Assessing the feasibility and likelihood of policy options to lower specialty drug costs.

Health affairs scholar Pub Date : 2024-09-27 eCollection Date: 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1093/haschl/qxae118
Erin A Taylor, Dmitry Khodyakov, Zachary Predmore, Christine Buttorff, Alice Kim
{"title":"Assessing the feasibility and likelihood of policy options to lower specialty drug costs.","authors":"Erin A Taylor, Dmitry Khodyakov, Zachary Predmore, Christine Buttorff, Alice Kim","doi":"10.1093/haschl/qxae118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Specialty drugs are high-cost medications often used to treat complex chronic conditions. Even with insurance coverage, patients may face very high out-of-pocket costs, which in turn may restrict access. While the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 included policies designed to reduce specialty drug costs, relatively few policies have been enacted during the past decade. In 2022-2023, we conducted a scoping literature review to identify a range of policy options and selected a set of 9 that have been regularly discussed or recently considered to present to an expert stakeholder panel to seek consensus on (1) the feasibility of implementing each policy and (2) its likely impact on drug costs. Experts rated only 1 policy highly on both feasibility and impact: grouping originator biologics and biosimilars under the same Medicare Part B reimbursement code. They rated 3 policies focused on setting payment limits as likely to have positive (downward) impact on costs but of uncertain feasibility. They considered 4 policies as uncertain on both criteria. Experts rated capping monthly out-of-pocket costs as feasible but unlikely to reduce specialty drug costs. Based on these results, we offer 4 recommendations to policymakers considering ways to reduce specialty drug costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":94025,"journal":{"name":"Health affairs scholar","volume":"2 10","pages":"qxae118"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11482634/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health affairs scholar","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxae118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Specialty drugs are high-cost medications often used to treat complex chronic conditions. Even with insurance coverage, patients may face very high out-of-pocket costs, which in turn may restrict access. While the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 included policies designed to reduce specialty drug costs, relatively few policies have been enacted during the past decade. In 2022-2023, we conducted a scoping literature review to identify a range of policy options and selected a set of 9 that have been regularly discussed or recently considered to present to an expert stakeholder panel to seek consensus on (1) the feasibility of implementing each policy and (2) its likely impact on drug costs. Experts rated only 1 policy highly on both feasibility and impact: grouping originator biologics and biosimilars under the same Medicare Part B reimbursement code. They rated 3 policies focused on setting payment limits as likely to have positive (downward) impact on costs but of uncertain feasibility. They considered 4 policies as uncertain on both criteria. Experts rated capping monthly out-of-pocket costs as feasible but unlikely to reduce specialty drug costs. Based on these results, we offer 4 recommendations to policymakers considering ways to reduce specialty drug costs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估降低特殊药品成本的政策方案的可行性和可能性。
特药是高成本药物,通常用于治疗复杂的慢性疾病。即使有保险,患者也可能面临非常高昂的自付费用,这反过来又会限制患者的用药。虽然《2022 年通货膨胀削减法案》包含了旨在降低特药成本的政策,但过去十年间颁布的政策相对较少。在 2022-2023 年,我们进行了一次范围性文献回顾,以确定一系列政策选择,并选择了 9 项定期讨论或近期考虑的政策,提交给利益相关者专家小组,以就以下两点寻求共识:(1)实施每项政策的可行性;(2)其对药物成本可能产生的影响。专家们仅对一项政策的可行性和影响给予了高度评价:将原研生物制剂和生物仿制药归入同一医疗保险 B 部分报销代码。他们将 3 项侧重于设定支付限额的政策评为可能对成本产生积极(向下)影响,但可行性不确定。他们认为 4 项政策在这两个标准上都不确定。专家们认为为每月自付费用设定上限是可行的,但不太可能降低特药费用。基于上述结果,我们向考虑如何降低特药成本的政策制定者提出了 4 项建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Correction to: No Surprises Act independent dispute resolution outcomes for emergency services. All-cause nursing home mortality rates have remained above pre-pandemic levels after accounting for decline in occupancy. Charting new territory: the early lessons in integrating social determinant of health (SDOH) measures into practice. Factors impacting vaccine uptake among adult Medicaid beneficiaries: a systematic literature review. Measuring hospital inpatient Procedure Access Inequality in the United States.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1