Experiences of older surgical patients and care partners during COVID-19: Lessons for future care

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Journal of the American Geriatrics Society Pub Date : 2024-10-16 DOI:10.1111/jgs.19212
Mark Iskandar BA, C. Ann Vitous MPH, Lillian Min MD, MSHS, Pasithorn A. Suwanabol MD, MS, Alexandra Norcott MD, MS
{"title":"Experiences of older surgical patients and care partners during COVID-19: Lessons for future care","authors":"Mark Iskandar BA,&nbsp;C. Ann Vitous MPH,&nbsp;Lillian Min MD, MSHS,&nbsp;Pasithorn A. Suwanabol MD, MS,&nbsp;Alexandra Norcott MD, MS","doi":"10.1111/jgs.19212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The COVID-19 pandemic introduced unique challenges for patients undergoing elective major surgery, including scheduling delays, a transition to virtual care, and frequent policy changes (e.g., visitor restrictions, discharge processes).<span><sup>1, 2</sup></span> These challenges disproportionally affected older adults (aged ≥65 years), who are more medically complex, less apt to use technology, and often involve friends and family members (i.e., care partners) in their surgical care.<span><sup>3, 4</sup></span> The dismantling of routine care processes and support systems provided an opportunity to evaluate perceptions and values of older surgical patients and their care partners both separately and as a patient–caregiver <i>dyad</i>.<span><sup>5</sup></span> Using preoperative and postoperative patient and care partner interviews, we sought to understand dyad experiences during major surgery to inform potential strategies to improve surgical care.</p><p>We used convenience sampling to identify dyads undergoing elective colorectal surgery (<i>n</i> = 10) from July 2020 to July 2021.<span><sup>6</sup></span> Participants were diverse across race, patient-care–partner relationship, and cognitive status as assessed using the Telephone Montreal Cognitive Assessment with scores &lt;18 indicating possible impairment (Table 1).<span><sup>7</sup></span> Verbal informed consent was obtained. Using Zoom, we interviewed dyad members separately before and after surgery. Interview domains centered on preparations, knowledge, and challenges. Interviews were audio recorded and transcribed. Using an inductive thematic analysis approach, two researchers independently coded transcripts without a preexisting coding schema. Following each interview, the full team met to review the codes and refine the codebook. Interviews continued until reaching data saturation. A final coding schema was then applied, and the full team analyzed the codes in segments for overarching themes. The University of Michigan Medicine Institutional Review Board approved this study.</p><p>Interviews revealed four dominant themes impacting surgical experiences (Table 2). (1) <i>Surgery was perceived as non-elective</i>: Due to discomfort or a perceived lack of alternative options, dyads viewed the surgery as urgently needed to maintain or improve their quality of life. Uncertainty around scheduling and delays led to distress among dyads. (2) <i>In-person meetings were valued</i>: Meetings in-person, especially with the surgeon, were critical for establishing trust. Additionally, virtual care was sometimes perceived as an indicator of lower surgical complexity and contributed to additional distress when recovery was prolonged. (3) <i>Importance of care partner involvement</i>: Patients felt the emotional, physical, and informational support of their care partner contributed to the success of their surgery. Care partner involvement also improved perceived patient recall and adherence to directions from the surgical team. Without care partners present in the hospital, many patients reported remaining in bed too long after surgery, patients with cognitive impairment often underreported symptoms, and dyads felt less able to elicit responses to their inquiries. (4) <i>Inconsistent communication</i>: Variation in how and when surgical team members communicated with dyads reduced confidence and preparedness for surgery. Due to the pandemic, visitation policies were frequently changed and inconsistently enforced, which introduced additional challenges for care partners seeking updates on the patient's care. This was especially distressing for dyads where the patient had cognitive impairment and depended on care partner involvement for managing their health.</p><p>Perspectives of patients undergoing surgery and their care partners during the COVID-19 pandemic revealed important opportunities to optimize surgical care for older adults. Participants viewed the surgery as non-elective; cited inconsistencies in communication; and placed high value on in-person meetings with their medical team and the inclusion of care partners. Other studies of older surgical patients during the pandemic have also highlighted a desire for better communication with the surgical team, the inclusion of caregivers, and a preference to meet their surgeon face-to-face before surgery as a mechanism to build trust.<span><sup>1, 8, 9</sup></span> A strength of our study is the inclusion of care partners who are often viewed as a vital component to a successful surgery. We have four recommendations for this growing population of patients undergoing surgery: (1) Teams should consider designating “elective surgery” as “scheduled surgery” to patients and their care partners to acknowledge the importance of the surgery to dyads. (2) Virtual care practices should offer opportunities for dyads to meet the surgeon in-person and specify that virtual meetings do not signify lower surgical complexity. (3) Surgical teams should advocate for care partner involvement from initial consultation to recovery at home to better support the patient and reinforce recommendations. (4) Health systems should develop reliable methods for care partners to communicate with the surgical team (e.g., a secure portal for asynchronous two-way communication regarding patients' daily progress) during hospitalization. Such recommendations may better support dyads undergoing major surgery.</p><p>All authors contributed to the study concept and design, drafting of the manuscript, and reviewing the manuscript for critical feedback and approval of the final version for publication.</p><p>Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Foundation (002816), VA Ann Arbor | Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center (GRECC).</p><p>No conflicts of interest declared.</p><p>The sponsor had no role in the study design, data analysis, or preparation of the manuscript.</p>","PeriodicalId":17240,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":"73 2","pages":"639-642"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jgs.19212","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://agsjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jgs.19212","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic introduced unique challenges for patients undergoing elective major surgery, including scheduling delays, a transition to virtual care, and frequent policy changes (e.g., visitor restrictions, discharge processes).1, 2 These challenges disproportionally affected older adults (aged ≥65 years), who are more medically complex, less apt to use technology, and often involve friends and family members (i.e., care partners) in their surgical care.3, 4 The dismantling of routine care processes and support systems provided an opportunity to evaluate perceptions and values of older surgical patients and their care partners both separately and as a patient–caregiver dyad.5 Using preoperative and postoperative patient and care partner interviews, we sought to understand dyad experiences during major surgery to inform potential strategies to improve surgical care.

