Trajectory and predictors of post-stroke depression among patients with newly diagnosed stroke: A prospective longitudinal study

Yanjin Huang Ph.D. , Jiachun You MSN(c) , Qi Wang MSN , Wen Wen Ph.D.(c) , Changrong Yuan Ph.D., FAAN
{"title":"Trajectory and predictors of post-stroke depression among patients with newly diagnosed stroke: A prospective longitudinal study","authors":"Yanjin Huang Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Jiachun You MSN(c) ,&nbsp;Qi Wang MSN ,&nbsp;Wen Wen Ph.D.(c) ,&nbsp;Changrong Yuan Ph.D., FAAN","doi":"10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2024.108092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Post-stroke depression (PSD) is the most prevalent neuropsychological disorder among stroke patients, affecting approximately one-third of stroke survivors at any one time after a stroke. We identified between-person associations between post-stroke depression trajectories across 3 timepoints and predictors affecting trajectory classification among stroke patients.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This is a prospective longitudinal study using a convenience sample of 119 participants from 2 tertiary hospitals from March 2022 to September 2022. Clinical assessments and data collection were performed at diagnosis (T1), 3 months (T2), and 6 months (T3) after diagnosis. The instruments were Demographic and Disease Information Sheet and PROMIS-Depression 8a. Data were analyzed using SPSS 27.0 for descriptive statistics, logistic regression, and the Mplus program for growth mixture model analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Two stroke survivors depression trajectory classes (Class 1, moderate level decreasing- [37.8 %], and Class 2, high level increasing- [62.2%]) were delineated. Class 1 experienced moderate depression post-stroke, with a smooth diminishing pattern at T2 and T3, while Class 2 had a higher baseline depressive score and a significant increase at T2 and T3. The best growth mixture model was Class 2 model (LMR, <em>p</em>=0.010, BLRT, <em>p</em>≤0.01, AIC=2611.934, BIC=2650.842, aBIC=2606.583, Entropy= 0.944). The logistic regression results revealed that Class 2 of depression trajectory had a significant association with a lower score on cognitive function (B=-5.29, 95%CI: -8.80, -1.78, <em>p</em> &lt;0.05) compared with Class 1. The stroke type, marital status, and monthly income were predictors of the Class 2 depression trajectory group among stroke patients. Precisely, ischemic stroke is associated with lower risk of class 2 trajectory.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The trajectory of post-stroke depression changes over time. This research has the potential to serve as a foundation for the assessment of high-risk stroke patients, the development of precise management programs, the implementation of risk stratification, and the enhancement of prognosis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54368,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Stroke & Cerebrovascular Diseases","volume":"33 12","pages":"Article 108092"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Stroke & Cerebrovascular Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1052305724005366","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Post-stroke depression (PSD) is the most prevalent neuropsychological disorder among stroke patients, affecting approximately one-third of stroke survivors at any one time after a stroke. We identified between-person associations between post-stroke depression trajectories across 3 timepoints and predictors affecting trajectory classification among stroke patients.

Methods

This is a prospective longitudinal study using a convenience sample of 119 participants from 2 tertiary hospitals from March 2022 to September 2022. Clinical assessments and data collection were performed at diagnosis (T1), 3 months (T2), and 6 months (T3) after diagnosis. The instruments were Demographic and Disease Information Sheet and PROMIS-Depression 8a. Data were analyzed using SPSS 27.0 for descriptive statistics, logistic regression, and the Mplus program for growth mixture model analysis.

Results

Two stroke survivors depression trajectory classes (Class 1, moderate level decreasing- [37.8 %], and Class 2, high level increasing- [62.2%]) were delineated. Class 1 experienced moderate depression post-stroke, with a smooth diminishing pattern at T2 and T3, while Class 2 had a higher baseline depressive score and a significant increase at T2 and T3. The best growth mixture model was Class 2 model (LMR, p=0.010, BLRT, p≤0.01, AIC=2611.934, BIC=2650.842, aBIC=2606.583, Entropy= 0.944). The logistic regression results revealed that Class 2 of depression trajectory had a significant association with a lower score on cognitive function (B=-5.29, 95%CI: -8.80, -1.78, p <0.05) compared with Class 1. The stroke type, marital status, and monthly income were predictors of the Class 2 depression trajectory group among stroke patients. Precisely, ischemic stroke is associated with lower risk of class 2 trajectory.

