characteristics.
Results: For the monolingual group (n = 365), a 3-class solution was optimal; this consisted of a Low Average Memory group with low average verbal memory performances on the SEVLT Total Learning and Delayed Recall trials, as well as an Average Cognition group and a High Average Cognition group. For the bilingual group (n = 494), a 3-class solution was observed to be optimal; this consisted of a Low Average Memory group, with low average verbal memory performances on the learning and delayed recall trials of Logical Memory; a Low Average Executive group, where performance on Trails A and B and Digit Substitution were the lowest; and a High Average Cognition group, where performance was generally in the high average range across most cognitive measures.
Conclusions: Cognitive class solutions differed across monolingual and bilingual groups and illustrate the need to better understand cognitive variability in linguistically diverse samples of Latino older adults.