Understanding the differences between prognostic and predictive indices is imperative for medical research advances. We have developed a new prognostic measure that will identify the strengths, limitations, and potential applications in clinical practice.
{"title":"Precautions to Consider in the Analysis of Prognostic and Predictive Indices","authors":"Loïc Chartier, Aurélien Belot, Isabelle Chaillol, Mad-Hélénie Elsensohn, Cédric Portugues, Marguerite Fournier, Clémentine Joubert, Elodie Gat, Cécile Pizot, Patrick Fogarty, Tesla Murairi, Romain Ould Ammar, Jérôme Paget, Fanny Cherblanc, Romain Ricci, Laetitia Vercellino, Salim Kanoun, Anne-Ségolène Cottereau, Catherine Thieblemont, Olivier Casasnovas","doi":"10.2967/jnumed.123.267021","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.123.267021","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Understanding the differences between prognostic and predictive indices is imperative for medical research advances. We have developed a new prognostic measure that will identify the strengths, limitations, and potential applications in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":22820,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Nuclear Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142562087","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-24DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.124.268217
Adriana Amerein, Christoph Maurer, Malte Kircher, Alexander Gäble, Anne Krebold, Andreas Rinscheid, Oliver Viering, Christian H. Pfob, Ralph A. Bundschuh, Lars Behrens, Arthur JAT Braat, Ansgar Berlis, Constantin Lapa
Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is a treatment option for patients with advanced meningioma. Recently, intraarterial application of the radiolabeled somatostatin receptor agonists has been introduced as an alternative to standard intravenous administration. In this study, we assessed the safety and efficacy of intraarterial PRRT in patients with advanced, progressive meningioma. Methods: Patients with advanced, progressive meningioma underwent intraarterial PRRT with [177Lu]Lu-HA-DOTATATE. The safety of PRRT was evaluated according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. Treatment response was assessed according to the proposed Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology criteria for meningiomas and somatostatin receptor–directed PET/CT. Results: Thirteen patients (8 women, 5 men; mean age, 65 ± 13 y) with advanced meningioma underwent 1–4 cycles (median, 4 cycles) of intraarterial PRRT with [177Lu]Lu-HA-DOTATATE (mean activity per cycle, 7,428 ± 237 MBq; range, 6,000–7,700 MBq). Treatment was well tolerated with mainly grade 1–2 hematologic toxicity. Ten of 13 patients showed radiologic disease control at follow-up after therapy (1/10 complete remission, 1/10 partial remission, 8/10 stable disease), and 9 of 13 patients showed good control of clinical symptoms. Conclusion: Intraarterial PRRT in patients with advanced meningioma is feasible and safe. It may result in improved radiologic and clinical disease control compared with intravenous PRRT. Further research to validate these initial findings and to investigate long-term outcomes is highly warranted.
{"title":"Intraarterial Administration of Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy in Patients with Advanced Meningioma: Initial Safety and Efficacy","authors":"Adriana Amerein, Christoph Maurer, Malte Kircher, Alexander Gäble, Anne Krebold, Andreas Rinscheid, Oliver Viering, Christian H. Pfob, Ralph A. Bundschuh, Lars Behrens, Arthur JAT Braat, Ansgar Berlis, Constantin Lapa","doi":"10.2967/jnumed.124.268217","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.124.268217","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is a treatment option for patients with advanced meningioma. Recently, intraarterial application of the radiolabeled somatostatin receptor agonists has been introduced as an alternative to standard intravenous administration. In this study, we assessed the safety and efficacy of intraarterial PRRT in patients with advanced, progressive meningioma. <strong>Methods:</strong> Patients with advanced, progressive meningioma underwent intraarterial PRRT with [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-HA-DOTATATE. The safety of PRRT was evaluated according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. Treatment response was assessed according to the proposed Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology criteria for meningiomas and somatostatin receptor–directed PET/CT. <strong>Results:</strong> Thirteen patients (8 women, 5 men; mean age, 65 ± 13 y) with advanced meningioma underwent 1–4 cycles (median, 4 cycles) of intraarterial PRRT with [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-HA-DOTATATE (mean activity per cycle, 7,428 ± 237 MBq; range, 6,000–7,700 MBq). Treatment was well tolerated with mainly grade 1–2 hematologic toxicity. Ten of 13 patients showed radiologic disease control at follow-up after therapy (1/10 complete remission, 1/10 partial remission, 8/10 stable disease), and 9 of 13 patients showed good control of clinical symptoms. <strong>Conclusion:</strong> Intraarterial PRRT in patients with advanced meningioma is feasible and safe. It may result in improved radiologic and clinical disease control compared with intravenous PRRT. Further research to validate these initial findings and to investigate long-term outcomes is highly warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":22820,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Nuclear Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142489362","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-24DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.123.267238
Sumudu Katugampola, Jianchao Wang, Roger W. Howell
