Quantifying Medical Waste at a Veterans Affairs Operating Room.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-21 DOI:10.1089/lap.2024.0338
Fatima Khambaty, Parini Shah, Juliette Brody
{"title":"Quantifying Medical Waste at a Veterans Affairs Operating Room.","authors":"Fatima Khambaty, Parini Shah, Juliette Brody","doi":"10.1089/lap.2024.0338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Medical waste is an environmental, financial, and administrative burden to the health care system. Attempts to decrease waste should begin by quantifying the amount of waste at an individual facility. This study attempts to quantify the amount of medical waste associated with operative cases at an urban Veterans Affairs Medical Center (VAMC). <b><i>Methods:</i></b> The study was a prospective of analysis of surplus equipment and supplies accumulated by a single surgical team over a 6-week period from a VAMC operating room. The equipment and supplies were counted and weighed. The cost of the most common items was calculated using standard procurement values. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Overall, there were 81 pieces of surplus equipment and 1122 pieces of surplus medical supplies. The most common piece of equipment was a towel clip, and the most common medical supply was a blue towel. The total weight of the equipment was 72.2 kg. The five most common items were blue towels, suture, gloves, gowns, and gauze pads. Based on standard pricing, the individual price for each of the five above items was $1.32, $1.84, $4.05, $5.74, and $0.13, respectively. Over the 6-week period, the total cost of the five most common items was $1,764.56. Finally, the total weight of the surplus items was 72.2 kg. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Operative waste includes equipment and supplies that increase time, effort, and costs. Quantifying the waste allows each facility the opportunity to introduce potential strategies to reduce extraneous medical equipment and supplies.</p>","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":" ","pages":"976-979"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2024.0338","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Medical waste is an environmental, financial, and administrative burden to the health care system. Attempts to decrease waste should begin by quantifying the amount of waste at an individual facility. This study attempts to quantify the amount of medical waste associated with operative cases at an urban Veterans Affairs Medical Center (VAMC). Methods: The study was a prospective of analysis of surplus equipment and supplies accumulated by a single surgical team over a 6-week period from a VAMC operating room. The equipment and supplies were counted and weighed. The cost of the most common items was calculated using standard procurement values. Results: Overall, there were 81 pieces of surplus equipment and 1122 pieces of surplus medical supplies. The most common piece of equipment was a towel clip, and the most common medical supply was a blue towel. The total weight of the equipment was 72.2 kg. The five most common items were blue towels, suture, gloves, gowns, and gauze pads. Based on standard pricing, the individual price for each of the five above items was $1.32, $1.84, $4.05, $5.74, and $0.13, respectively. Over the 6-week period, the total cost of the five most common items was $1,764.56. Finally, the total weight of the surplus items was 72.2 kg. Conclusions: Operative waste includes equipment and supplies that increase time, effort, and costs. Quantifying the waste allows each facility the opportunity to introduce potential strategies to reduce extraneous medical equipment and supplies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
退伍军人事务部手术室医疗废物量化。
导言:医疗废物是医疗系统在环境、财务和管理方面的负担。要减少浪费,首先应量化各医疗机构的浪费量。本研究试图量化城市退伍军人事务医疗中心(VAMC)与手术病例相关的医疗废物量。方法:该研究对退伍军人事务医疗中心手术室的一个手术团队在 6 周内积累的剩余设备和用品进行了前瞻性分析。对设备和用品进行了清点和称重。最常见物品的成本按照标准采购值计算。结果:总共有 81 件剩余设备和 1122 件剩余医疗用品。最常见的设备是毛巾夹,最常见的医疗用品是蓝色毛巾。设备总重 72.2 千克。最常见的五种物品是蓝色毛巾、缝合线、手套、手术服和纱布垫。根据标准定价,上述五种物品的单价分别为 1.32 美元、1.84 美元、4.05 美元、5.74 美元和 0.13 美元。在 6 周的时间里,五种最常见物品的总费用为 1 764.56 美元。最后,剩余物品的总重量为 72.2 千克。结论手术浪费包括增加时间、精力和成本的设备和用品。对浪费进行量化可以让每家医疗机构有机会采用潜在的策略来减少多余的医疗设备和用品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
163
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques (JLAST) is the leading international peer-reviewed journal for practicing surgeons who want to keep up with the latest thinking and advanced surgical technologies in laparoscopy, endoscopy, NOTES, and robotics. The Journal is ideally suited to surgeons who are early adopters of new technology and techniques. Recognizing that many new technologies and techniques have significant overlap with several surgical specialties, JLAST is the first journal to focus on these topics both in general and pediatric surgery, and includes other surgical subspecialties such as: urology, gynecologic surgery, thoracic surgery, and more.
期刊最新文献
Application of Intraoperative Ultrasound in Laparoscopic Liver Resection with Pringle Maneuver: A Comparative Study with the Pringle Maneuver. Short-Term Efficacy of LCBDE+LC Versus ERCP/EST+LC in the Treatment of Cholelithiasis Combined with Common Bile Duct Stones: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Evaluation of Surgical Results and Effectiveness of Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal and Laparoscopic Totally Extraperitoneal Approaches in Bilateral Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Randomized Analysis. Is Endoscopic Resection Essential for Patients with Type 1 Gastric Neuroendocrine Tumor? Is It Necessary to Endoscopically Evaluate the Anastomosis in Robotic or Laparoscopic Surgical Procedures for Colorectal Cancer?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1