Governance intricacies in implementing regional shared care records: A qualitative study in the national health service, England.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Health Informatics Journal Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1177/14604582241290709
Andrey Elizondo
{"title":"Governance intricacies in implementing regional shared care records: A qualitative study in the national health service, England.","authors":"Andrey Elizondo","doi":"10.1177/14604582241290709","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study explores the governance intricacies in establishing a large-scale information infrastructure for integrated care within the National Health Service of England. By focusing on the initial 5 years of a regional interoperability program, we examine the challenges and dynamics of creating a unified system across organizational boundaries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A longitudinal multi-methods approach was utilized, collecting data through interviews with health and social care personnel involved in project governance, meeting observations, and document analysis. This provided an in-depth understanding of the processes and challenges of developing the regional interoperability program.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study reveals a dynamic negotiation process and evolving governance structures that must continuously adapt to integrate diverse systems. Key findings include challenges in reconciling multiplicity and heterogeneity, the importance of social learning and stakeholder adaptation, and the role of ongoing negotiation and collaborative group construction in implementing interorganizational infrastructures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study underscores the necessity of continuous adaptation and negotiation among stakeholders in establishing effective governance of integrated care infrastructures. Social learning and active participation play pivotal roles in overcoming the challenges associated with system integration. Strategic insights from this research can guide stakeholders in developing sociotechnical solutions for digital interorganizational infrastructures in integrated care.</p>","PeriodicalId":55069,"journal":{"name":"Health Informatics Journal","volume":"30 4","pages":"14604582241290709"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Informatics Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14604582241290709","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study explores the governance intricacies in establishing a large-scale information infrastructure for integrated care within the National Health Service of England. By focusing on the initial 5 years of a regional interoperability program, we examine the challenges and dynamics of creating a unified system across organizational boundaries.

Methods: A longitudinal multi-methods approach was utilized, collecting data through interviews with health and social care personnel involved in project governance, meeting observations, and document analysis. This provided an in-depth understanding of the processes and challenges of developing the regional interoperability program.

Results: This study reveals a dynamic negotiation process and evolving governance structures that must continuously adapt to integrate diverse systems. Key findings include challenges in reconciling multiplicity and heterogeneity, the importance of social learning and stakeholder adaptation, and the role of ongoing negotiation and collaborative group construction in implementing interorganizational infrastructures.

Conclusion: This study underscores the necessity of continuous adaptation and negotiation among stakeholders in establishing effective governance of integrated care infrastructures. Social learning and active participation play pivotal roles in overcoming the challenges associated with system integration. Strategic insights from this research can guide stakeholders in developing sociotechnical solutions for digital interorganizational infrastructures in integrated care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
实施区域共享护理记录过程中的治理难题:英国国家医疗服务定性研究。
研究目的本研究探讨了在英格兰国家医疗服务机构内建立大规模综合医疗信息基础设施的复杂管理过程。通过关注地区互操作性项目最初 5 年的情况,我们研究了创建跨组织边界的统一系统所面临的挑战和动态变化:我们采用了一种纵向的多种方法,通过采访参与项目管理的医疗和社会护理人员、观察会议和分析文件来收集数据。这有助于深入了解开发地区互操作性计划的过程和挑战:本研究揭示了一个动态的谈判过程和不断发展的治理结构,这些结构必须不断调整以整合不同的系统。主要发现包括在协调多元性和异质性方面的挑战、社会学习和利益相关者适应的重要性,以及在实施组织间基础设施过程中持续谈判和协作小组建设的作用:本研究强调了利益相关者在建立有效的综合医疗基础设施管理过程中不断适应和协商的必要性。社会学习和积极参与在克服与系统整合相关的挑战方面发挥着关键作用。本研究得出的战略见解可指导利益相关者为综合护理中的数字组织间基础设施制定社会技术解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Informatics Journal
Health Informatics Journal HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-MEDICAL INFORMATICS
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
80
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Health Informatics Journal is an international peer-reviewed journal. All papers submitted to Health Informatics Journal are subject to peer review by members of a carefully appointed editorial board. The journal operates a conventional single-blind reviewing policy in which the reviewer’s name is always concealed from the submitting author.
期刊最新文献
Empowering healthcare education: A multilingual ontology for medical informatics and digital health (MIMO) integrated to artificial intelligence powered training in smart hospitals. Analysis of health recommendations using longitudinal quality of life data: QoL@TbA - A transformer-based approach. Analysis of total RNA as a potential biomarker of developmental neurotoxicity in silico. Characterizing pituitary adenomas in clinical notes: Corpus construction and its application in LLMs. HealthCheck: A method for evaluating persuasive mobile health applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1