Radiopharmaceutical cocktails have been developed over the years to treat cancer. Cocktails of agents are attractive because 1 radiopharmaceutical is unlikely to have the desired therapeutic effect because of nonuniform uptake by the targeted cells. Therefore, multiple radiopharmaceuticals targeting different receptors on a cell is warranted. However, past implementations in vivo have not met with convincing results because of the absence of optimization strategies. Here we present artificial intelligence (AI) tools housed in a new version of our software platform, MIRDcell V4, that optimize a cocktail of radiopharmaceuticals by minimizing the total disintegrations needed to achieve a given surviving fraction (SF) of tumor cells. Methods: AI tools are developed within MIRDcell V4 using an optimizer based on the sequential least-squares programming algorithm. The algorithm determines the molar activities for each drug in the cocktail that minimize the total disintegrations required to achieve a specified SF. Tools are provided for populations of cells that do not cross-irradiate (e.g., circulating or disseminated tumor cells) and for multicellular clusters (e.g., micrometastases). The tools were tested using model data, flow cytometry data for suspensions of single cells labeled with fluorochrome-labeled antibodies, and 3-dimensional spatiotemporal kinetics in spheroids for fluorochrome-loaded liposomes. Results: Experimental binding distributions of 4 211At-antibodies were considered for treating suspensions of MDA-MB-231 human breast cancer cells. A 2-drug combination reduced the number of 211At decays required by a factor of 1.6 relative to the best single antibody. In another study, 2 radiopharmaceuticals radiolabeled with 195mPt were each distributed lognormally in a hypothetical multicellular cluster. Here, the 2-drug combination required 1.7-fold fewer decays than did either drug alone. Finally, 2 225Ac-labeled drugs that provide different radial distributions within a spheroid require about one half of the disintegrations required by the best single agent. Conclusion: The MIRDcell AI tools determine optimized drug combinations and corresponding molar activities needed to achieve a given SF. This approach could be used to analyze a sample of cells obtained from cell culture, animal, or patient to predict the best combination of drugs for maximum therapeutic effect with the least total disintegrations.
{"title":"MIRD Pamphlet No. 31: MIRDcell V4—Artificial Intelligence Tools to Formulate Optimized Radiopharmaceutical Cocktails for Therapy","authors":"Sumudu Katugampola, Jianchao Wang, Roger W. Howell","doi":"10.2967/jnumed.123.267238","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.123.267238","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Radiopharmaceutical cocktails have been developed over the years to treat cancer. Cocktails of agents are attractive because 1 radiopharmaceutical is unlikely to have the desired therapeutic effect because of nonuniform uptake by the targeted cells. Therefore, multiple radiopharmaceuticals targeting different receptors on a cell is warranted. However, past implementations in vivo have not met with convincing results because of the absence of optimization strategies. Here we present artificial intelligence (AI) tools housed in a new version of our software platform, MIRDcell V4, that optimize a cocktail of radiopharmaceuticals by minimizing the total disintegrations needed to achieve a given surviving fraction (SF) of tumor cells. <strong>Methods:</strong> AI tools are developed within MIRDcell V4 using an optimizer based on the sequential least-squares programming algorithm. The algorithm determines the molar activities for each drug in the cocktail that minimize the total disintegrations required to achieve a specified SF. Tools are provided for populations of cells that do not cross-irradiate (e.g., circulating or disseminated tumor cells) and for multicellular clusters (e.g., micrometastases). The tools were tested using model data, flow cytometry data for suspensions of single cells labeled with fluorochrome-labeled antibodies, and 3-dimensional spatiotemporal kinetics in spheroids for fluorochrome-loaded liposomes. <strong>Results:</strong> Experimental binding distributions of 4 <sup>211</sup>At-antibodies were considered for treating suspensions of MDA-MB-231 human breast cancer cells. A 2-drug combination reduced the number of <sup>211</sup>At decays required by a factor of 1.6 relative to the best single antibody. In another study, 2 radiopharmaceuticals radiolabeled with <sup>195m</sup>Pt were each distributed lognormally in a hypothetical multicellular cluster. Here, the 2-drug combination required 1.7-fold fewer decays than did either drug alone. Finally, 2 <sup>225</sup>Ac-labeled drugs that provide different radial distributions within a spheroid require about one half of the disintegrations required by the best single agent. <strong>Conclusion:</strong> The MIRDcell AI tools determine optimized drug combinations and corresponding molar activities needed to achieve a given SF. This approach could be used to analyze a sample of cells obtained from cell culture, animal, or patient to predict the best combination of drugs for maximum therapeutic effect with the least total disintegrations.</p>","PeriodicalId":22820,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Nuclear Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142489816","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-24DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.124.267494
Evan D. Morris, Gaelle M. Emvalomenos, Jocelyn Hoye, Steven R. Meikle
Researchers use dynamic PET imaging with target-selective tracer molecules to probe molecular processes. Kinetic models have been developed to describe these processes. The models are typically fitted to the measured PET data with the assumption that the brain is in a steady-state condition for the duration of the scan. The end results are quantitative parameters that characterize the molecular processes. The most common kinetic modeling endpoints are estimates of volume of distribution or the binding potential of a tracer. If the steady state is violated during the scanning period, the standard kinetic models may not apply. To address this issue, time-variant kinetic models have been developed for the characterization of dynamic PET data acquired while significant changes (e.g., short-lived neurotransmitter changes) are occurring in brain processes. These models are intended to extract a transient signal from data. This work in the PET field dates back at least to the 1990s. As interest has grown in imaging nonsteady events, development and refinement of time-variant models has accelerated. These new models, which we classify as belonging to the first, second, or third generation according to their innovation, have used the latest progress in mathematics, image processing, artificial intelligence, and statistics to improve the sensitivity and performance of the earliest practical time-variant models to detect and describe nonsteady phenomena. This review provides a detailed overview of the history of time-variant models in PET. It puts key advancements in the field into historical and scientific context. The sum total of the methods is an ongoing attempt to better understand the nature and implications of neurotransmitter fluctuations and other brief neurochemical phenomena.
