Term Breech Presentation and Timing of Delivery.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Israel Medical Association Journal Pub Date : 2024-10-01
Noa Leybovitz-Haleluya, Alla Saban, Adi Yariv, Reli Hershkovitz
{"title":"Term Breech Presentation and Timing of Delivery.","authors":"Noa Leybovitz-Haleluya, Alla Saban, Adi Yariv, Reli Hershkovitz","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Breech presentation is a major indication for cesarean delivery (CD); however, the ideal timing of breech CD is debatable.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To study the influence of gestational age at the time of CD in breech presentation on maternal and fetal complications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective study including term singleton CDs of breech presentation between February 2020 and January 2022 at a tertiary medical center. Maternal and neonatal outcomes were compared by gestational age at the time of CD. Logistic regression models were constructed to adjust for confounders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study population included 468 CDs, 227 (48.5%) were at 37 + 0 to 38 + 6 weeks, 168 (36%) were at 39 + 0 to 39 + 6 weeks (comparison group), and 73 (15.5%) were at ≥ 40 weeks at the time of delivery. The rate of emergent CDs was significantly higher in both study groups. The composite of maternal adverse outcomes was also significantly higher at ≥ 40 weeks of gestation. Using logistic regression model, associations remained significant. The adjusted odds ratios (OR) for emergent CDs at 37 + 0 to 38 + 6 weeks and at ≥ 40 weeks were 1.65 (P = 0.018) and 2.407 (P = 0.004), respectively. Adjusted OR for maternal adverse outcomes at ≥ 40 weeks was 2.094 (P = 0.018). Higher rates of emergent CDs in both study groups compared to the comparison group was noted. A composite of maternal adverse outcomes was significantly higher at ≥ 40 weeks of gestation. This association remained significant after controlling for potential confounders.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CDs at 39 + 0 to 39 + 6 weeks are associated with better maternal outcomes and lower rates of emergent CDs.</p>","PeriodicalId":50268,"journal":{"name":"Israel Medical Association Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Israel Medical Association Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Breech presentation is a major indication for cesarean delivery (CD); however, the ideal timing of breech CD is debatable.

Objectives: To study the influence of gestational age at the time of CD in breech presentation on maternal and fetal complications.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective study including term singleton CDs of breech presentation between February 2020 and January 2022 at a tertiary medical center. Maternal and neonatal outcomes were compared by gestational age at the time of CD. Logistic regression models were constructed to adjust for confounders.

Results: The study population included 468 CDs, 227 (48.5%) were at 37 + 0 to 38 + 6 weeks, 168 (36%) were at 39 + 0 to 39 + 6 weeks (comparison group), and 73 (15.5%) were at ≥ 40 weeks at the time of delivery. The rate of emergent CDs was significantly higher in both study groups. The composite of maternal adverse outcomes was also significantly higher at ≥ 40 weeks of gestation. Using logistic regression model, associations remained significant. The adjusted odds ratios (OR) for emergent CDs at 37 + 0 to 38 + 6 weeks and at ≥ 40 weeks were 1.65 (P = 0.018) and 2.407 (P = 0.004), respectively. Adjusted OR for maternal adverse outcomes at ≥ 40 weeks was 2.094 (P = 0.018). Higher rates of emergent CDs in both study groups compared to the comparison group was noted. A composite of maternal adverse outcomes was significantly higher at ≥ 40 weeks of gestation. This association remained significant after controlling for potential confounders.

Conclusions: CDs at 39 + 0 to 39 + 6 weeks are associated with better maternal outcomes and lower rates of emergent CDs.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
临产阵痛和分娩时间。
背景:臀先露是剖宫产(CD)的主要指征;然而,臀先露剖宫产的理想时机尚存争议:研究臀位分娩时的胎龄对母体和胎儿并发症的影响:我们在一家三级医疗中心开展了一项回顾性研究,研究对象包括 2020 年 2 月至 2022 年 1 月间臀先露的足月单胎分娩。产妇和新生儿的预后按臀先露时的胎龄进行比较。建立逻辑回归模型以调整混杂因素:研究对象包括 468 例 CD,其中 227 例(48.5%)在 37+0 至 38+6 周分娩,168 例(36%)在 39+0 至 39+6 周分娩(对比组),73 例(15.5%)在≥40 周分娩。两个研究组的急诊分娩率都明显较高。妊娠≥40周的孕产妇不良后果综合指数也明显较高。使用逻辑回归模型,相关性仍然很明显。妊娠 37+0 至 38+6 周和妊娠≥40 周时发生急诊 CD 的调整赔率(OR)分别为 1.65(P = 0.018)和 2.407(P = 0.004)。≥40周时产妇不良结局的调整OR值为2.094(P = 0.018)。与对比组相比,两个研究组的急诊 CD 发生率均较高。妊娠≥40周时,孕产妇不良结局的综合指数明显更高。在控制了潜在的混杂因素后,这种关联仍然很明显:结论:妊娠 39+0 到 39+6 周时进行产前诊断与更好的产妇预后和更低的急诊产前诊断率有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Israel Medical Association Journal
Israel Medical Association Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
12.50%
发文量
54
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Israel Medical Association Journal (IMAJ), representing medical sciences and medicine in Israel, is published in English by the Israel Medical Association. The Israel Medical Association Journal (IMAJ) was initiated in 1999.
期刊最新文献
A Novel CLCN1 Gene Mutation Associated with Hypokalemic Periodic Paralysis in a Pregnant Woman. Cholesterol Levels and Lipid Lowering Treatment in Coronary Heart Disease Patients Hospitalized Because of Anginal Syndrome. Epidural Abscess Caused by Aggregatibacter Aphrophilus. Evaluation of Vitamin K Antagonists Management and Control in Patients with Mechanical Prosthetic Heart Valves during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Hospitalization Outcomes of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Complicated with Diabetic Ketoacidosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1