The Geometry of Flow: Advancing Predictions of River Geometry With Multi-Model Machine Learning

IF 4.6 1区 地球科学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Water Resources Research Pub Date : 2024-10-23 DOI:10.1029/2023wr036733
Shuyu Y. Chang, Zahra Ghahremani, Laura Manuel, Seyed Mohammad Hassan Erfani, Chaopeng Shen, Sagy Cohen, Kimberly J. Van Meter, Jennifer L. Pierce, Ehab A. Meselhe, Erfan Goharian
{"title":"The Geometry of Flow: Advancing Predictions of River Geometry With Multi-Model Machine Learning","authors":"Shuyu Y. Chang, Zahra Ghahremani, Laura Manuel, Seyed Mohammad Hassan Erfani, Chaopeng Shen, Sagy Cohen, Kimberly J. Van Meter, Jennifer L. Pierce, Ehab A. Meselhe, Erfan Goharian","doi":"10.1029/2023wr036733","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hydraulic geometry parameters describing river hydrogeomorphic relationships are critical for determining a channel's capacity to convey water and sediment which is important for flood forecasting. Although well-established, power-law hydraulic geometry curves have been widely used to understand riverine systems and mapping flooding inundation worldwide for the past 70 years, we have become increasingly aware of their limitations. In the present study, we have moved beyond these traditional power-law relationships, testing the ability of machine-learning models to provide improved predictions of river width and depth. For this work, we have used an unprecedentedly large river measurement data set (HYDRoSWOT) as well as a suite of watershed predictor data to develop novel data-driven approaches to better estimate river geometries over the contiguous United States (CONUS). Our Random Forest, XGBoost, and neural network models out-performed the traditional, regionalized power law-based hydraulic geometry equations for both width and depth, providing R-squared values of as high as 0.75 for width and as high as 0.67 for depth, compared with R-squared values of 0.45 for width and 0.18 for depth from the regional hydraulic geometry equations. Our results also show diverse performance outcomes across stream orders and geographical regions for the different machine-learning models, demonstrating the value of using multi-model approaches to maximize the predictability of river geometry. The developed models have been used to create the newly publicly available STREAM-geo data set, which provides river width, depth, width/depth ratio, and river and stream surface area (%RSSA) for nearly 2.7 million NHDPlus stream reaches across the contiguous US.","PeriodicalId":23799,"journal":{"name":"Water Resources Research","volume":"194 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Resources Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1029/2023wr036733","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hydraulic geometry parameters describing river hydrogeomorphic relationships are critical for determining a channel's capacity to convey water and sediment which is important for flood forecasting. Although well-established, power-law hydraulic geometry curves have been widely used to understand riverine systems and mapping flooding inundation worldwide for the past 70 years, we have become increasingly aware of their limitations. In the present study, we have moved beyond these traditional power-law relationships, testing the ability of machine-learning models to provide improved predictions of river width and depth. For this work, we have used an unprecedentedly large river measurement data set (HYDRoSWOT) as well as a suite of watershed predictor data to develop novel data-driven approaches to better estimate river geometries over the contiguous United States (CONUS). Our Random Forest, XGBoost, and neural network models out-performed the traditional, regionalized power law-based hydraulic geometry equations for both width and depth, providing R-squared values of as high as 0.75 for width and as high as 0.67 for depth, compared with R-squared values of 0.45 for width and 0.18 for depth from the regional hydraulic geometry equations. Our results also show diverse performance outcomes across stream orders and geographical regions for the different machine-learning models, demonstrating the value of using multi-model approaches to maximize the predictability of river geometry. The developed models have been used to create the newly publicly available STREAM-geo data set, which provides river width, depth, width/depth ratio, and river and stream surface area (%RSSA) for nearly 2.7 million NHDPlus stream reaches across the contiguous US.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
流的几何:利用多模型机器学习推进河流几何预测
描述河流水文地质关系的水力几何参数对于确定河道输送水和泥沙的能力至关重要,这对洪水预报也很重要。尽管过去 70 年来,成熟的幂律水力几何曲线一直被广泛用于理解河流系统和绘制全球洪水淹没图,但我们越来越意识到它们的局限性。在本研究中,我们超越了这些传统的幂律关系,测试了机器学习模型对河流宽度和深度进行改进预测的能力。在这项工作中,我们使用了史无前例的大型河流测量数据集(HYDRoSWOT)以及一套流域预测数据,开发了新颖的数据驱动方法,以更好地估计美国毗连地区(CONUS)的河流几何形状。我们的随机森林、XGBoost 和神经网络模型在宽度和深度方面都优于传统的、基于区域化幂律的水力几何方程,在宽度方面的 R 平方值高达 0.75,在深度方面的 R 平方值高达 0.67,而区域水力几何方程在宽度方面的 R 平方值为 0.45,在深度方面的 R 平方值为 0.18。我们的研究结果还显示,不同的机器学习模型在不同的河流等级和地理区域具有不同的性能结果,这证明了使用多模型方法最大限度地预测河流几何形状的价值。所开发的模型已被用于创建新近公开的 STREAM-geo 数据集,该数据集提供了美国毗连地区近 270 万 NHDPlus 河段的河宽、河深、河宽/河深比以及河流和溪流表面积(%RSSA)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Water Resources Research
Water Resources Research 环境科学-湖沼学
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
13.00%
发文量
599
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: Water Resources Research (WRR) is an interdisciplinary journal that focuses on hydrology and water resources. It publishes original research in the natural and social sciences of water. It emphasizes the role of water in the Earth system, including physical, chemical, biological, and ecological processes in water resources research and management, including social, policy, and public health implications. It encompasses observational, experimental, theoretical, analytical, numerical, and data-driven approaches that advance the science of water and its management. Submissions are evaluated for their novelty, accuracy, significance, and broader implications of the findings.
期刊最新文献
A Three-Stage Partitioning Framework for Modeling Mean Annual Groundwater Evapotranspiration Causal Discovery Analysis Reveals Global Sources of Predictability for Regional Flash Droughts Bridging the Gap Between Top-Down and Bottom-Up Climate Vulnerability Assessments: Process Informed Exploratory Scenarios Identify System-Based Water Resource Vulnerabilities Combining a Multi-Lake Model Ensemble and a Multi-Domain CORDEX Climate Data Ensemble for Assessing Climate Change Impacts on Lake Sevan Impact of Forest Dieback on Hydrology and Nitrogen Export Using a New Dynamic Water Quality Model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1