Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Breast Nodules by Conventional Ultrasound in Combination with S-Detect Technology and Elastic Imaging.

Boyuan Xing, Chenghui Fu, Zishu Yang
{"title":"Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Breast Nodules by Conventional Ultrasound in Combination with S-Detect Technology and Elastic Imaging.","authors":"Boyuan Xing, Chenghui Fu, Zishu Yang","doi":"10.29271/jcpsp.2024.10.1154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the diagnostic value of conventional ultrasound combined with S-Detect and elastic imaging technology in differentiating between benign and malignant breast nodules.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Observational study. Place and Duration of the Study: Department of Ultrasound Imaging, Yichang Central People's Hospital, Yichang, China, from October 2019 to October 2022.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>The study included all breast nodules diagnosed using ultrasound, with patients undergoing conventional ultrasound for BI-RADS classification, elasticity score, and S-Detect examination. Benign and malignant breast nodules were classified according to the three tests and their combinations. The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and area under curve (AUV) of those alone and combinations were calculated and compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the three methods, BI-RADS, elasticity score, and S-Detect, BI-RADS had the highest accuracy (89.29%), elasticity score had the highest specificity (96.20%), and S-Detect had the highest sensitivity (93.92%). The accuracy of combined groups were higher than that of the single group. When combined with elasticity score, the AUC of the new BI-RADS increased from 0.882 to 0.917 (p <0.001); and combined with S-Detect, the AUC of the new BI-RADS increased from 0.882 to 0.927 (p <0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The combination of conventional ultrasound BI-RADS classification with elasticity score or S-Detect technology has a higher diagnostic efficacy for breast nodules, which can improve breast cancer detection and provide valuable diagnostic evidence for clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Key words: </strong>S-Detect technology, Ultrasound elastic imaging, Elasticity scoring, Elasticity strain ratio value, Breast tumour.</p>","PeriodicalId":94116,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan : JCPSP","volume":"34 10","pages":"1154-1157"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan : JCPSP","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29271/jcpsp.2024.10.1154","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To determine the diagnostic value of conventional ultrasound combined with S-Detect and elastic imaging technology in differentiating between benign and malignant breast nodules.

Study design: Observational study. Place and Duration of the Study: Department of Ultrasound Imaging, Yichang Central People's Hospital, Yichang, China, from October 2019 to October 2022.

Methodology: The study included all breast nodules diagnosed using ultrasound, with patients undergoing conventional ultrasound for BI-RADS classification, elasticity score, and S-Detect examination. Benign and malignant breast nodules were classified according to the three tests and their combinations. The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and area under curve (AUV) of those alone and combinations were calculated and compared.

Results: Of the three methods, BI-RADS, elasticity score, and S-Detect, BI-RADS had the highest accuracy (89.29%), elasticity score had the highest specificity (96.20%), and S-Detect had the highest sensitivity (93.92%). The accuracy of combined groups were higher than that of the single group. When combined with elasticity score, the AUC of the new BI-RADS increased from 0.882 to 0.917 (p <0.001); and combined with S-Detect, the AUC of the new BI-RADS increased from 0.882 to 0.927 (p <0.001).

Conclusion: The combination of conventional ultrasound BI-RADS classification with elasticity score or S-Detect technology has a higher diagnostic efficacy for breast nodules, which can improve breast cancer detection and provide valuable diagnostic evidence for clinical practice.

Key words: S-Detect technology, Ultrasound elastic imaging, Elasticity scoring, Elasticity strain ratio value, Breast tumour.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
传统超声结合 S-Detect 技术和弹性成像诊断良性和恶性乳腺结节。
研究目的确定传统超声结合 S-Detect 和弹性成像技术在区分乳腺结节良性和恶性方面的诊断价值:观察性研究。研究地点和时间:宜昌市中心人民医院超声影像科,2019年10月至2022年10月:研究纳入所有使用超声诊断的乳腺结节,患者接受常规超声BI-RADS分级、弹性评分和S-Detect检查。良性和恶性乳腺结节根据三种检查及其组合进行分类。计算并比较了单独检测和组合检测的诊断敏感性、特异性、准确性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值和曲线下面积(AUV):在 BI-RADS、弹性评分和 S-Detect 三种方法中,BI-RADS 的准确性最高(89.29%),弹性评分的特异性最高(96.20%),S-Detect 的灵敏度最高(93.92%)。综合组的准确率高于单一组。当结合弹性评分时,新 BI-RADS 的 AUC 从 0.882 增加到 0.917(p 结论:新 BI-RADS 的 AUC 从 0.882 增加到 0.917:将传统超声 BI-RADS 分级与弹性评分或 S-Detect 技术相结合,对乳腺结节有更高的诊断效果,可提高乳腺癌的检出率,为临床实践提供有价值的诊断依据:S-Detect 技术 超声弹性成像 弹性评分 弹性应变比值 乳腺肿瘤
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Application of Multi-Slice Spiral CT Renal Angiography Combined with Intraoperative Ultrasound in Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy. Association of Vitamin D with Haematological Inflammatory Indices in Patients with Back Pain. Beyond Laparoscopy: Embracing a Scarless Solution for Gallstones "The Notes". Clinical Effectiveness of Green Tea Extracts as a Local Haemostatic Agent Following Mandibular Molar Extraction. Congenital Anomalies of the Kidney and Urinary Tract in Patients with Hirschsprung Disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1