研究人员利用目标选择性示踪分子的动态 PET 成像来探测分子过程。已开发出动力学模型来描述这些过程。这些模型通常与测量到的 PET 数据进行拟合,假设大脑在扫描期间处于稳态状态。最终结果是描述分子过程的定量参数。最常见的动力学建模终点是示踪剂分布容积或结合电位的估计值。如果在扫描期间破坏了稳态,标准动力学模型可能就不适用了。为了解决这个问题,我们开发了时变动力学模型,用于描述在大脑过程发生重大变化(如短时神经递质变化)时获取的动态 PET 数据。这些模型旨在从数据中提取瞬时信号。PET 领域的这项工作至少可以追溯到 20 世纪 90 年代。随着人们对非稳态事件成像的兴趣日益浓厚,时变模型的开发和完善也在加速。我们根据创新程度将这些新模型分为第一代、第二代或第三代,它们利用数学、图像处理、人工智能和统计学的最新进展,提高了最早的实用时变模型的灵敏度和性能,以检测和描述非稳态现象。本综述详细概述了 PET 时变模型的历史。它将该领域的主要进展置于历史和科学背景之中。这些方法的总和是为了更好地理解神经递质波动和其他短暂神经化学现象的性质和影响而不断进行的尝试。
{"title":"Modeling PET Data Acquired During Nonsteady Conditions: What If Brain Conditions Change During the Scan?","authors":"Evan D. Morris, Gaelle M. Emvalomenos, Jocelyn Hoye, Steven R. Meikle","doi":"10.2967/jnumed.124.267494","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.124.267494","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Researchers use dynamic PET imaging with target-selective tracer molecules to probe molecular processes. Kinetic models have been developed to describe these processes. The models are typically fitted to the measured PET data with the assumption that the brain is in a steady-state condition for the duration of the scan. The end results are quantitative parameters that characterize the molecular processes. The most common kinetic modeling endpoints are estimates of volume of distribution or the binding potential of a tracer. If the steady state is violated during the scanning period, the standard kinetic models may not apply. To address this issue, time-variant kinetic models have been developed for the characterization of dynamic PET data acquired while significant changes (e.g., short-lived neurotransmitter changes) are occurring in brain processes. These models are intended to extract a transient signal from data. This work in the PET field dates back at least to the 1990s. As interest has grown in imaging nonsteady events, development and refinement of time-variant models has accelerated. These new models, which we classify as belonging to the first, second, or third generation according to their innovation, have used the latest progress in mathematics, image processing, artificial intelligence, and statistics to improve the sensitivity and performance of the earliest practical time-variant models to detect and describe nonsteady phenomena. This review provides a detailed overview of the history of time-variant models in PET. It puts key advancements in the field into historical and scientific context. The sum total of the methods is an ongoing attempt to better understand the nature and implications of neurotransmitter fluctuations and other brief neurochemical phenomena.</p>","PeriodicalId":22820,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Nuclear Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142489817","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-24DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.124.268253
Jelena Levi, Millie Das, Minal S. Vasanawala, Deepti Behl, Martin Pomper, Patrick M. Forde, Erica Nakajima, James Sayre, Bin Shen, Hilda Cabrera, Niko Del Mar, Michele Gullen, Michele Pierini, Laura Cox, Ojaswita Lokre, Timothy Perk, Hee-Don Chae
Despite the systemic impact of both cancer and the associated immune response, immuno-PET is predominantly centered on assessment of the immune milieu within the tumor microenvironment. The aim of this study was to assess the value of [18F]F-AraG PET imaging as a noninvasive method for evaluation of system-wide immune status of patients with non–small cell lung cancer before starting immunotherapy. Methods: Eleven patients with advanced non–small cell lung cancer were imaged with [18F]F-AraG before starting immunotherapy. Diagnostic [18F]FDG PET/CT scans were analyzed to assess differences in the extent of disease among patients. SUVmax, SUVmean, and total SUV (SUVtotal) from all tumor lesions, active lymph nodes, spleen, vertebral bone marrow, liver, thyroid, heart, and bowel were extracted from the baseline [18F]F-AraG scans, and discriminant and Kaplan–Meier analyses were performed to test their ability to predict patient response and overall survival. Results: The extent of the disease was variable in the patient cohort, but none of the [18F]FDG biomarkers associated with tumor burden (SUVmax, total metabolic tumor volume, and total lesion glycolysis) was predictive of patient survival. The differences in the [18F]F-AraG and [18F]FDG distribution were observed both within and between lesions, confirming that they capture distinct aspects of the tumor microenvironment. Of the 3 SUV parameters studied, [18F]F-AraG SUVtotal provided a dynamic range suitable for stratifying tumors or patients according to their immune activity. [18F]F-AraG SUVtotal measured in the lumbar and sacral vertebrae differentiated between patients who progressed on therapy and those who did not with 90.9% and 81.8% accuracy, respectively. The Kaplan–Meier analysis revealed that patients with high [18F]F-AraG SUVtotal in the lumbar bone marrow had significantly lower probability of survival than those with a low signal (P = 0.0003). Conclusion: This study highlights the significance of assessing systemic immunity and indicates the potential of the [18F]F-AraG bone marrow signal as a predictive imaging biomarker for patient stratification and treatment guidance.
