Experiences and impacts of side effects among contraceptive users in the UK: exploring individual narratives of contraceptive side effects.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care Pub Date : 2024-10-10 DOI:10.1080/13625187.2024.2410841
Catherine Stewart, Rose Stevens, Fiona Kennedy, Paulina Cecula, Elena Rueda Carrasco, Jennifer Hall
{"title":"Experiences and impacts of side effects among contraceptive users in the UK: exploring individual narratives of contraceptive side effects.","authors":"Catherine Stewart, Rose Stevens, Fiona Kennedy, Paulina Cecula, Elena Rueda Carrasco, Jennifer Hall","doi":"10.1080/13625187.2024.2410841","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>While many women worldwide use contraception, there is a paucity of research on individual experiences of side effects. To address this gap, we investigated individual's contraception experiences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Women aged 18 to 35, living in the UK were invited to participate in an online survey on contraception. Free text responses were collected. Through a directed content analysis approach, we developed a coding framework (based on existing literature and initial response review) including six themes; method(s) of contraception, side effect(s) experienced, impact of side effect(s), timing of side effect(s), interactions with healthcare practitioners, and trial-and-error.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 337 participants provided free-text responses. Side effect experiences and impacts varied greatly between individuals and contraceptives. Most participants described negative effects, including mental health issues and bleeding problems. However, some shared positive experiences mainly related to bleeding management or the absence of side effects. Participants described how side effects often varied or appeared over time. Some participants felt unheard by healthcare practitioners.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlights how specific contraceptive experience is to the individual. We advocate for a patient-centred approach to contraceptive counselling. Practitioners should play an active role in improving contraception prescription, acknowledging the diverse experiences and preferences of patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":50491,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13625187.2024.2410841","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: While many women worldwide use contraception, there is a paucity of research on individual experiences of side effects. To address this gap, we investigated individual's contraception experiences.

Methods: Women aged 18 to 35, living in the UK were invited to participate in an online survey on contraception. Free text responses were collected. Through a directed content analysis approach, we developed a coding framework (based on existing literature and initial response review) including six themes; method(s) of contraception, side effect(s) experienced, impact of side effect(s), timing of side effect(s), interactions with healthcare practitioners, and trial-and-error.

Results: Overall, 337 participants provided free-text responses. Side effect experiences and impacts varied greatly between individuals and contraceptives. Most participants described negative effects, including mental health issues and bleeding problems. However, some shared positive experiences mainly related to bleeding management or the absence of side effects. Participants described how side effects often varied or appeared over time. Some participants felt unheard by healthcare practitioners.

Conclusions: This study highlights how specific contraceptive experience is to the individual. We advocate for a patient-centred approach to contraceptive counselling. Practitioners should play an active role in improving contraception prescription, acknowledging the diverse experiences and preferences of patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
英国避孕药使用者对副作用的体验和影响:探索个人对避孕药副作用的叙述。
目的:虽然全世界有许多妇女使用避孕药具,但有关个人副作用体验的研究却很少。为了填补这一空白,我们对个人的避孕经历进行了调查:方法:我们邀请居住在英国的 18 至 35 岁女性参与有关避孕的在线调查。我们收集了自由文本回复。通过定向内容分析方法,我们制定了一个编码框架(基于现有文献和初步回复审查),其中包括六个主题:避孕方法、经历的副作用、副作用的影响、副作用的时间、与医疗保健从业人员的互动以及试错:共有 337 名参与者提供了自由文本回答。副作用的经历和影响因人和避孕药具而异。大多数参与者描述了负面影响,包括心理健康问题和出血问题。不过,也有一些人分享了积极的经验,主要与出血控制或无副作用有关。与会者描述了副作用是如何随着时间的推移而变化或出现的。一些参与者认为医护人员没有听取他们的意见:本研究强调了避孕体验对个人的特殊性。我们提倡以患者为中心的避孕咨询方法。从业人员应在改进避孕处方方面发挥积极作用,承认患者的不同经历和偏好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
11.80%
发文量
63
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Official Journal of the European Society of Contraception and Reproductive Health, The European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care publishes original peer-reviewed research papers as well as review papers and other appropriate educational material.
期刊最新文献
The pre-Roe legal framework: a dissecting study of the evolution of abortion laws and their socio-legal implications. Patient acceptability of intra-amniotic digoxin versus intracardiac lidocaine for inducing foetal demise prior to second trimester medical abortion: a prospective cohort. The prolonged-release oral formulations: a new era in hormonal contraception technology? Family planning and contraception in people with multiple sclerosis: perspectives for obstetricians, gynaecologists, and other health care professionals involved in reproductive planning. Knowledge of contraceptive methods among deaf women: a qualitative study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1