Conclusion

The trajectory of post-stroke depression changes over time. This research has the potential to serve as a foundation for the assessment of high-risk stroke patients, the development of precise management programs, the implementation of risk stratification, and the enhancement of prognosis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新诊断卒中患者卒中后抑郁的轨迹和预测因素:前瞻性纵向研究
背景:卒中后抑郁(PSD)是卒中患者中最常见的神经心理障碍,约有三分之一的卒中幸存者在卒中后的任何时间都会受到影响。我们确定了中风后抑郁轨迹在 3 个时间点上的人际关联以及影响中风患者轨迹分类的预测因素:这是一项前瞻性纵向研究,从 2022 年 3 月至 2022 年 9 月对两家三甲医院的 119 名参与者进行了方便抽样调查。临床评估和数据收集分别在诊断时(T1)、诊断后 3 个月(T2)和 6 个月(T3)进行。评估工具为人口与疾病信息表和 PROMIS 抑郁 8a。数据分析采用 SPSS 27.0 进行描述性统计、逻辑回归和 Mplus 程序进行生长混合模型分析:结果:划分出两个中风幸存者抑郁轨迹等级(1 级,中度抑郁--[37.8%];2 级,高度抑郁--[62.2%])。第 1 类患者在卒中后出现中度抑郁,在 T2 和 T3 阶段呈平稳递减模式,而第 2 类患者的基线抑郁评分较高,在 T2 和 T3 阶段显著增加。最佳增长混合模型为 2 类模型(LMR,p=0.010,BLRT,p≤0.01,AIC=2611.934,BIC=2650.842,aBIC=2606.583,熵=0.944)。逻辑回归结果显示,抑郁轨迹 2 与认知功能得分较低有显著相关性(B=-5.29,95%CI:-8.80,-1.78,P 结论:抑郁轨迹 2 与认知功能得分较低有显著相关性:卒中后抑郁的轨迹会随着时间的推移而改变。这项研究有望为评估高危卒中患者、制定精确的管理方案、实施风险分层和改善预后奠定基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
4.00%
发文量
583
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Stroke & Cerebrovascular Diseases publishes original papers on basic and clinical science related to the fields of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases. The Journal also features review articles, controversies, methods and technical notes, selected case reports and other original articles of special nature. Its editorial mission is to focus on prevention and repair of cerebrovascular disease. Clinical papers emphasize medical and surgical aspects of stroke, clinical trials and design, epidemiology, stroke care delivery systems and outcomes, imaging sciences and rehabilitation of stroke. The Journal will be of special interest to specialists involved in caring for patients with cerebrovascular disease, including neurologists, neurosurgeons and cardiologists.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to "Spontaneous Neuronal Plasticity in the Contralateral Motor Cortex and Corticospinal Tract after Focal Cortical Infarction in Hypertensive Rats" [J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis,2020 Dec;29(12):105235/Manuscript NO:JSCVD-D-20-00162]. CONTEXTUAL AND CLINICAL FACTORS AS EXPLAINERS OF STROKE SEVERITY, RESIDUAL MOTOR IMPAIRMENTS, AND FUNCTIONAL INDEPENDENCE DURING HOSPITALIZATION. CTP-Derived Venous Outflow Profiles Correlate With Tissue-Level Collaterals Regardless of Arterial Collateral Status. Relationship between hyoid-carotid distance, hyoid position and morphology and degree of stenosis and associated stroke. Stroke education: Engaging learners and the community to advance care for cerebrovascular disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1