Selection bias obfuscates the discovery of fast radio burst sources

IF 48.5 1区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES Nature Pub Date : 2024-10-23 DOI:10.1038/s41586-024-08065-w
Mohit Bhardwaj, Jimin Lee, Kevin Ji
{"title":"Selection bias obfuscates the discovery of fast radio burst sources","authors":"Mohit Bhardwaj, Jimin Lee, Kevin Ji","doi":"10.1038/s41586-024-08065-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fast radio bursts (FRBs) are a newly discovered class of extragalactic radio transients characterized by their high energy and short duration (from microseconds to milliseconds)1. The physical origin of these FRBs remains unknown and is a subject of ongoing research, with magnetars emerging as leading candidates2,3. Previous studies have used various methodologies to address the problem of FRB origin, including demographic analyses of FRB host galaxies and their local environments4–6, assessments of FRB rate evolution with redshift7–9 and searches for proposed multi-messenger FRB counterparts10. However, these studies are susceptible to substantial biases stemming from unaccounted radio and optical selection effects. Here we present empirical evidence for a substantial selection bias against detecting FRBs in galaxies with large inclination angles (edge-on) using a sample of hosts identified for FRBs discovered by untargeted surveys. This inclination-related bias probably leads to a significant underestimation (by about a factor of two) of the FRB rates reported in the literature and disfavours globular clusters as the dominant origin of FRB sources, as previously speculated6. These conclusions have important implications for FRB progenitor models and targeted FRB follow-up strategies. We further investigate the impact of this bias on the relative rate of FRBs in different host environments. Our analysis suggests that scattering in FRB hosts is probably responsible for the observed bias11,12. However, a larger sample of localized FRBs is required to robustly quantify the contribution of scattering to the inclination-related selection bias. The chances of detecting fast radio bursts from a galaxy may be affected by its inclination angle, showing a potential selection bias in determining the sources of the bursts.","PeriodicalId":18787,"journal":{"name":"Nature","volume":"634 8036","pages":"1065-1069"},"PeriodicalIF":48.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-08065-w","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fast radio bursts (FRBs) are a newly discovered class of extragalactic radio transients characterized by their high energy and short duration (from microseconds to milliseconds)1. The physical origin of these FRBs remains unknown and is a subject of ongoing research, with magnetars emerging as leading candidates2,3. Previous studies have used various methodologies to address the problem of FRB origin, including demographic analyses of FRB host galaxies and their local environments4–6, assessments of FRB rate evolution with redshift7–9 and searches for proposed multi-messenger FRB counterparts10. However, these studies are susceptible to substantial biases stemming from unaccounted radio and optical selection effects. Here we present empirical evidence for a substantial selection bias against detecting FRBs in galaxies with large inclination angles (edge-on) using a sample of hosts identified for FRBs discovered by untargeted surveys. This inclination-related bias probably leads to a significant underestimation (by about a factor of two) of the FRB rates reported in the literature and disfavours globular clusters as the dominant origin of FRB sources, as previously speculated6. These conclusions have important implications for FRB progenitor models and targeted FRB follow-up strategies. We further investigate the impact of this bias on the relative rate of FRBs in different host environments. Our analysis suggests that scattering in FRB hosts is probably responsible for the observed bias11,12. However, a larger sample of localized FRBs is required to robustly quantify the contribution of scattering to the inclination-related selection bias. The chances of detecting fast radio bursts from a galaxy may be affected by its inclination angle, showing a potential selection bias in determining the sources of the bursts.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
选择偏差阻碍了快速射电暴源的发现
快速射电暴(FRBs)是一类新发现的河外射电瞬变现象,其特点是能量高、持续时间短(从微秒到毫秒不等)1。这些 FRB 的物理起源仍然未知,是一个正在进行的研究课题,磁星成为主要候选者2,3。以往的研究采用了各种方法来解决 FRB 起源问题,包括 FRB 星系及其局域环境的人口分析4,5,6,FRB 率随红移演化的评估7,8,9,以及对拟议的多信使 FRB 对应体的搜索10。然而,这些研究很容易受到未考虑的射电和光学选择效应的严重影响。在这里,我们利用非目标巡天发现的 FRB 的宿主样本,提出了实证证据,证明在倾角较大的星系(边缘上)中探测 FRB 存在很大的选择偏差。这种与倾角有关的偏差很可能会导致文献中报告的 FRB 发生率被大大低估(大约低估了 2 倍),并且不利于将球状星团作为 FRB 源的主要来源,正如以前推测的那样6。这些结论对 FRB 起源模型和有针对性的 FRB 跟踪策略具有重要意义。我们进一步研究了这种偏差对不同宿主环境中 FRB 相对速率的影响。我们的分析表明,FRB 宿主中的散射可能是造成观测到的偏差的原因11,12。然而,我们还需要更多的局部FRB样本,才能有力地量化散射对倾角相关选择偏差的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nature
Nature 综合性期刊-综合性期刊
CiteScore
90.00
自引率
1.20%
发文量
3652
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Nature is a prestigious international journal that publishes peer-reviewed research in various scientific and technological fields. The selection of articles is based on criteria such as originality, importance, interdisciplinary relevance, timeliness, accessibility, elegance, and surprising conclusions. In addition to showcasing significant scientific advances, Nature delivers rapid, authoritative, insightful news, and interpretation of current and upcoming trends impacting science, scientists, and the broader public. The journal serves a dual purpose: firstly, to promptly share noteworthy scientific advances and foster discussions among scientists, and secondly, to ensure the swift dissemination of scientific results globally, emphasizing their significance for knowledge, culture, and daily life.
期刊最新文献
Updates to the ‘bible’ for mental-health conditions will miss the mark — is it time to ditch the DSM? What’s behind ‘teensplaining’? Scientists should study this adolescent behaviour Brain differences between sexes get more pronounced from puberty The funding system needs fixing — but it’s not a ‘waste of time and money’ Statistical approximation is not general intelligence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1