Gendered Administrative Burden: Regulating Gendered Bodies, Labor, and Identity

IF 5.2 1区 管理学 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory Pub Date : 2024-10-23 DOI:10.1093/jopart/muae021
Pamela Herd, Donald Moynihan
{"title":"Gendered Administrative Burden: Regulating Gendered Bodies, Labor, and Identity","authors":"Pamela Herd, Donald Moynihan","doi":"10.1093/jopart/muae021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Gendered burdens are experiences of coercive and controlling state actions that directly regulate gendered bodies, labor, and identity. It’s not simply about preventing access to rights and benefits, it’s about control and coercion. Gendered burdens generate gender inequality through four mechanisms. First, administrative burdens regulate reproductive bodies, legitimating the state’s direct control over reproductive health care, including abortions, with consequent implications for peoples’ health. Second, burdens require reproductive labor, shifting unpaid and underpaid reproductive labor onto women as the policies that support such labor tend to have high administrative burden that impede access. Third, gendered burdens restrict reproductive labor, impeding the right to provide such care labor with dignity, by exerting control over how, and sometimes whether, care is performed, including in rights-granting venues, like redistributive benefits, and rights-depriving venues, like the supervision of families by child protective services. Fourth, burdens regulate gendered identities, reinforcing heteronormative and cis-normative constructions of gender, including by directly controlling gender identification. While gendered burdens are not only experienced by women, they are most strongly applied to poor and racially marginalized groups of women. These claims provide a basis for public administration scholarship to connect with feminist theory by illustrating the centrality of administrative processes and related experiences to structural patterns of inequality.","PeriodicalId":48366,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muae021","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Gendered burdens are experiences of coercive and controlling state actions that directly regulate gendered bodies, labor, and identity. It’s not simply about preventing access to rights and benefits, it’s about control and coercion. Gendered burdens generate gender inequality through four mechanisms. First, administrative burdens regulate reproductive bodies, legitimating the state’s direct control over reproductive health care, including abortions, with consequent implications for peoples’ health. Second, burdens require reproductive labor, shifting unpaid and underpaid reproductive labor onto women as the policies that support such labor tend to have high administrative burden that impede access. Third, gendered burdens restrict reproductive labor, impeding the right to provide such care labor with dignity, by exerting control over how, and sometimes whether, care is performed, including in rights-granting venues, like redistributive benefits, and rights-depriving venues, like the supervision of families by child protective services. Fourth, burdens regulate gendered identities, reinforcing heteronormative and cis-normative constructions of gender, including by directly controlling gender identification. While gendered burdens are not only experienced by women, they are most strongly applied to poor and racially marginalized groups of women. These claims provide a basis for public administration scholarship to connect with feminist theory by illustrating the centrality of administrative processes and related experiences to structural patterns of inequality.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
性别化的行政负担:规范性别身体、劳动和身份
性别化负担是国家强制和控制行为的体验,这些行为直接规范了性别化的身体、劳动和身份。它不仅仅是阻止获得权利和福利,而是控制和胁迫。性别负担通过四种机制产生性别不平等。首先,行政负担对生殖身体进行管理,使国家对包括堕胎在内的生殖保健的直接控制合法化,从而对人们的健康产生影响。第二,负担要求生殖劳动,将无报酬和报酬不足的生殖劳动转嫁到妇女身上,因为支持这种劳动的政策往往具有很高的行政负担,阻碍了妇女获得生殖服务。第三,性别负担限制了生育劳动,通过控制如何(有时是是否)提供护理,包括在再分配福利等赋予权利的场所和儿童保护服务机构对家庭的监督等剥夺权利的场所,阻碍了有尊严地提供此类护理劳动的权利。第四,负担规范了性别身份,强化了异性恋和顺性别规范的性别建构,包括直接控制性别认同。虽然性别负担并非只有妇女才会经历,但对贫困妇女和种族边缘化妇女群体的影响最大。这些主张为公共行政学术研究提供了与女权主义理论相联系的基础,说明了行政程序和相关经验对结构性不平等模式的核心作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
11.90%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: The Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory serves as a bridge between public administration or public management scholarship and public policy studies. The Journal aims to provide in-depth analysis of developments in the organizational, administrative, and policy sciences as they apply to government and governance. Each issue brings you critical perspectives and cogent analyses, serving as an outlet for the best theoretical and research work in the field. The Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory is the official journal of the Public Management Research Association.
期刊最新文献
The professional profile, competence, and responsiveness of senior bureaucrats: a paired survey experiment with citizens and elite respondents A reputational perspective on structural reforms: How media reputations are related to the structural reform likelihood of public agencies Making Administrative Work Matter in Public Service Delivery: A Lens for Linking Practice with the Purpose of Office Gendered Administrative Burden: Regulating Gendered Bodies, Labor, and Identity Procedural Politicking for What? Bureaucratic Reputation and Democratic Governance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1