Differences in setting of initial dementia diagnosis among fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries.

Elizabeth M White, Thomas Bayer, Cyrus M Kosar, Christopher M Santostefano, Ulrike Muench, Hyesung Oh, Emily A Gadbois, Pedro L Gozalo, Momotazur Rahman
{"title":"Differences in setting of initial dementia diagnosis among fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries.","authors":"Elizabeth M White, Thomas Bayer, Cyrus M Kosar, Christopher M Santostefano, Ulrike Muench, Hyesung Oh, Emily A Gadbois, Pedro L Gozalo, Momotazur Rahman","doi":"10.1111/jgs.19236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Accurate and timely diagnosis of dementia is necessary to allow affected individuals to make informed decisions and access appropriate resources. When dementia goes undetected until a hospitalization or nursing home stay, this could reflect delayed diagnosis or misdiagnosis, and may reflect underlying disparities in healthcare access.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective cohort study, we used 2012-2020 Medicare claims and other administrative data to examine variation in setting of dementia diagnosis among fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries with an initial claims-based dementia diagnosis in 2016. We used multinomial logistic regression to evaluate the association of person and geographic factors with diagnosis location, and Cox proportional hazards regression to examine 4-year survival relative to diagnosis location.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 754,204 Medicare beneficiaries newly diagnosed with dementia in 2016, 60.3% were diagnosed in the community, 17.2% in hospitals, and 22.5% in nursing homes. Adjusted 4-year survival rates were significantly lower among those diagnosed in hospitals [-16.1 percentage points (95% CI: -17.0, -15.1)] and nursing homes [-16.8 percentage points (95% CI: -17.7, -15.9)], compared to those diagnosed in the community. Community-diagnosed beneficiaries were more often female, younger, Asian or Pacific Islander, Native American or Alaskan Native, Hispanic, had fewer baseline hospitalizations and higher homecare use, and resided in wealthier ZIP codes. Rural beneficiaries were more likely to be diagnosed in hospitals.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Many older adults are diagnosed with dementia in a hospital or nursing home. These individuals have significantly lower survival than those diagnosed in the community, which may indicate diagnosis during an acute illness or care transition, or at a later disease stage, all of which are suboptimal. These results highlight the need for improved dementia screening in the general population, particularly for individuals in rural areas and communities with higher social deprivation.</p>","PeriodicalId":94112,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.19236","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Accurate and timely diagnosis of dementia is necessary to allow affected individuals to make informed decisions and access appropriate resources. When dementia goes undetected until a hospitalization or nursing home stay, this could reflect delayed diagnosis or misdiagnosis, and may reflect underlying disparities in healthcare access.

Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we used 2012-2020 Medicare claims and other administrative data to examine variation in setting of dementia diagnosis among fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries with an initial claims-based dementia diagnosis in 2016. We used multinomial logistic regression to evaluate the association of person and geographic factors with diagnosis location, and Cox proportional hazards regression to examine 4-year survival relative to diagnosis location.

Results: Among 754,204 Medicare beneficiaries newly diagnosed with dementia in 2016, 60.3% were diagnosed in the community, 17.2% in hospitals, and 22.5% in nursing homes. Adjusted 4-year survival rates were significantly lower among those diagnosed in hospitals [-16.1 percentage points (95% CI: -17.0, -15.1)] and nursing homes [-16.8 percentage points (95% CI: -17.7, -15.9)], compared to those diagnosed in the community. Community-diagnosed beneficiaries were more often female, younger, Asian or Pacific Islander, Native American or Alaskan Native, Hispanic, had fewer baseline hospitalizations and higher homecare use, and resided in wealthier ZIP codes. Rural beneficiaries were more likely to be diagnosed in hospitals.

Conclusions: Many older adults are diagnosed with dementia in a hospital or nursing home. These individuals have significantly lower survival than those diagnosed in the community, which may indicate diagnosis during an acute illness or care transition, or at a later disease stage, all of which are suboptimal. These results highlight the need for improved dementia screening in the general population, particularly for individuals in rural areas and communities with higher social deprivation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
付费医疗保险受益人初次诊断痴呆症的背景差异。
背景:准确及时地诊断痴呆症对患者做出明智决策和获得适当资源十分必要。如果痴呆症直到住院或入住疗养院时才被发现,这可能反映出诊断延迟或误诊,也可能反映出医疗保健服务的潜在差异:在这项回顾性队列研究中,我们使用了 2012-2020 年的医疗保险报销单和其他管理数据,研究了 2016 年初次报销单诊断为痴呆症的付费医疗保险受益人中痴呆症诊断环境的变化。我们使用多叉逻辑回归评估了个人和地理因素与诊断地点的关联,并使用 Cox 比例危险回归检验了与诊断地点相关的 4 年生存率:在2016年新确诊为痴呆症的754204名医疗保险受益人中,60.3%在社区确诊,17.2%在医院确诊,22.5%在疗养院确诊。与在社区确诊的患者相比,在医院确诊的患者[-16.1个百分点(95% CI:-17.0,-15.1)]和疗养院确诊的患者[-16.8个百分点(95% CI:-17.7,-15.9)]调整后的4年生存率明显较低。社区确诊的受益人多为女性、年轻、亚裔或太平洋岛民、美国原住民或阿拉斯加原住民、西班牙裔、基线住院次数较少、家庭护理使用率较高、居住在较富裕的邮政编码内。农村受益人更有可能在医院确诊:结论:许多老年人是在医院或养老院被诊断出患有痴呆症的。这些人的存活率明显低于在社区确诊的患者,这可能表明他们是在急性疾病或护理过渡期间或疾病晚期确诊的,所有这些情况都不理想。这些结果凸显了在普通人群中改进痴呆症筛查的必要性,尤其是对农村地区和社会贫困程度较高的社区的痴呆症患者而言。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
The art of aging gracefully. Factors associated with language concordant cognitive testing among linguistically diverse older adults. Denosumab for osteoporosis in older adults in long-term care: A randomized trial. Change in frailty among older COVID-19 survivors. Stress tests and biomarkers of resilience: Proceedings of the second state of resilience science conference.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1