尽管癌症和相关免疫反应都会对全身产生影响,但免疫 PET 主要侧重于评估肿瘤微环境中的免疫环境。本研究旨在评估[18F]F-AraG PET 成像作为一种非侵入性方法的价值,用于评估非小细胞肺癌患者在开始免疫治疗前的全系统免疫状态。研究方法11名晚期非小细胞肺癌患者在开始免疫治疗前接受了[18F]F-AraG成像。对诊断性[18F]FDG PET/CT扫描进行分析,以评估不同患者疾病范围的差异。从基线[18F]F-AraG扫描中提取所有肿瘤病灶、活动淋巴结、脾脏、脊椎骨骨髓、肝脏、甲状腺、心脏和肠道的SUVmax、SUVmean和总SUV(SUVtotal),并进行判别分析和Kaplan-Meier分析,以检验它们预测患者反应和总生存期的能力。结果患者队列中的疾病程度各不相同,但与肿瘤负荷相关的[18F]FDG生物标记物(SUVmax、肿瘤总代谢体积和病变总糖酵解量)都不能预测患者的生存期。[18F]F-AraG和[18F]FDG分布在病灶内部和病灶之间都存在差异,这证实它们捕捉到了肿瘤微环境的不同方面。在所研究的 3 个 SUV 参数中,[18F]F-AraG SUV 总值的动态范围适合根据肿瘤或患者的免疫活性对其进行分层。在腰椎和骶椎测量的[18F]F-AraG SUVtotal区分治疗进展和未进展患者的准确率分别为90.9%和81.8%。Kaplan-Meier 分析显示,腰椎骨髓中[18F]F-AraG SUVtotal 信号高的患者生存概率明显低于信号低的患者(P = 0.0003)。结论这项研究强调了评估全身免疫的重要性,并表明[18F]F-AraG骨髓信号作为预测性成像生物标志物在患者分层和治疗指导方面的潜力。
{"title":"[18F]F-AraG Uptake in Vertebral Bone Marrow May Predict Survival in Patients with Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Anti-PD-(L)1 Immunotherapy","authors":"Jelena Levi, Millie Das, Minal S. Vasanawala, Deepti Behl, Martin Pomper, Patrick M. Forde, Erica Nakajima, James Sayre, Bin Shen, Hilda Cabrera, Niko Del Mar, Michele Gullen, Michele Pierini, Laura Cox, Ojaswita Lokre, Timothy Perk, Hee-Don Chae","doi":"10.2967/jnumed.124.268253","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.124.268253","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Despite the systemic impact of both cancer and the associated immune response, immuno-PET is predominantly centered on assessment of the immune milieu within the tumor microenvironment. The aim of this study was to assess the value of [<sup>18</sup>F]F-AraG PET imaging as a noninvasive method for evaluation of system-wide immune status of patients with non–small cell lung cancer before starting immunotherapy. <strong>Methods:</strong> Eleven patients with advanced non–small cell lung cancer were imaged with [<sup>18</sup>F]F-AraG before starting immunotherapy. Diagnostic [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT scans were analyzed to assess differences in the extent of disease among patients. SUV<sub>max</sub>, SUV<sub>mean</sub>, and total SUV (SUV<sub>total</sub>) from all tumor lesions, active lymph nodes, spleen, vertebral bone marrow, liver, thyroid, heart, and bowel were extracted from the baseline [<sup>18</sup>F]F-AraG scans, and discriminant and Kaplan–Meier analyses were performed to test their ability to predict patient response and overall survival. <strong>Results:</strong> The extent of the disease was variable in the patient cohort, but none of the [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG biomarkers associated with tumor burden (SUV<sub>max</sub>, total metabolic tumor volume, and total lesion glycolysis) was predictive of patient survival. The differences in the [<sup>18</sup>F]F-AraG and [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG distribution were observed both within and between lesions, confirming that they capture distinct aspects of the tumor microenvironment. Of the 3 SUV parameters studied, [<sup>18</sup>F]F-AraG SUV<sub>total</sub> provided a dynamic range suitable for stratifying tumors or patients according to their immune activity. [<sup>18</sup>F]F-AraG SUV<sub>total</sub> measured in the lumbar and sacral vertebrae differentiated between patients who progressed on therapy and those who did not with 90.9% and 81.8% accuracy, respectively. The Kaplan–Meier analysis revealed that patients with high [<sup>18</sup>F]F-AraG SUV<sub>total</sub> in the lumbar bone marrow had significantly lower probability of survival than those with a low signal (<em>P</em> = 0.0003). <strong>Conclusion:</strong> This study highlights the significance of assessing systemic immunity and indicates the potential of the [<sup>18</sup>F]F-AraG bone marrow signal as a predictive imaging biomarker for patient stratification and treatment guidance.</p>","PeriodicalId":22820,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Nuclear Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142489361","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common stromal tumors in the gastrointestinal tract. This study was designed to evaluate a gastrin-releasing peptide receptor antagonist PET tracer, [68Ga]Ga-NOTA-RM26, and compare it with [18F]FDG PET/CT in the assessment of patients with GISTs. Methods: With institutional review board approval and informed consent, 30 patients with suspected or proven GISTs based on abdominal CT or gastroscopy were recruited. All patients underwent [68Ga]Ga-NOTA-RM26 and [18F]FDG PET/CT scans. Pathology and other patient information were collected. Results: No radiopharmaceutical-related adverse events were observed in the patients. In total, 18 lesions in 16 patients were diagnosed as GIST, 3 patients were diagnosed with schwannoma, and 4 patients were diagnosed with leiomyoma. In 18 GISTs, the mean SUVmax of [68Ga]Ga-NOTA-RM26 PET was significantly higher than that of [18F]FDG PET (17.07 ± 19.57 vs. 2.28 ± 1.65; P < 0.01), and [68Ga]Ga-NOTA-RM26 PET/CT had a higher tumor detection rate than did [18F]FDG PET/CT (88.9% vs. 50%; P < 0.01). The uptake of [68Ga]Ga-NOTA-RM26 in GISTs was significantly higher than that in 2 other benign tumors (leiomyoma or schwannoma) (17.07 ± 19.57 vs. 4.23 ± 1.77; P = 0.014). With the SUVmax cutoff value of 6.0, the sensitivity of 68Ga-NOTA-RM26 PET/CT in diagnosing GISTs is 72% and the specificity is 85.7%. Conclusion: Compared with [18F]FDG PET/CT, [68Ga]Ga-NOTA-RM26 PET/CT is a promising and effective imaging modality for the detection of GISTs.
