Moving from features to functions: Bridging disciplinary understandings of urban environments to support healthy people and ecosystems

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Health & Place Pub Date : 2024-10-18 DOI:10.1016/j.healthplace.2024.103368
Andy Yuille , Jessica Davies , Mark Green , Charlotte Hardman , Jo Knight , Rachel Marshall , Hannah Armitt , Miranda Bane , Alex Bush , Victoria Carr , Rebecca Clark , Sally Cox , Felicity Crotty , Sian de Bell , Annabelle Edwards , Jody Ferguson , Rich Fry , Mark Goddard , Andy Harrod , Helen E. Hoyle , Piran White
{"title":"Moving from features to functions: Bridging disciplinary understandings of urban environments to support healthy people and ecosystems","authors":"Andy Yuille ,&nbsp;Jessica Davies ,&nbsp;Mark Green ,&nbsp;Charlotte Hardman ,&nbsp;Jo Knight ,&nbsp;Rachel Marshall ,&nbsp;Hannah Armitt ,&nbsp;Miranda Bane ,&nbsp;Alex Bush ,&nbsp;Victoria Carr ,&nbsp;Rebecca Clark ,&nbsp;Sally Cox ,&nbsp;Felicity Crotty ,&nbsp;Sian de Bell ,&nbsp;Annabelle Edwards ,&nbsp;Jody Ferguson ,&nbsp;Rich Fry ,&nbsp;Mark Goddard ,&nbsp;Andy Harrod ,&nbsp;Helen E. Hoyle ,&nbsp;Piran White","doi":"10.1016/j.healthplace.2024.103368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Contact with nature can contribute to health and wellbeing, but knowledge gaps persist regarding the environmental characteristics that promote these benefits. Understanding and maximising these benefits is particularly important in urban areas, where opportunities for such contact is limited. At the same time, we are facing climate and ecological crises which require policy and practice to support ecosystem functioning. Policies are increasingly being oriented towards delivering benefits for people and nature simultaneously. However, different disciplinary understandings of environments and environmental quality present challenges to this agenda. This paper highlights key knowledge gaps concerning linkages between nature and health. It then describes two perspectives on environmental quality, based respectively in environmental sciences and social sciences. It argues that understanding the linkages between these perspectives is vital to enable urban environments to be planned, designed and managed for the benefit of both environmental functioning and human health. Finally, it identifies key challenges and priorities for integrating these different disciplinary perspectives.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49302,"journal":{"name":"Health & Place","volume":"90 ","pages":"Article 103368"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health & Place","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1353829224001965","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Contact with nature can contribute to health and wellbeing, but knowledge gaps persist regarding the environmental characteristics that promote these benefits. Understanding and maximising these benefits is particularly important in urban areas, where opportunities for such contact is limited. At the same time, we are facing climate and ecological crises which require policy and practice to support ecosystem functioning. Policies are increasingly being oriented towards delivering benefits for people and nature simultaneously. However, different disciplinary understandings of environments and environmental quality present challenges to this agenda. This paper highlights key knowledge gaps concerning linkages between nature and health. It then describes two perspectives on environmental quality, based respectively in environmental sciences and social sciences. It argues that understanding the linkages between these perspectives is vital to enable urban environments to be planned, designed and managed for the benefit of both environmental functioning and human health. Finally, it identifies key challenges and priorities for integrating these different disciplinary perspectives.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从特征到功能:沟通对城市环境的学科理解,为健康的人类和生态系统提供支持。
与大自然接触可以促进健康和幸福,但在促进这些益处的环境特征方面仍然存在知识差距。在接触机会有限的城市地区,了解并最大限度地利用这些益处尤为重要。与此同时,我们正面临着气候和生态危机,这就要求政策和实践支持生态系统的功能。政策越来越倾向于同时为人类和自然造福。然而,对环境和环境质量的不同学科理解给这一议程带来了挑战。本文强调了有关自然与健康之间联系的主要知识差距。然后,本文介绍了分别基于环境科学和社会科学的两种环境质量观点。本文认为,了解这些观点之间的联系对于规划、设计和管理城市环境,使其既有利于环境功能,又有利于人类健康至关重要。最后,它指出了整合这些不同学科视角的主要挑战和优先事项。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health & Place
Health & Place PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
6.20%
发文量
176
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: he journal is an interdisciplinary journal dedicated to the study of all aspects of health and health care in which place or location matters.
期刊最新文献
Outdoor health intervention for refugees, migrants, and asylum-seekers: A mixed-methods pilot study Hard-to-reach communities in the rural Ecuador: A qualitative perspective on dietary habits and physical activity Editorial Board Forces at play: A qualitative study of risk aversion, policy and decision making for children's physically active play in schools Using citizen science to explore barriers and facilitators for healthy and sustainable lifestyles in office environments
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1