{"title":"Quantifying Medical Waste at a Veterans Affairs Operating Room.","authors":"Fatima Khambaty, Parini Shah, Juliette Brody","doi":"10.1089/lap.2024.0338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Medical waste is an environmental, financial, and administrative burden to the health care system. Attempts to decrease waste should begin by quantifying the amount of waste at an individual facility. This study attempts to quantify the amount of medical waste associated with operative cases at an urban Veterans Affairs Medical Center (VAMC). <b><i>Methods:</i></b> The study was a prospective of analysis of surplus equipment and supplies accumulated by a single surgical team over a 6-week period from a VAMC operating room. The equipment and supplies were counted and weighed. The cost of the most common items was calculated using standard procurement values. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Overall, there were 81 pieces of surplus equipment and 1122 pieces of surplus medical supplies. The most common piece of equipment was a towel clip, and the most common medical supply was a blue towel. The total weight of the equipment was 72.2 kg. The five most common items were blue towels, suture, gloves, gowns, and gauze pads. Based on standard pricing, the individual price for each of the five above items was $1.32, $1.84, $4.05, $5.74, and $0.13, respectively. Over the 6-week period, the total cost of the five most common items was $1,764.56. Finally, the total weight of the surplus items was 72.2 kg. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Operative waste includes equipment and supplies that increase time, effort, and costs. Quantifying the waste allows each facility the opportunity to introduce potential strategies to reduce extraneous medical equipment and supplies.</p>","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":" ","pages":"976-979"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2024.0338","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Medical waste is an environmental, financial, and administrative burden to the health care system. Attempts to decrease waste should begin by quantifying the amount of waste at an individual facility. This study attempts to quantify the amount of medical waste associated with operative cases at an urban Veterans Affairs Medical Center (VAMC). Methods: The study was a prospective of analysis of surplus equipment and supplies accumulated by a single surgical team over a 6-week period from a VAMC operating room. The equipment and supplies were counted and weighed. The cost of the most common items was calculated using standard procurement values. Results: Overall, there were 81 pieces of surplus equipment and 1122 pieces of surplus medical supplies. The most common piece of equipment was a towel clip, and the most common medical supply was a blue towel. The total weight of the equipment was 72.2 kg. The five most common items were blue towels, suture, gloves, gowns, and gauze pads. Based on standard pricing, the individual price for each of the five above items was $1.32, $1.84, $4.05, $5.74, and $0.13, respectively. Over the 6-week period, the total cost of the five most common items was $1,764.56. Finally, the total weight of the surplus items was 72.2 kg. Conclusions: Operative waste includes equipment and supplies that increase time, effort, and costs. Quantifying the waste allows each facility the opportunity to introduce potential strategies to reduce extraneous medical equipment and supplies.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques (JLAST) is the leading international peer-reviewed journal for practicing surgeons who want to keep up with the latest thinking and advanced surgical technologies in laparoscopy, endoscopy, NOTES, and robotics. The Journal is ideally suited to surgeons who are early adopters of new technology and techniques. Recognizing that many new technologies and techniques have significant overlap with several surgical specialties, JLAST is the first journal to focus on these topics both in general and pediatric surgery, and includes other surgical subspecialties such as: urology, gynecologic surgery, thoracic surgery, and more.