Head-to-Head Comparison of [68Ga]Ga-NOTA-RM26 and [18F]FDG PET/CT in Patients with Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: A Prospective Study

Rongxi Wang, Weiming Kang, Zhen Liu, Yumin Zheng, Huimin Sui, Linlin Li, Jiarou Wang, Jialin Xiang, Xingtong Peng, Xiaoyuan Chen, Zhaohui Zhu, Jingjing Zhang
{"title":"Head-to-Head Comparison of [68Ga]Ga-NOTA-RM26 and [18F]FDG PET/CT in Patients with Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: A Prospective Study","authors":"Rongxi Wang, Weiming Kang, Zhen Liu, Yumin Zheng, Huimin Sui, Linlin Li, Jiarou Wang, Jialin Xiang, Xingtong Peng, Xiaoyuan Chen, Zhaohui Zhu, Jingjing Zhang","doi":"10.2967/jnumed.124.267810","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common stromal tumors in the gastrointestinal tract. This study was designed to evaluate a gastrin-releasing peptide receptor antagonist PET tracer, [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-NOTA-RM26, and compare it with [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT in the assessment of patients with GISTs. <strong>Methods:</strong> With institutional review board approval and informed consent, 30 patients with suspected or proven GISTs based on abdominal CT or gastroscopy were recruited. All patients underwent [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-NOTA-RM26 and [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT scans. Pathology and other patient information were collected. <strong>Results:</strong> No radiopharmaceutical-related adverse events were observed in the patients. In total, 18 lesions in 16 patients were diagnosed as GIST, 3 patients were diagnosed with schwannoma, and 4 patients were diagnosed with leiomyoma. In 18 GISTs, the mean SUV<sub>max</sub> of [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-NOTA-RM26 PET was significantly higher than that of [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET (17.07 ± 19.57 vs. 2.28 ± 1.65; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.01), and [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-NOTA-RM26 PET/CT had a higher tumor detection rate than did [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT (88.9% vs. 50%; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.01). The uptake of [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-NOTA-RM26 in GISTs was significantly higher than that in 2 other benign tumors (leiomyoma or schwannoma) (17.07 ± 19.57 vs. 4.23 ± 1.77; <em>P</em> = 0.014). With the SUV<sub>max</sub> cutoff value of 6.0, the sensitivity of <sup>68</sup>Ga-NOTA-RM26 PET/CT in diagnosing GISTs is 72% and the specificity is 85.7%. <strong>Conclusion:</strong> Compared with [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT, [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-NOTA-RM26 PET/CT is a promising and effective imaging modality for the detection of GISTs.</p>","PeriodicalId":22820,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Nuclear Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Nuclear Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.124.267810","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common stromal tumors in the gastrointestinal tract. This study was designed to evaluate a gastrin-releasing peptide receptor antagonist PET tracer, [68Ga]Ga-NOTA-RM26, and compare it with [18F]FDG PET/CT in the assessment of patients with GISTs. Methods: With institutional review board approval and informed consent, 30 patients with suspected or proven GISTs based on abdominal CT or gastroscopy were recruited. All patients underwent [68Ga]Ga-NOTA-RM26 and [18F]FDG PET/CT scans. Pathology and other patient information were collected. Results: No radiopharmaceutical-related adverse events were observed in the patients. In total, 18 lesions in 16 patients were diagnosed as GIST, 3 patients were diagnosed with schwannoma, and 4 patients were diagnosed with leiomyoma. In 18 GISTs, the mean SUVmax of [68Ga]Ga-NOTA-RM26 PET was significantly higher than that of [18F]FDG PET (17.07 ± 19.57 vs. 2.28 ± 1.65; P < 0.01), and [68Ga]Ga-NOTA-RM26 PET/CT had a higher tumor detection rate than did [18F]FDG PET/CT (88.9% vs. 50%; P < 0.01). The uptake of [68Ga]Ga-NOTA-RM26 in GISTs was significantly higher than that in 2 other benign tumors (leiomyoma or schwannoma) (17.07 ± 19.57 vs. 4.23 ± 1.77; P = 0.014). With the SUVmax cutoff value of 6.0, the sensitivity of 68Ga-NOTA-RM26 PET/CT in diagnosing GISTs is 72% and the specificity is 85.7%. Conclusion: Compared with [18F]FDG PET/CT, [68Ga]Ga-NOTA-RM26 PET/CT is a promising and effective imaging modality for the detection of GISTs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胃肠道间质瘤患者的[68Ga]Ga-NOTA-RM26和[18F]FDG PET/CT头对头比较:前瞻性研究
胃肠道间质瘤(GIST)是胃肠道最常见的间质瘤。本研究旨在评估胃泌素释放肽受体拮抗剂PET示踪剂[68Ga]Ga-NOTA-RM26,并将其与[18F]FDG PET/CT在胃肠道间质瘤患者的评估中进行比较。研究方法征得机构审查委员会批准和知情同意后,招募了30名根据腹部CT或胃镜检查疑似或确诊为GIST的患者。所有患者均接受了[68Ga]Ga-NOTA-RM26和[18F]FDG PET/CT扫描。收集了病理和其他患者信息。结果:患者未出现放射性药物相关不良反应。共有 16 名患者的 18 个病灶被诊断为 GIST,3 名患者被诊断为分裂瘤,4 名患者被诊断为子宫肌瘤。在18例GIST中,[68Ga]Ga-NOTA-RM26 PET的平均SUVmax明显高于[18F]FDG PET(17.07 ± 19.57 vs. 2.28 ± 1.65;P <;0.01),[68Ga]Ga-NOTA-RM26 PET/CT的肿瘤检出率高于[18F]FDG PET/CT(88.9% vs. 50%;P <;0.01)。GIST对[68Ga]Ga-NOTA-RM26的摄取量明显高于其他两种良性肿瘤(肌瘤或分裂瘤)(17.07 ± 19.57 vs. 4.23 ± 1.77;P = 0.014)。当 SUVmax 临界值为 6.0 时,68Ga-NOTA-RM26 PET/CT 诊断 GIST 的敏感性为 72%,特异性为 85.7%。结论与[18F]FDG PET/CT相比,[68Ga]Ga-NOTA-RM26 PET/CT是一种检测GISTs的有效成像方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Precautions to Consider in the Analysis of Prognostic and Predictive Indices Head-to-Head Comparison of [68Ga]Ga-NOTA-RM26 and [18F]FDG PET/CT in Patients with Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: A Prospective Study [18F]F-AraG Uptake in Vertebral Bone Marrow May Predict Survival in Patients with Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Anti-PD-(L)1 Immunotherapy Intraarterial Administration of Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy in Patients with Advanced Meningioma: Initial Safety and Efficacy MIRD Pamphlet No. 31: MIRDcell V4—Artificial Intelligence Tools to Formulate Optimized Radiopharmaceutical Cocktails for Therapy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1