Effects of profit-driven cropland expansion and conservation policies

IF 25.7 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Nature Sustainability Pub Date : 2024-08-13 DOI:10.1038/s41893-024-01410-x
Julia M. Schneider, Ruth Delzeit, Christian Neumann, Tobias Heimann, Ralf Seppelt, Franziska Schuenemann, Mareike Söder, Wolfram Mauser, Florian Zabel
{"title":"Effects of profit-driven cropland expansion and conservation policies","authors":"Julia M. Schneider, Ruth Delzeit, Christian Neumann, Tobias Heimann, Ralf Seppelt, Franziska Schuenemann, Mareike Söder, Wolfram Mauser, Florian Zabel","doi":"10.1038/s41893-024-01410-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Biodiversity protection and climate change mitigation require understanding of the potential trade-offs from possible future cropland expansion. Here we apply an interdisciplinary coupled modelling approach to identify areas under the globally highest expansion pressure of 1% to 30% future cropland expansion by 2030. On the basis of recent projections, we analyse the potential impacts on agricultural markets, biodiversity and CO2 land-use emissions of a 3.6% global cropland expansion scenario by 2030. We assess how global conservation policies could shift expansion pressure and alter the ensuing impacts. Our results confirm that the areas under pressure are located mainly in the tropics. A cropland expansion of 3.6% increases global agricultural production by 2%. The associated land-use change generates 17.1 Gt CO2 emissions and leads to a further decline in biodiversity intactness of 26% in the expanded areas. Conservation policies prohibiting the expansion into forests, wetlands and existing protected areas could substantially reduce emissions from land-use change, maintaining global agricultural productivity, but might have contrary effects on biodiversity. Strategic land-use planning could help reconcile agricultural production with environmental protection. The map of areas under expansion pressure presented here could contribute to improving the spatial planning of conservation measures. Understanding the various and multiple trade-offs of land-use changes and cropland expansion can contribute to more sustainable policies. A study explores future scenarios of cropland expansion along with the trade-offs in agricultural production and markets, biodiversity and CO2 emissions.","PeriodicalId":19056,"journal":{"name":"Nature Sustainability","volume":"7 10","pages":"1335-1347"},"PeriodicalIF":25.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41893-024-01410-x","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Biodiversity protection and climate change mitigation require understanding of the potential trade-offs from possible future cropland expansion. Here we apply an interdisciplinary coupled modelling approach to identify areas under the globally highest expansion pressure of 1% to 30% future cropland expansion by 2030. On the basis of recent projections, we analyse the potential impacts on agricultural markets, biodiversity and CO2 land-use emissions of a 3.6% global cropland expansion scenario by 2030. We assess how global conservation policies could shift expansion pressure and alter the ensuing impacts. Our results confirm that the areas under pressure are located mainly in the tropics. A cropland expansion of 3.6% increases global agricultural production by 2%. The associated land-use change generates 17.1 Gt CO2 emissions and leads to a further decline in biodiversity intactness of 26% in the expanded areas. Conservation policies prohibiting the expansion into forests, wetlands and existing protected areas could substantially reduce emissions from land-use change, maintaining global agricultural productivity, but might have contrary effects on biodiversity. Strategic land-use planning could help reconcile agricultural production with environmental protection. The map of areas under expansion pressure presented here could contribute to improving the spatial planning of conservation measures. Understanding the various and multiple trade-offs of land-use changes and cropland expansion can contribute to more sustainable policies. A study explores future scenarios of cropland expansion along with the trade-offs in agricultural production and markets, biodiversity and CO2 emissions.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利润驱动的耕地扩张和保护政策的影响
保护生物多样性和减缓气候变化需要了解未来耕地扩张可能带来的权衡。在此,我们采用跨学科耦合建模方法,确定了全球耕地扩张压力最大的地区,即到 2030 年耕地扩张 1%-30%。根据最近的预测,我们分析了到 2030 年全球耕地扩张 3.6% 的情景对农业市场、生物多样性和二氧化碳土地利用排放的潜在影响。我们评估了全球保护政策如何转移扩张压力并改变随之而来的影响。我们的结果证实,受到压力的地区主要位于热带地区。耕地面积扩大 3.6%,全球农业产量增加 2%。与此相关的土地利用变化会产生 17.1 千兆吨二氧化碳排放,并导致扩大地区的生物多样性完整性进一步下降 26%。禁止向森林、湿地和现有保护区扩张的保护政策可大幅减少土地利用变化产生的排放,维持全球农业生产率,但可能会对生物多样性产生相反的影响。战略性土地利用规划有助于协调农业生产与环境保护之间的关系。本文介绍的面临扩张压力地区的地图有助于改善保护措施的空间规划。了解土地利用变化和耕地扩张的各种多重权衡,有助于制定更具可持续性的政策。一项研究探讨了未来耕地扩张的情景,以及农业生产和市场、生物多样性和二氧化碳排放方面的权衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nature Sustainability
Nature Sustainability Energy-Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
CiteScore
41.90
自引率
1.10%
发文量
159
期刊介绍: Nature Sustainability aims to facilitate cross-disciplinary dialogues and bring together research fields that contribute to understanding how we organize our lives in a finite world and the impacts of our actions. Nature Sustainability will not only publish fundamental research but also significant investigations into policies and solutions for ensuring human well-being now and in the future.Its ultimate goal is to address the greatest challenges of our time.
期刊最新文献
Pick the low-hanging fruit first Landscape of litigation in the United States Outcomes and policy focus of environmental litigation in the United States Balancing rights Impacts of climate litigation on firm value
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1