{"title":"Head-to-Head Comparison of [68Ga]Ga-NOTA-RM26 and [18F]FDG PET/CT in Patients with Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: A Prospective Study","authors":"Rongxi Wang, Weiming Kang, Zhen Liu, Yumin Zheng, Huimin Sui, Linlin Li, Jiarou Wang, Jialin Xiang, Xingtong Peng, Xiaoyuan Chen, Zhaohui Zhu, Jingjing Zhang","doi":"10.2967/jnumed.124.267810","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.124.267810","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common stromal tumors in the gastrointestinal tract. This study was designed to evaluate a gastrin-releasing peptide receptor antagonist PET tracer, [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-NOTA-RM26, and compare it with [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT in the assessment of patients with GISTs. <strong>Methods:</strong> With institutional review board approval and informed consent, 30 patients with suspected or proven GISTs based on abdominal CT or gastroscopy were recruited. All patients underwent [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-NOTA-RM26 and [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT scans. Pathology and other patient information were collected. <strong>Results:</strong> No radiopharmaceutical-related adverse events were observed in the patients. In total, 18 lesions in 16 patients were diagnosed as GIST, 3 patients were diagnosed with schwannoma, and 4 patients were diagnosed with leiomyoma. In 18 GISTs, the mean SUV<sub>max</sub> of [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-NOTA-RM26 PET was significantly higher than that of [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET (17.07 ± 19.57 vs. 2.28 ± 1.65; <em>P</em> < 0.01), and [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-NOTA-RM26 PET/CT had a higher tumor detection rate than did [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT (88.9% vs. 50%; <em>P</em> < 0.01). The uptake of [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-NOTA-RM26 in GISTs was significantly higher than that in 2 other benign tumors (leiomyoma or schwannoma) (17.07 ± 19.57 vs. 4.23 ± 1.77; <em>P</em> = 0.014). With the SUV<sub>max</sub> cutoff value of 6.0, the sensitivity of <sup>68</sup>Ga-NOTA-RM26 PET/CT in diagnosing GISTs is 72% and the specificity is 85.7%. <strong>Conclusion:</strong> Compared with [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT, [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-NOTA-RM26 PET/CT is a promising and effective imaging modality for the detection of GISTs.</p>","PeriodicalId":22820,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Nuclear Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142489360","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-17DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.124.268754
Javier Arbizu, Silvia Morbelli, Satoshi Minoshima, Henryk Barthel, Philip Kuo, Donatienne Van Weehaeghe, Neil Horner, Patrick M. Colletti, Eric Guedj
<sec><st>PREAMBLE</st><p>The Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (SNMMI) is an international scientific and professional organization founded in 1954 to promote the science, technology, and practical application of nuclear medicine. The European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM) is a professional nonprofit medical association that facilitates communication worldwide between individuals pursuing clinical and research excellence in nuclear medicine. The EANM was founded in 1985. The EANM was founded in 1985. SNMMI and EANM members are physicians, technologists, and scientists specializing in the research and practice of nuclear medicine.</p><p>The SNMMI and EANM will periodically define new guidelines for nuclear medicine practice to help advance the science of nuclear medicine and to improve the quality of service to patients throughout the world. Existing practice guidelines will be reviewed for revision or renewal, as appropriate, on their fifth anniversary or sooner, if indicated.</p><p>Each practice guideline, representing a policy statement by the SNMMI/EANM, has undergone a thorough consensus process in which it has been subjected to extensive review. The SNMMI and EANM recognize that the safe and effective use of diagnostic nuclear medicine imaging requires specific training, skills, and techniques, as described in each document. Reproduction or modification of the published practice guideline by those entities not providing these services is not authorized.</p><p>These guidelines are an educational tool designed to assist practitioners in providing appropriate care for patients. They are not inflexible rules or requirements of practice and are not intended, nor should they be used, to establish a legal standard of care. For these reasons and those set forth below, both the SNMMI and the EANM caution against the use of these guidelines in litigation in which the clinical decisions of a practitioner are called into question.