Osteochondral Regeneration With Anatomical Scaffold 3D-Printing-Design Considerations for Interface Integration.

David S Nedrelow, Jakob M Townsend, Michael S Detamore
{"title":"Osteochondral Regeneration With Anatomical Scaffold 3D-Printing-Design Considerations for Interface Integration.","authors":"David S Nedrelow, Jakob M Townsend, Michael S Detamore","doi":"10.1002/jbm.a.37804","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is a clinical need for osteochondral scaffolds with complex geometries for restoring articulating joint surfaces. To address that need, 3D-printing has enabled scaffolds to be created with anatomically shaped geometries and interconnected internal architectures, going beyond simple plug-shaped scaffolds that are limited to small, cylindrical, focal defects. A key challenge for restoring articulating joint surfaces with 3D-printed constructs is the mechanical loading environment, particularly to withstand delamination or mechanical failure. Although the mechanical performance of interfacial scaffolds is essential, interface strength testing has rarely been emphasized in prior studies with stratified scaffolds. In the pioneering studies where interface strength was assessed, varying methods were employed, which has made direct comparisons difficult. Therefore, the current review focused on 3D-printed scaffolds for osteochondral applications with an emphasis on interface integration and biomechanical evaluation. This 3D-printing focus included both multiphasic cylindrical scaffolds and anatomically shaped scaffolds. Combinations of different 3D-printing methods (e.g., fused deposition modeling, stereolithography, bioprinting with pneumatic extrusion of cell-laden hydrogels) have been employed in a handful of studies to integrate osteoinductive and chondroinductive regions into a single scaffold. Most 3D-printed multiphasic structures utilized either an interdigitating or a mechanical interlocking design to strengthen the construct interface and to prevent delamination during function. The most effective approach to combine phases may be to infill a robust 3D-printed osteal polymer with an interlocking chondral phase hydrogel. Mechanical interlocking is therefore recommended for scaling up multiphasic scaffold applications to larger anatomically shaped joint surface regeneration. For the evaluation of layer integration, the interface shear test is recommended to avoid artifacts or variability that may be associated with alternative approaches that require adhesives or mechanical grips. The 3D-printing literature with interfacial scaffolds provides a compelling foundation for continued work toward successful regeneration of injured or diseased osteochondral tissues in load-bearing joints such as the knee, hip, or temporomandibular joint.</p>","PeriodicalId":94066,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.37804","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is a clinical need for osteochondral scaffolds with complex geometries for restoring articulating joint surfaces. To address that need, 3D-printing has enabled scaffolds to be created with anatomically shaped geometries and interconnected internal architectures, going beyond simple plug-shaped scaffolds that are limited to small, cylindrical, focal defects. A key challenge for restoring articulating joint surfaces with 3D-printed constructs is the mechanical loading environment, particularly to withstand delamination or mechanical failure. Although the mechanical performance of interfacial scaffolds is essential, interface strength testing has rarely been emphasized in prior studies with stratified scaffolds. In the pioneering studies where interface strength was assessed, varying methods were employed, which has made direct comparisons difficult. Therefore, the current review focused on 3D-printed scaffolds for osteochondral applications with an emphasis on interface integration and biomechanical evaluation. This 3D-printing focus included both multiphasic cylindrical scaffolds and anatomically shaped scaffolds. Combinations of different 3D-printing methods (e.g., fused deposition modeling, stereolithography, bioprinting with pneumatic extrusion of cell-laden hydrogels) have been employed in a handful of studies to integrate osteoinductive and chondroinductive regions into a single scaffold. Most 3D-printed multiphasic structures utilized either an interdigitating or a mechanical interlocking design to strengthen the construct interface and to prevent delamination during function. The most effective approach to combine phases may be to infill a robust 3D-printed osteal polymer with an interlocking chondral phase hydrogel. Mechanical interlocking is therefore recommended for scaling up multiphasic scaffold applications to larger anatomically shaped joint surface regeneration. For the evaluation of layer integration, the interface shear test is recommended to avoid artifacts or variability that may be associated with alternative approaches that require adhesives or mechanical grips. The 3D-printing literature with interfacial scaffolds provides a compelling foundation for continued work toward successful regeneration of injured or diseased osteochondral tissues in load-bearing joints such as the knee, hip, or temporomandibular joint.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
骨软骨再生与解剖支架三维打印--界面整合的设计考虑因素
临床上需要具有复杂几何形状的骨软骨支架来修复关节表面。为了满足这一需求,三维打印技术已经能够制造出具有解剖学形状的几何结构和相互连接的内部结构的支架,超越了仅限于小的圆柱形病灶缺陷的简单塞形支架。利用三维打印构建物恢复关节表面的一个关键挑战是机械加载环境,尤其是承受分层或机械故障的能力。虽然界面支架的机械性能至关重要,但在之前的分层支架研究中,很少强调界面强度测试。在评估界面强度的先驱研究中,采用的方法各不相同,因此很难进行直接比较。因此,本综述重点关注用于骨软骨的三维打印支架,重点是界面整合和生物力学评估。该三维打印重点包括多相圆柱形支架和解剖形状支架。一些研究结合了不同的三维打印方法(如熔融沉积建模、立体光刻、生物打印与气动挤压含细胞的水凝胶),将骨诱导区和软骨诱导区整合到一个支架中。大多数三维打印多相结构都采用了相互咬合或机械联锁设计,以加强构建界面并防止功能过程中的分层。结合各相的最有效方法可能是在坚固的三维打印骨膜聚合物中填充互锁软骨相水凝胶。因此,建议采用机械互锁法将多相支架应用扩大到更大的解剖形状关节表面再生。在评估层整合时,建议采用界面剪切试验,以避免需要粘合剂或机械夹具的替代方法可能带来的伪影或变异。界面支架的三维打印文献为继续成功实现膝关节、髋关节或颞下颌关节等承重关节中受伤或病变骨软骨组织的再生提供了令人信服的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
PLLA Porous Scaffold as a 3D Breast Cancer Model to Investigate Drug Resistance. Topography-Mediated Induction of Epithelial Mesenchymal Transition via Alumina Textiles for Potential Wound Healing Applications. Biocompatibility and Antibacterial Potential of Tetrahedral Amorphous Carbon (ta-C) Coatings on CoCrMo Alloy for Articulating Implant Surfaces. Elastomeric and Conductive Nerve Conduits From Poly(Glycerol-Sebacate)/Carbon Nanofibers (PGS/CNFs). Innovative Marine-Sourced Hydroxyapatite, Chitosan, Collagen, and Gelatin for Eco-Friendly Bone and Cartilage Regeneration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1