Geometric neural network based on phase space for BCI-EEG decoding.

Igor Carrara, Bruno Aristimunha, Marie-Constance Corsi, Raphael Yokoingawa de Camargo, Sylvain Chevallier, Theodore Papadopoulo
{"title":"Geometric neural network based on phase space for BCI-EEG decoding.","authors":"Igor Carrara, Bruno Aristimunha, Marie-Constance Corsi, Raphael Yokoingawa de Camargo, Sylvain Chevallier, Theodore Papadopoulo","doi":"10.1088/1741-2552/ad88a2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>\\textbf{Objective:} &#xD;The integration of Deep Learning (DL) algorithms on brain signal analysis is still in its nascent stages compared to their success in fields like Computer Vision. This is particularly true for BCI, where the brain activity is decoded to control external devices without requiring muscle control.&#xD;Electroencephalography (EEG) is a widely adopted choice for designing BCI systems due to its non-invasive and cost-effective nature and excellent temporal resolution. Still, it comes at the expense of limited training data, poor signal-to-noise, and a large variability across and within-subject recordings. &#xD;Finally, setting up a BCI system with many electrodes takes a long time, hindering the widespread adoption of reliable DL architectures in BCIs outside research laboratories. To improve adoption, we need to improve user comfort using, for instance, reliable algorithms that operate with few electrodes. &#xD;\\textbf{Approach:} Our research aims to develop a DL algorithm that delivers effective results with a limited number of electrodes. Taking advantage of the Augmented Covariance Method and the framework of SPDNet, we propose the \\method{} architecture and analyze its performance and the interpretability of the results. The evaluation is conducted on 5-fold cross-validation, using only three electrodes positioned above the Motor Cortex. The methodology was tested on nearly 100 subjects from several open-source datasets using the Mother Of All BCI Benchmark (MOABB) framework. &#xD;\\textbf{Main results:} The results of our \\method{} demonstrate that the augmented approach combined with the SPDNet significantly outperforms all the current state-of-the-art DL architecture in MI decoding. &#xD;\\textbf{Significance:} This new architecture is explainable and with a low number of trainable parameters.</p>","PeriodicalId":94096,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neural engineering","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neural engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/ad88a2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

\textbf{Objective:} The integration of Deep Learning (DL) algorithms on brain signal analysis is still in its nascent stages compared to their success in fields like Computer Vision. This is particularly true for BCI, where the brain activity is decoded to control external devices without requiring muscle control. Electroencephalography (EEG) is a widely adopted choice for designing BCI systems due to its non-invasive and cost-effective nature and excellent temporal resolution. Still, it comes at the expense of limited training data, poor signal-to-noise, and a large variability across and within-subject recordings. Finally, setting up a BCI system with many electrodes takes a long time, hindering the widespread adoption of reliable DL architectures in BCIs outside research laboratories. To improve adoption, we need to improve user comfort using, for instance, reliable algorithms that operate with few electrodes. \textbf{Approach:} Our research aims to develop a DL algorithm that delivers effective results with a limited number of electrodes. Taking advantage of the Augmented Covariance Method and the framework of SPDNet, we propose the \method{} architecture and analyze its performance and the interpretability of the results. The evaluation is conducted on 5-fold cross-validation, using only three electrodes positioned above the Motor Cortex. The methodology was tested on nearly 100 subjects from several open-source datasets using the Mother Of All BCI Benchmark (MOABB) framework. \textbf{Main results:} The results of our \method{} demonstrate that the augmented approach combined with the SPDNet significantly outperforms all the current state-of-the-art DL architecture in MI decoding. \textbf{Significance:} This new architecture is explainable and with a low number of trainable parameters.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于相空间的几何神经网络用于 BCI-EEG 解码。
\textbf{Objective:} 与计算机视觉等领域的成功相比,深度学习(DL)算法与大脑信号分析的整合仍处于初级阶段。这一点在生物识别(BCI)领域尤为明显,在该领域,大脑活动被解码,从而无需肌肉控制即可控制外部设备。 脑电图(EEG)因其非侵入性、成本效益高以及出色的时间分辨率而被广泛用于设计生物识别(BCI)系统。然而,它的代价是训练数据有限、信噪比差、受试者之间和受试者内部记录差异大。最后,用许多电极建立一个 BCI 系统需要很长时间,这阻碍了可靠的 DL 架构在研究实验室以外的 BCIs 中的广泛应用。为了提高采用率,我们需要提高用户的舒适度,例如使用只需少量电极即可运行的可靠算法。我们的研究旨在开发一种DL算法,该算法能在电极数量有限的情况下提供有效的结果。利用增强协方差法和 SPDNet 框架的优势,我们提出了 \method{} 架构,并分析了其性能和结果的可解释性。评估是在 5 倍交叉验证的基础上进行的,只使用了位于运动皮层上方的三个电极。该方法使用MOABB(Mother Of All BCI Benchmark)框架在多个开源数据集的近100名受试者身上进行了测试。我们的方法{}的结果表明,结合 SPDNet 的增强方法在 MI 解码方面明显优于当前所有最先进的 DL 架构。这种新架构是可解释的,而且可训练的参数数量较少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Attention demands modulate brain electrical microstates and mental fatigue induced by simulated flight tasks. Temporal attention fusion network with custom loss function for EEG-fNIRS classification. Classification of hand movements from EEG using a FusionNet based LSTM network. Frequency-dependent phase entrainment of cortical cell types during tACS: computational modeling evidence. Patient-specific visual neglect severity estimation for stroke patients with neglect using EEG.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1