A scoping review of the drivers and barriers influencing healthcare professionals' behavioral intentions to comply with electronic health record data privacy policy.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Health Informatics Journal Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1177/14604582241296398
Nabil D Alhassani, Richard Windle, Stathis Th Konstantinidis
{"title":"A scoping review of the drivers and barriers influencing healthcare professionals' behavioral intentions to comply with electronic health record data privacy policy.","authors":"Nabil D Alhassani, Richard Windle, Stathis Th Konstantinidis","doi":"10.1177/14604582241296398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Electronic Health Records (EHRs) are now an integral part of health systems in middle and high-income countries despite recognized deficits in the digital competencies of Healthcare Professionals (HCPs). Therefore, we undertook a scoping review of factors influencing compliance with EHR data privacy policies. <b>Methods:</b> Seven databases revealed 27 relevant studies, covering a range of countries, professional groups, and research methods. The diverse nature of these factors meant that 18 separate theoretical frameworks representing technology-acceptance to behavioral psychology were used to interpret these. <b>Results:</b> The predominant factors influencing compliance with EHR data privacy policies included confidence and competence to comply, perceived ease of use, facilitatory environmental factors, perceived usefulness, fear that non-compliance would be detected and/or punished and the expectations of others. <b>Conclusion:</b> Human factors such as attitudes, social pressure, confidence, and perceived usefulness are as important as technical factors and must be addressed to improve compliance.</p>","PeriodicalId":55069,"journal":{"name":"Health Informatics Journal","volume":"30 4","pages":"14604582241296398"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Informatics Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14604582241296398","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Electronic Health Records (EHRs) are now an integral part of health systems in middle and high-income countries despite recognized deficits in the digital competencies of Healthcare Professionals (HCPs). Therefore, we undertook a scoping review of factors influencing compliance with EHR data privacy policies. Methods: Seven databases revealed 27 relevant studies, covering a range of countries, professional groups, and research methods. The diverse nature of these factors meant that 18 separate theoretical frameworks representing technology-acceptance to behavioral psychology were used to interpret these. Results: The predominant factors influencing compliance with EHR data privacy policies included confidence and competence to comply, perceived ease of use, facilitatory environmental factors, perceived usefulness, fear that non-compliance would be detected and/or punished and the expectations of others. Conclusion: Human factors such as attitudes, social pressure, confidence, and perceived usefulness are as important as technical factors and must be addressed to improve compliance.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对影响医疗保健专业人员遵守电子健康记录数据隐私政策的行为意向的驱动因素和障碍进行范围审查。
目的:尽管公认医疗保健专业人员(HCPs)在数字化能力方面存在不足,但电子健康记录(EHRs)现已成为中等收入和高收入国家医疗系统不可或缺的一部分。因此,我们对影响遵守电子健康记录数据隐私政策的因素进行了一次范围界定研究。研究方法七个数据库显示了 27 项相关研究,涵盖了一系列国家、专业团体和研究方法。这些因素的多样性意味着我们使用了 18 个不同的理论框架,从技术接受到行为心理学来解释这些因素。研究结果影响遵守电子病历数据隐私政策的主要因素包括:遵守政策的信心和能力、感知到的易用性、有利的环境因素、感知到的有用性、担心不遵守政策会被发现和/或受到惩罚以及他人的期望。结论态度、社会压力、信心和感知有用性等人为因素与技术因素同样重要,必须加以解决,以提高遵从性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Informatics Journal
Health Informatics Journal HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-MEDICAL INFORMATICS
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
80
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Health Informatics Journal is an international peer-reviewed journal. All papers submitted to Health Informatics Journal are subject to peer review by members of a carefully appointed editorial board. The journal operates a conventional single-blind reviewing policy in which the reviewer’s name is always concealed from the submitting author.
期刊最新文献
Researching public health datasets in the era of deep learning: a systematic literature review. A blueprint for large language model-augmented telehealth for HIV mitigation in Indonesia: A scoping review of a novel therapeutic modality. Advancing African American and hispanic health literacy with a bilingual, personalized, prevention smartphone application. Evaluating the quality of Spanish-language information for patients with type 2 diabetes on YouTube and Facebook. Pathways to usage intention of mobile health apps among hypertensive patients: A fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1