Identifying optimal locations for the development of health facilities towards the attainment of universal health coverage using geospatial techniques in Kishapu district, Tanzania

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Health & Place Pub Date : 2024-10-18 DOI:10.1016/j.healthplace.2024.103369
Evord Kimario , Lucy Joseph , Nestory Yamungu , Joseph Mango
{"title":"Identifying optimal locations for the development of health facilities towards the attainment of universal health coverage using geospatial techniques in Kishapu district, Tanzania","authors":"Evord Kimario ,&nbsp;Lucy Joseph ,&nbsp;Nestory Yamungu ,&nbsp;Joseph Mango","doi":"10.1016/j.healthplace.2024.103369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Two hours of travel time specified by the World Health Organization (WHO) to access quality health services is among the most important criteria for the Universal Health Coverage. However, locations of health facilities (HF) in many developing countries fail to realise this target due to a lack of appropriate models considering the local environment. This work used the central-place theory to explore locations of HF in Kishapu and their accessibility status based on two means of transport in the AccessMod tool: <em>walking only</em> and the combination of <em>walking-and-motor</em> devices. The results of the walking scenario indicated that the travel times to the health centres and hospitals exceeded 2 h, and a direct relationship existed between the facility level and the travel time spent to access it. The combined transport (walking and motorized) showed that dispensaries are easily accessible (14.5 min) compared to health centres (42.8 min) and hospitals (67.3 min). To address the challenge, we have developed a model revealing optimal sites with quick access for HF construction and improvement using Multi-Criteria-Evaluation and Analytical-Hierarchy Process methods weighting five criteria including distance from settlements (44% weight), roads (26% weight), existing health facilities (16% weight), rivers (9% weight) and railway (5% weight). A test of the model with both means of transport shows that at all places proposed to be optimal allow patitents to travel in less than 2 h, indicating that the proposed model can effectively and efficiently solve the challenge of allocating HF in society.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49302,"journal":{"name":"Health & Place","volume":"90 ","pages":"Article 103369"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health & Place","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1353829224001977","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Two hours of travel time specified by the World Health Organization (WHO) to access quality health services is among the most important criteria for the Universal Health Coverage. However, locations of health facilities (HF) in many developing countries fail to realise this target due to a lack of appropriate models considering the local environment. This work used the central-place theory to explore locations of HF in Kishapu and their accessibility status based on two means of transport in the AccessMod tool: walking only and the combination of walking-and-motor devices. The results of the walking scenario indicated that the travel times to the health centres and hospitals exceeded 2 h, and a direct relationship existed between the facility level and the travel time spent to access it. The combined transport (walking and motorized) showed that dispensaries are easily accessible (14.5 min) compared to health centres (42.8 min) and hospitals (67.3 min). To address the challenge, we have developed a model revealing optimal sites with quick access for HF construction and improvement using Multi-Criteria-Evaluation and Analytical-Hierarchy Process methods weighting five criteria including distance from settlements (44% weight), roads (26% weight), existing health facilities (16% weight), rivers (9% weight) and railway (5% weight). A test of the model with both means of transport shows that at all places proposed to be optimal allow patitents to travel in less than 2 h, indicating that the proposed model can effectively and efficiently solve the challenge of allocating HF in society.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用地理空间技术确定坦桑尼亚基沙普区发展医疗设施的最佳地点,以实现全民医保。
世界卫生组织(WHO)规定,获得优质医疗服务所需的两小时旅行时间是全民医保最重要的标准之一。然而,由于缺乏考虑当地环境的适当模型,许多发展中国家的医疗设施(HF)选址未能实现这一目标。这项研究利用中心地理论,根据 AccessMod 工具中的两种交通方式(仅步行和步行与机动设备相结合),探讨了基沙普岛卫生设施的选址及其可达性状况。步行方案的结果表明,前往保健中心和医院的旅行时间超过 2 小时,设施级别与前往所花费的旅行时间之间存在直接关系。综合交通(步行和机动车)显示,药房(14.5 分钟)比保健中心(42.8 分钟)和医院(67.3 分钟)更容易到达。为了应对这一挑战,我们使用多重标准评价法和层次分析法建立了一个模型,该模型揭示了建造和改善高频设施的最佳快速通道选址,并对五项标准进行了加权,包括与居民点的距离(占 44% 的权重)、道路(占 26% 的权重)、现有医疗设施(占 16% 的权重)、河流(占 9% 的权重)和铁路(占 5% 的权重)。用两种交通工具对模型进行的测试表明,在所有建议的最佳地点,专利权人的旅行时间都少于 2 小时,这表明建议的模型能够有效和高效地解决高频在社会中的分配难题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health & Place
Health & Place PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
6.20%
发文量
176
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: he journal is an interdisciplinary journal dedicated to the study of all aspects of health and health care in which place or location matters.
期刊最新文献
Outdoor health intervention for refugees, migrants, and asylum-seekers: A mixed-methods pilot study Hard-to-reach communities in the rural Ecuador: A qualitative perspective on dietary habits and physical activity Editorial Board Forces at play: A qualitative study of risk aversion, policy and decision making for children's physically active play in schools Using citizen science to explore barriers and facilitators for healthy and sustainable lifestyles in office environments
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1