</p><p>The ultimate judgment regarding the propriety of any specific procedure or course of action must be made by the physician or medical physicist in light of all the circumstances presented. Thus, there is no implication that an approach differing from the guidelines, standing alone, is below the standard of care. To the contrary, a conscientious practitioner may responsibly adopt a course of action different from that set forth in the guidelines when, in the reasonable judgment of the practitioner, such course of action is indicated by the condition of the patient, limitations of available resources, or advances in knowledge or technology subsequent to publication of the guidelines.</p><p>The practice of medicine includes both the art and the science of the prevention, diagnosis, alleviation, and treatment of disease. The variety and complexity of human conditions make it impossible to always reach the most appropriate diagnosis or to predict with certainty a particular response to treatment.</p><p
{"title":"SNMMI Procedure Standard/EANM Practice Guideline for Brain [18F]FDG PET Imaging, Version 2.0","authors":"Javier Arbizu, Silvia Morbelli, Satoshi Minoshima, Henryk Barthel, Philip Kuo, Donatienne Van Weehaeghe, Neil Horner, Patrick M. Colletti, Eric Guedj","doi":"10.2967/jnumed.124.268754","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.124.268754","url":null,"abstract":"<sec><st>PREAMBLE</st><p>The Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (SNMMI) is an international scientific and professional organization founded in 1954 to promote the science, technology, and practical application of nuclear medicine. The European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM) is a professional nonprofit medical association that facilitates communication worldwide between individuals pursuing clinical and research excellence in nuclear medicine. The EANM was founded in 1985. The EANM was founded in 1985. SNMMI and EANM members are physicians, technologists, and scientists specializing in the research and practice of nuclear medicine.</p><p>The SNMMI and EANM will periodically define new guidelines for nuclear medicine practice to help advance the science of nuclear medicine and to improve the quality of service to patients throughout the world. Existing practice guidelines will be reviewed for revision or renewal, as appropriate, on their fifth anniversary or sooner, if indicated.</p><p>Each practice guideline, representing a policy statement by the SNMMI/EANM, has undergone a thorough consensus process in which it has been subjected to extensive review. The SNMMI and EANM recognize that the safe and effective use of diagnostic nuclear medicine imaging requires specific training, skills, and techniques, as described in each document. Reproduction or modification of the published practice guideline by those entities not providing these services is not authorized.</p><p>These guidelines are an educational tool designed to assist practitioners in providing appropriate care for patients. They are not inflexible rules or requirements of practice and are not intended, nor should they be used, to establish a legal standard of care. For these reasons and those set forth below, both the SNMMI and the EANM caution against the use of these guidelines in litigation in which the clinical decisions of a practitioner are called into question.</p><p>The ultimate judgment regarding the propriety of any specific procedure or course of action must be made by the physician or medical physicist in light of all the circumstances presented. Thus, there is no implication that an approach differing from the guidelines, standing alone, is below the standard of care. To the contrary, a conscientious practitioner may responsibly adopt a course of action different from that set forth in the guidelines when, in the reasonable judgment of the practitioner, such course of action is indicated by the condition of the patient, limitations of available resources, or advances in knowledge or technology subsequent to publication of the guidelines.</p><p>The practice of medicine includes both the art and the science of the prevention, diagnosis, alleviation, and treatment of disease. The variety and complexity of human conditions make it impossible to always reach the most appropriate diagnosis or to predict with certainty a particular response to treatment.</p><p","PeriodicalId":22820,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Nuclear Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142448593","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.124.267784
Joyce van Sluis, Johannes H. van Snick, Andor W.J.M. Glaudemans, Riemer H.J.A. Slart, Walter Noordzij, Adrienne H. Brouwers, Rudi A.J.O. Dierckx, Adriaan A. Lammertsma, Charalampos Tsoumpas, Ronald Boellaard