We used convenience sampling to identify dyads undergoing elective colorectal surgery (n = 10) from July 2020 to July 2021.6 Participants were diverse across race, patient-care–partner relationship, and cognitive status as assessed using the Telephone Montreal Cognitive Assessment with scores <18 indicating possible impairment (Table 1).7 Verbal informed consent was obtained. Using Zoom, we interviewed dyad members separately before and after surgery. Interview domains centered on preparations, knowledge, and challenges. Interviews were audio recorded and transcribed. Using an inductive thematic analysis approach, two researchers independently coded transcripts without a preexisting coding schema. Following each interview, the full team met to review the codes and refine the codebook. Interviews continued until reaching data saturation. A final coding schema was then applied, and the full team analyzed the codes in segments for overarching themes. The University of Michigan Medicine Institutional Review Board approved this study.

Interviews revealed four dominant themes impacting surgical experiences (Table 2). (1) Surgery was perceived as non-elective: Due to discomfort or a perceived lack of alternative options, dyads viewed the surgery as urgently needed to maintain or improve their quality of life. Uncertainty around scheduling and delays led to distress among dyads. (2) In-person meetings were valued: Meetings in-person, especially with the surgeon, were critical for establishing trust. Additionally, virtual care was sometimes perceived as an indicator of lower surgical complexity and contributed to additional distress when recovery was prolonged. (3) Importance of care partner involvement: Patients felt the emotional, physical, and informational support of their care partner contributed to the success of their surgery. Care partner involvement also improved perceived patient recall and adherence to directions from the surgical team. Without care partners present in the hospital, many patients reported remaining in bed too long after surgery, patients with cognitive impairment often underreported symptoms, and dyads felt less able to elicit responses to their inquiries. (4) Inconsistent communication: Variation in how and when surgical team members communicated with dyads reduced confidence and preparedness for surgery. Due to the pandemic, visitation policies were frequently changed and inconsistently enforced, which introduced additional challenges for care partners seeking updates on the patient's care. This was especially distressing for dyads where the patient had cognitive impairment and depended on care partner involvement for managing their health.

Perspectives of patients undergoing surgery and their care partners during the COVID-19 pandemic revealed important opportunities to optimize surgical care for older adults. Participants viewed the surgery as non-elective; cited inconsistencies in communication; and placed high value on in-person meetings with their medical team and the inclusion of care partners. Other studies of older surgical patients during the pandemic have also highlighted a desire for better communication with the surgical team, the inclusion of caregivers, and a preference to meet their surgeon face-to-face before surgery as a mechanism to build trust.1, 8, 9 A strength of our study is the inclusion of care partners who are often viewed as a vital component to a successful surgery. We have four recommendations for this growing population of patients undergoing surgery: (1) Teams should consider designating “elective surgery” as “scheduled surgery” to patients and their care partners to acknowledge the importance of the surgery to dyads. (2) Virtual care practices should offer opportunities for dyads to meet the surgeon in-person and specify that virtual meetings do not signify lower surgical complexity. (3) Surgical teams should advocate for care partner involvement from initial consultation to recovery at home to better support the patient and reinforce recommendations. (4) Health systems should develop reliable methods for care partners to communicate with the surgical team (e.g., a secure portal for asynchronous two-way communication regarding patients' daily progress) during hospitalization. Such recommendations may better support dyads undergoing major surgery.

All authors contributed to the study concept and design, drafting of the manuscript, and reviewing the manuscript for critical feedback and approval of the final version for publication.

Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Foundation (002816), VA Ann Arbor | Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center (GRECC).

No conflicts of interest declared.

