National survey found that paediatricians frequently used messaging apps to hold informal consultations with parents and patients.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS Acta Paediatrica Pub Date : 2024-10-22 DOI:10.1111/apa.17470
Yonatan Goffer, Yoel Levinsky, Daniel Landau, Itay Berger, Yoav Vardy, Gabriel Chodick, Alexander Lowenthal, Liat Ashkenazi-Hoffnung, Oded Scheuerman
{"title":"National survey found that paediatricians frequently used messaging apps to hold informal consultations with parents and patients.","authors":"Yonatan Goffer, Yoel Levinsky, Daniel Landau, Itay Berger, Yoav Vardy, Gabriel Chodick, Alexander Lowenthal, Liat Ashkenazi-Hoffnung, Oded Scheuerman","doi":"10.1111/apa.17470","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Paediatricians using instant messaging phone apps for informal medical discussions poses ethical and legal risks. We filled a gap in the research, by assessing the use of apps and the possible risks.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A national, cross-sectional, questionnaire study was conducted in Israel from 11 August to 20 November 2019. The frequency of informal discussions, clinical details and recommendations were compared to the paediatricians' expertise and work settings. The discussions included work and private phones, consultation with the parents of patients and advice to the paediatricians' friends and families.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 305 paediatricians who responded had a median age of 37 (range 27-74) years: 42% were residents and 58% were specialists. The majority (99%) had carried out informal discussions using a messaging app in the last week and 65% had used them for 1-5 discussions. Specialists were more likely to use apps for more than 10 discussions per week than residents (24% vs. 5%, p < 0.001) and recommend treatment via apps (35% vs. 22%, p < 0.001). A third failed to provide disclaimers about the risks of app-based discussions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Using instant messaging apps for informal medical discussions was common, but ethical and legal aspects were not always fully considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":55562,"journal":{"name":"Acta Paediatrica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Paediatrica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/apa.17470","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Paediatricians using instant messaging phone apps for informal medical discussions poses ethical and legal risks. We filled a gap in the research, by assessing the use of apps and the possible risks.

Methods: A national, cross-sectional, questionnaire study was conducted in Israel from 11 August to 20 November 2019. The frequency of informal discussions, clinical details and recommendations were compared to the paediatricians' expertise and work settings. The discussions included work and private phones, consultation with the parents of patients and advice to the paediatricians' friends and families.

Results: The 305 paediatricians who responded had a median age of 37 (range 27-74) years: 42% were residents and 58% were specialists. The majority (99%) had carried out informal discussions using a messaging app in the last week and 65% had used them for 1-5 discussions. Specialists were more likely to use apps for more than 10 discussions per week than residents (24% vs. 5%, p < 0.001) and recommend treatment via apps (35% vs. 22%, p < 0.001). A third failed to provide disclaimers about the risks of app-based discussions.

Conclusion: Using instant messaging apps for informal medical discussions was common, but ethical and legal aspects were not always fully considered.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全国调查发现,儿科医生经常使用信息应用程序与家长和病人进行非正式会诊。
目的:儿科医生在非正式医疗讨论中使用手机即时通讯应用程序会带来伦理和法律风险。我们通过评估应用程序的使用情况和可能存在的风险,填补了研究空白:2019年8月11日至11月20日,我们在以色列开展了一项全国性横断面问卷调查。将非正式讨论的频率、临床细节和建议与儿科医生的专业知识和工作环境进行了比较。讨论内容包括工作电话和私人电话、与患者父母的咨询以及向儿科医生的朋友和家人提供的建议:305名作出回复的儿科医生的年龄中位数为37岁(27-74岁):42%为住院医生,58%为专科医生。大多数人(99%)在上周使用过信息应用程序进行非正式讨论,65%的人在1-5次讨论中使用过。与住院医师相比,专科医生更有可能每周使用应用程序进行 10 次以上的讨论(24% 对 5%,p 结论:使用即时通讯应用程序进行非正式讨论的比例较高:在非正式医学讨论中使用即时通讯应用程序很常见,但伦理和法律方面的问题并不总是得到充分考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Paediatrica
Acta Paediatrica 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
5.30%
发文量
384
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Paediatrica is a peer-reviewed monthly journal at the forefront of international pediatric research. It covers both clinical and experimental research in all areas of pediatrics including: neonatal medicine developmental medicine adolescent medicine child health and environment psychosomatic pediatrics child health in developing countries
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum correcting the brief report 'The influence of preschool IQ on the individual-order stability of intelligence into adulthood'. Increased risk of autism in extremely preterm children with a history of retinopathy of prematurity. Adherence to the Swedish paediatric guidelines for urinary tract infections. Early milk cereal drink consumption correlated with rapid weight gain but not with subsequent adiposity. Plasmapheresis for the treatment of IgA vasculitis nephritis in children: A case series.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1