Methods to shorten [18F]FDG Patlak PET imaging procedures ranging from 65–90 to 20–30 min after injection, using a population-averaged input function (PIF) scaled to patient-specific image-derived input function (IDIF) values, were recently evaluated. The aim of the present study was to explore the feasibility of ultrashort 10-min [18F]FDG Patlak imaging at 55–65 min after injection using a PIF combined with direct Patlak reconstructions to provide reliable quantitative accuracy of lung tumor uptake, compared with a full-duration 65-min acquisition using an IDIF. Methods: Patients underwent a 65-min dynamic PET acquisition on a long-axial-field-of-view (LAFOV) Biograph Vision Quadra PET/CT scanner. Subsequently, direct Patlak reconstructions and image-based (with reconstructed dynamic images) Patlak analyses were performed using both the IDIF (time to relative kinetic equilibrium between blood and tissue concentration (t*) = 30 min) and a scaled PIF at 30–60 min after injection. Next, direct Patlak reconstructions were performed on the system console using only the last 10 min of the acquisition, that is, from 55 to 65 min after injection, and a scaled PIF using maximum crystal ring difference settings of both 85 and 322. Tumor lesion and healthy-tissue uptake was quantified and compared between the differently obtained parametric images to assess quantitative accuracy. Results: Good agreement was obtained between direct- and image-based Patlak analyses using the IDIF (t* = 30 min) and scaled PIF at 30–60 min after injection, performed using the different approaches, with no more than 8.8% deviation in tumor influx rate value (Ki) (mean difference ranging from −0.0022 to 0.0018 mL/[min × g]). When direct Patlak reconstruction was performed on the system console, excellent agreement was found between the use of a scaled PIF at 30–60 min after injection versus 55–65 min after injection, with 2.4% deviation in tumor Ki (median difference, −0.0018 mL/[min × g]; range, −0.0047 to 0.0036 mL/[min × g]). For different maximum crystal ring difference settings using the scan time interval of 55–65 min after injection, only a 0.5% difference (median difference, 0.0000 mL/[min × g]; range, −0.0004 to 0.0013 mL/[min × g]) in tumor Ki was found. Conclusion: Ultrashort whole-body [18F]FDG Patlak imaging is feasible on an LAFOV Biograph Vision Quadra PET/CT system without loss of quantitative accuracy to assess lung tumor uptake compared with a full-duration 65-min acquisition. The ultrashort 10-min direct Patlak reconstruction with PIF allows for its implementation in clinical practice.
{"title":"Ultrashort Oncologic Whole-Body [18F]FDG Patlak Imaging Using LAFOV PET","authors":"Joyce van Sluis, Johannes H. van Snick, Andor W.J.M. Glaudemans, Riemer H.J.A. Slart, Walter Noordzij, Adrienne H. Brouwers, Rudi A.J.O. Dierckx, Adriaan A. Lammertsma, Charalampos Tsoumpas, Ronald Boellaard","doi":"10.2967/jnumed.124.267784","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.124.267784","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Methods to shorten [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG Patlak PET imaging procedures ranging from 65–90 to 20–30 min after injection, using a population-averaged input function (PIF) scaled to patient-specific image-derived input function (IDIF) values, were recently evaluated. The aim of the present study was to explore the feasibility of ultrashort 10-min [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG Patlak imaging at 55–65 min after injection using a PIF combined with direct Patlak reconstructions to provide reliable quantitative accuracy of lung tumor uptake, compared with a full-duration 65-min acquisition using an IDIF. <strong>Methods:</strong> Patients underwent a 65-min dynamic PET acquisition on a long-axial-field-of-view (LAFOV) Biograph Vision Quadra PET/CT scanner. Subsequently, direct Patlak reconstructions and image-based (with reconstructed dynamic images) Patlak analyses were performed using both the IDIF (time to relative kinetic equilibrium between blood and tissue concentration (t*) = 30 min) and a scaled PIF at 30–60 min after injection. Next, direct Patlak reconstructions were performed on the system console using only the last 10 min of the acquisition, that is, from 55 to 65 min after injection, and a scaled PIF using maximum crystal ring difference settings of both 85 and 322. Tumor lesion and healthy-tissue uptake was quantified and compared between the differently obtained parametric images to assess quantitative accuracy. <strong>Results:</strong> Good agreement was obtained between direct- and image-based Patlak analyses using the IDIF (t* = 30 min) and scaled PIF at 30–60 min after injection, performed using the different approaches, with no more than 8.8% deviation in tumor influx rate value (<em>K<sub>i</sub></em>) (mean difference ranging from −0.0022 to 0.0018 mL/[min × g]). When direct Patlak reconstruction was performed on the system console, excellent agreement was found between the use of a scaled PIF at 30–60 min after injection versus 55–65 min after injection, with 2.4% deviation in tumor <em>K<sub>i</sub></em> (median difference, −0.0018 mL/[min × g]; range, −0.0047 to 0.0036 mL/[min × g]). For different maximum crystal ring difference settings using the scan time interval of 55–65 min after injection, only a 0.5% difference (median difference, 0.0000 mL/[min × g]; range, −0.0004 to 0.0013 mL/[min × g]) in tumor <em>K<sub>i</sub></em> was found. <strong>Conclusion:</strong> Ultrashort whole-body [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG Patlak imaging is feasible on an LAFOV Biograph Vision Quadra PET/CT system without loss of quantitative accuracy to assess lung tumor uptake compared with a full-duration 65-min acquisition. The ultrashort 10-min direct Patlak reconstruction with PIF allows for its implementation in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":22820,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Nuclear Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142360353","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.124.267581
