Multivariate Bayesian Analyses in Nursing Research: An Introductory Guide.

Lacey W Heinsberg, Tara S Davis, Dylan Maher, Catherine M Bender, Yvette P Conley, Daniel E Weeks
{"title":"Multivariate Bayesian Analyses in Nursing Research: An Introductory Guide.","authors":"Lacey W Heinsberg, Tara S Davis, Dylan Maher, Catherine M Bender, Yvette P Conley, Daniel E Weeks","doi":"10.1177/10998004241292644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the era of precision health, nursing research has increasingly focused on the analysis of large, multidimensional data sets containing multiple correlated phenotypes (e.g., symptoms). This presents challenges for statistical analyses, especially in genetic association studies. For example, the inclusion of multiple symptoms within a single model can raise concerns about multicollinearity, while individual SNP-symptom analyses may obscure complex relationships. As such, many traditional statistical approaches often fall short in providing a comprehensive understanding of the complexity inherent in many nursing-focused research questions. Multivariate Bayesian approaches offer the unique advantage of allowing researchers to ask questions that are not feasible with traditional approaches. Specifically, these methods support the simultaneous exploration of multiple phenotypes, accounting for the underlying correlational structure between variables, and allow for formal incorporation of existing knowledge into the statistical model. By doing so, they may provide a more realistic view of statistical relationships within a <i>biological system</i>, potentially uncovering new insights into well-established and undiscovered connections, such as the probabilities of association and direct versus indirect effects. This valuable information can help us better understand our phenotypes of interest, leading to more effective nurse-led intervention and prevention programs. To illustrate these concepts, this paper includes an application section covering two specific multivariate Bayesian analysis software programs, <i>bnlearn</i> and <i>mvBIMBAM</i>, with an emphasis on interpretation and extension to nursing research. To complement the paper, we provide access to a detailed online tutorial, including executable R code and a synthetic data set, so the concepts can be more easily extended to other research questions.</p>","PeriodicalId":93901,"journal":{"name":"Biological research for nursing","volume":" ","pages":"10998004241292644"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological research for nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10998004241292644","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the era of precision health, nursing research has increasingly focused on the analysis of large, multidimensional data sets containing multiple correlated phenotypes (e.g., symptoms). This presents challenges for statistical analyses, especially in genetic association studies. For example, the inclusion of multiple symptoms within a single model can raise concerns about multicollinearity, while individual SNP-symptom analyses may obscure complex relationships. As such, many traditional statistical approaches often fall short in providing a comprehensive understanding of the complexity inherent in many nursing-focused research questions. Multivariate Bayesian approaches offer the unique advantage of allowing researchers to ask questions that are not feasible with traditional approaches. Specifically, these methods support the simultaneous exploration of multiple phenotypes, accounting for the underlying correlational structure between variables, and allow for formal incorporation of existing knowledge into the statistical model. By doing so, they may provide a more realistic view of statistical relationships within a biological system, potentially uncovering new insights into well-established and undiscovered connections, such as the probabilities of association and direct versus indirect effects. This valuable information can help us better understand our phenotypes of interest, leading to more effective nurse-led intervention and prevention programs. To illustrate these concepts, this paper includes an application section covering two specific multivariate Bayesian analysis software programs, bnlearn and mvBIMBAM, with an emphasis on interpretation and extension to nursing research. To complement the paper, we provide access to a detailed online tutorial, including executable R code and a synthetic data set, so the concepts can be more easily extended to other research questions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
护理研究中的多变量贝叶斯分析:护理研究中的多变量贝叶分析:入门指南》。
在精准健康时代,护理研究越来越注重分析包含多种相关表型(如症状)的大型多维数据集。这给统计分析带来了挑战,尤其是在遗传关联研究中。例如,在单一模型中包含多种症状可能会引发多重共线性问题,而单个 SNP-症状分析可能会掩盖复杂的关系。因此,许多传统的统计方法往往无法全面了解许多以护理为重点的研究问题的内在复杂性。多变量贝叶斯方法具有独特的优势,允许研究人员提出传统方法无法解决的问题。具体来说,这些方法支持同时探索多种表型,考虑变量之间的潜在相关结构,并允许将现有知识正式纳入统计模型。通过这样做,这些方法可以更真实地反映生物系统内的统计关系,并有可能揭示已建立和未发现的联系的新见解,如关联概率和直接效应与间接效应。这些宝贵的信息可以帮助我们更好地了解我们感兴趣的表型,从而制定出更有效的由护士主导的干预和预防计划。为了说明这些概念,本文包括一个应用部分,涉及两个特定的多元贝叶斯分析软件程序:bnlearn 和 mvBIMBAM,重点是解释和推广到护理研究中。作为本文的补充,我们提供了详细的在线教程,包括可执行的 R 代码和合成数据集,以便更轻松地将这些概念推广到其他研究问题中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Association Between Serum Albumin and the Length of Hospital Stay Among Patients With Acute Heart Failure. L-Shaped Associations Between Composite Dietary Antioxidant Index and Hearing Loss: A Cross-Sectional Study From the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. The Effects of Aquatic Exercise Training on Functional and Hemodynamic Responses in Patients With Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Melatonin in Human Milk: A Scoping Review. Plant-Based Diets and Cardiovascular Disease in Older Adults: An Integrative Literature Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1