The sponsor had no role in the study design, data analysis, or preparation of the manuscript.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
老年手术患者和护理伙伴在 COVID-19 期间的经历:对未来护理的启示。
COVID-19大流行给接受选择性大手术的患者带来了独特的挑战,包括安排延误、向虚拟护理过渡以及频繁的政策变化(例如访客限制、出院流程)。1,2这些挑战对老年人(年龄≥65岁)的影响尤为严重,他们的医疗情况更为复杂,不太容易使用技术,并且经常让朋友和家人(即护理伙伴)参与手术护理。常规护理过程和支持系统的解体提供了一个机会来评估老年外科患者及其护理伙伴的看法和价值观,既可以单独评估,也可以作为患者-护理者的双重评估通过术前和术后患者和护理伙伴访谈,我们试图了解大手术期间的双重经历,以告知改善手术护理的潜在策略。在2020年7月至2020年7月期间,我们采用方便抽样的方法确定了接受选择性结直肠手术的夫妇(n = 10)。参与者在种族、患者-护理-伴侣关系和使用蒙特利尔电话认知评估评估的认知状态方面存在差异,得分&lt;18表示可能的损害(表1)获得口头知情同意。使用Zoom,我们在手术前后分别采访了两组成员。面试领域集中在准备、知识和挑战上。采访录音和文字记录。使用归纳主题分析方法,两位研究人员独立编码转录本没有预先存在的编码模式。在每次面试之后,整个团队开会审查代码并完善代码本。采访一直持续到数据饱和。然后应用最终的编码模式,整个团队根据总体主题对代码进行分段分析。密歇根大学医学机构审查委员会批准了这项研究。访谈揭示了影响手术体验的四个主要主题(表2)。(1)手术被认为是非选择性的:由于不适或缺乏替代选择,夫妻认为手术是迫切需要的,以维持或改善他们的生活质量。日程安排和延误的不确定性导致了二人组的苦恼。(2)面对面的会面很重要:面对面的会面,尤其是与外科医生的会面,对于建立信任至关重要。此外,虚拟护理有时被认为是手术复杂性较低的一个指标,并在恢复时间延长时造成额外的痛苦。(3)护理伙伴参与的重要性:患者认为护理伙伴的情感、身体和信息支持有助于手术的成功。护理伙伴的参与也提高了患者的记忆和对手术小组指示的依从性。在没有护理伙伴在场的情况下,许多患者报告手术后躺在床上的时间过长,有认知障碍的患者经常少报症状,而对他们的询问感到无法得到回应。(4)沟通不一致:手术团队成员与双体沟通的方式和时间的差异降低了对手术的信心和准备。由于大流行,探视政策经常改变,执行不一致,这给寻求患者护理最新情况的护理伙伴带来了额外的挑战。这对于患有认知障碍并依赖护理伙伴参与管理其健康的二人组来说尤其令人痛苦。2019冠状病毒病大流行期间接受手术的患者及其护理伙伴的观点揭示了优化老年人手术护理的重要机遇。参与者认为手术是非选择性的;引用的沟通不一致;并高度重视与医疗团队的面对面会议以及护理伙伴的参与。大流行期间对老年外科患者的其他研究也强调了与外科团队更好沟通的愿望,包括护理人员,以及在手术前与外科医生面对面会面的偏好,以此作为建立信任的机制。1,8,9我们研究的一个优势是纳入了护理伙伴,他们通常被视为手术成功的重要组成部分。对于越来越多的接受手术的患者,我们有四点建议:(1)团队应该考虑将“选择性手术”指定为“预定手术”,以承认手术对夫妻的重要性。(2)虚拟护理实践应该为患者提供与外科医生面对面交流的机会,并明确虚拟会议并不意味着手术复杂性降低。(3)外科团队应倡导护理伙伴参与,从最初的会诊到家庭康复,以更好地支持患者并加强建议。 (4)卫生系统应开发可靠的方法,使护理伙伴与外科团队在住院期间进行沟通(例如,一个关于患者日常进展的异步双向沟通的安全门户)。这样的建议可能会更好地支持接受大手术的双性恋。所有作者都参与了研究概念和设计,起草手稿,审查手稿以获得关键反馈并批准最终版本的出版。蓝十字蓝盾密歇根基金会(002816),VA安娜堡|老年研究教育和临床中心(grec)。没有宣布利益冲突。申办者在研究设计、数据分析或手稿准备中没有任何作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
6.30%
发文量
504
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS) is the go-to journal for clinical aging research. We provide a diverse, interprofessional community of healthcare professionals with the latest insights on geriatrics education, clinical practice, and public policy—all supporting the high-quality, person-centered care essential to our well-being as we age. Since the publication of our first edition in 1953, JAGS has remained one of the oldest and most impactful journals dedicated exclusively to gerontology and geriatrics.
期刊最新文献
NOTICES Cover A Thank You to JAGS Reviewers The Role of Brain Structure in Explaining Physical Functioning in Male Veterans With Impaired Kidney Function Sensorimotor Impairment and Incident Dementia in the US Medicare Beneficiaries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1