Xiao Zhang, Zhenyu Lin, Yuan Feng, Zhaoguo Lin, Kaixiong Tao, Tao Zhang, Xiaoli Lan
Neoadjuvant therapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) has achieved good pathologic complete response (pCR) rates, potentially eliminating the need for surgical intervention. This study investigated preoperative methods for predicting pCR after neoadjuvant short-course radiotherapy (SCRT) combined with immunochemotherapy. Methods: Treatment-naïve patients with histologically confirmed LARC were enrolled from February 2023 to July 2023. Before surgery, the patients received neoadjuvant SCRT followed by 2 cycles of capecitabine and oxaliplatin plus camrelizumab. 68Ga-labeled fibroblast activation protein inhibitor ([68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04) PET/MRI, [18F]FDG PET/CT, and contrast-enhanced MRI were performed before treatment initiation and before surgery in each patient. PET and MRI features and the size and number of lesions were also collected from each scan. Each parameter’s sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic cutoff were derived via receiver-operating-characteristic curve analysis. Results: Twenty eligible patients (13 men, 7 women; mean age, 60.2 y) were enrolled and completed the entire trial, and all patients had proficient mismatch repair or microsatellite-stable LARC. A postoperative pCR was achieved in 9 patients (45.0%). In the visual evaluation, both [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/MRI and [18F]FDG PET/CT were limited to forecasting pCR. Contrast-enhanced MRI had a low sensitivity of 55.56% to predict pCR. In the quantitative evaluation, [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 change in SULpeak percentage, where SULpeak is SUVpeak standardized by lean body mass, had the largest area under the curve (0.929) with high specificity (sensitivity, 77.78%; specificity, 100.0%; cutoff, 63.92%). Conclusion: [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/MRI is a promising imaging modality for predicting pCR after SCRT combined with immunochemotherapy. The SULpeak decrease exceeding 63.92% may provide valuable guidance in selecting patients who can forgo surgery after neoadjuvant therapy.
{"title":"Predicting Pathologic Complete Response in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer with [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET, [18F]FDG PET, and Contrast-Enhanced MRI: Lesion-to-Lesion Comparison with Pathology","authors":"Xiao Zhang, Zhenyu Lin, Yuan Feng, Zhaoguo Lin, Kaixiong Tao, Tao Zhang, Xiaoli Lan","doi":"10.2967/jnumed.124.267581","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.124.267581","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Neoadjuvant therapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) has achieved good pathologic complete response (pCR) rates, potentially eliminating the need for surgical intervention. This study investigated preoperative methods for predicting pCR after neoadjuvant short-course radiotherapy (SCRT) combined with immunochemotherapy. <strong>Methods:</strong> Treatment-naïve patients with histologically confirmed LARC were enrolled from February 2023 to July 2023. Before surgery, the patients received neoadjuvant SCRT followed by 2 cycles of capecitabine and oxaliplatin plus camrelizumab. <sup>68</sup>Ga-labeled fibroblast activation protein inhibitor ([<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-FAPI-04) PET/MRI, [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT, and contrast-enhanced MRI were performed before treatment initiation and before surgery in each patient. PET and MRI features and the size and number of lesions were also collected from each scan. Each parameter’s sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic cutoff were derived via receiver-operating-characteristic curve analysis. <strong>Results:</strong> Twenty eligible patients (13 men, 7 women; mean age, 60.2 y) were enrolled and completed the entire trial, and all patients had proficient mismatch repair or microsatellite-stable LARC. A postoperative pCR was achieved in 9 patients (45.0%). In the visual evaluation, both [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/MRI and [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT were limited to forecasting pCR. Contrast-enhanced MRI had a low sensitivity of 55.56% to predict pCR. In the quantitative evaluation, [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 change in SUL<sub>peak</sub> percentage, where SUL<sub>peak</sub> is SUV<sub>peak</sub> standardized by lean body mass, had the largest area under the curve (0.929) with high specificity (sensitivity, 77.78%; specificity, 100.0%; cutoff, 63.92%). <strong>Conclusion:</strong> [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/MRI is a promising imaging modality for predicting pCR after SCRT combined with immunochemotherapy. The SUL<sub>peak</sub> decrease exceeding 63.92% may provide valuable guidance in selecting patients who can forgo surgery after neoadjuvant therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":22820,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Nuclear Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142360354","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}