Conscious experiences during non-rapid eye movement sleep parasomnias

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews Pub Date : 2024-10-16 DOI:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2024.105919
Anna Castelnovo , Francesca Siclari , Sara Spaggiari , Dolores Borth , Mauro Manconi , Isabelle Arnulf , Carlos H. Schenck
{"title":"Conscious experiences during non-rapid eye movement sleep parasomnias","authors":"Anna Castelnovo ,&nbsp;Francesca Siclari ,&nbsp;Sara Spaggiari ,&nbsp;Dolores Borth ,&nbsp;Mauro Manconi ,&nbsp;Isabelle Arnulf ,&nbsp;Carlos H. Schenck","doi":"10.1016/j.neubiorev.2024.105919","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Disorders of Arousal (DOA) are non-rapid eye movement (NREM) parasomnias traditionally regarded as unconscious states. However, recent research challenges this assumption. This narrative review aims to explore the presence and qualitative features of conscious experiences in patients with DOA during their episodes. The literature indicates a higher recall of conscious experiences during DOA episodes than previously believed, estimated at about 50–60 % in adults (immediately post-episode). Data on children are limited but suggest a lower recall rate (&lt;30 % when interviewed retrospectively). Patient reports range from brief scenic fragments to elaborate scenarios with plot development, often fraught with negative emotions and misfortunes and with considerable correspondence between subjective experiences and observed behaviors. In many of the described cases, patients appear to enact their dreams, entering a hallucinatory state where internally generated images overlay external percepts. The potential implications for clinical management, research endeavors, and legal considerations regarding nocturnal violence, along with existing limitations and controversial points, are discussed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56105,"journal":{"name":"Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews","volume":"167 ","pages":"Article 105919"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149763424003889","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Disorders of Arousal (DOA) are non-rapid eye movement (NREM) parasomnias traditionally regarded as unconscious states. However, recent research challenges this assumption. This narrative review aims to explore the presence and qualitative features of conscious experiences in patients with DOA during their episodes. The literature indicates a higher recall of conscious experiences during DOA episodes than previously believed, estimated at about 50–60 % in adults (immediately post-episode). Data on children are limited but suggest a lower recall rate (<30 % when interviewed retrospectively). Patient reports range from brief scenic fragments to elaborate scenarios with plot development, often fraught with negative emotions and misfortunes and with considerable correspondence between subjective experiences and observed behaviors. In many of the described cases, patients appear to enact their dreams, entering a hallucinatory state where internally generated images overlay external percepts. The potential implications for clinical management, research endeavors, and legal considerations regarding nocturnal violence, along with existing limitations and controversial points, are discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非快速眼动睡眠寄生虫期间的意识体验。
唤醒障碍(DOA)是一种非快速眼动(NREM)寄生虫,传统上被视为无意识状态。然而,最近的研究对这一假设提出了挑战。这篇叙述性综述旨在探讨唤醒障碍患者在发作期间是否存在意识体验以及意识体验的定性特征。文献表明,对 DOA 发作期间精神活动的回忆比以前认为的要高,估计成人中约有 50-60%(发作后立即回忆)。有关儿童的数据有限,但表明儿童的回忆率较低 (
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
466
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The official journal of the International Behavioral Neuroscience Society publishes original and significant review articles that explore the intersection between neuroscience and the study of psychological processes and behavior. The journal also welcomes articles that primarily focus on psychological processes and behavior, as long as they have relevance to one or more areas of neuroscience.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Emotions in multi-brain dynamics: A promising research frontier Neuroanatomical and neurochemical substrates mediating fear-induced antinociception: A systematic review of rodent preclinical studies. The association between female sex and depression following traumatic brain injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Contextualizing predictive minds
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1