Adoption of agronomic practices and their impact on crop yield and income: An analysis for black gram and green gram in India

IF 3.4 2区 经济学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY Journal of Agricultural Economics Pub Date : 2024-10-25 DOI:10.1111/1477-9552.12617
Poornima Varma, Julius Manda
{"title":"Adoption of agronomic practices and their impact on crop yield and income: An analysis for black gram and green gram in India","authors":"Poornima Varma, Julius Manda","doi":"10.1111/1477-9552.12617","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Black gram and green gram are important pulse crops in India, but their production has faced fluctuations and stagnancy in yields over the last few decades. The Government of India has implemented several measures to enhance crop yield, including recommending and promoting the adoption of crop‐specific agronomic practices. However, there is limited empirical evidence on the determinants of the adoption of these practices and their impact on yield and income. In this context, this study analyses the determinants of the adoption of climate and plant management practices among black gram and green gram farmers and their impact on yield, crop revenue and net income across four major crop‐producing Indian states using a multinomial endogenous treatment effects model. Our analysis shows that information, contact with government extension services and access to off‐farm activities are crucial in adopting climate and plant management practices. The results strengthen the view that the adoption of knowledge‐intensive practices happens via formal information sources and plot‐level demonstrations. In addition, the results indicate that farmers who experience frequent crop loss exhibit an aversion towards adopting climate and plant management practices. While adopting these practices had a positive impact on crop yield and crop revenue, the impact on net income was observed only in the case of climate management.","PeriodicalId":14994,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Economics","volume":"44 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agricultural Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.12617","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Black gram and green gram are important pulse crops in India, but their production has faced fluctuations and stagnancy in yields over the last few decades. The Government of India has implemented several measures to enhance crop yield, including recommending and promoting the adoption of crop‐specific agronomic practices. However, there is limited empirical evidence on the determinants of the adoption of these practices and their impact on yield and income. In this context, this study analyses the determinants of the adoption of climate and plant management practices among black gram and green gram farmers and their impact on yield, crop revenue and net income across four major crop‐producing Indian states using a multinomial endogenous treatment effects model. Our analysis shows that information, contact with government extension services and access to off‐farm activities are crucial in adopting climate and plant management practices. The results strengthen the view that the adoption of knowledge‐intensive practices happens via formal information sources and plot‐level demonstrations. In addition, the results indicate that farmers who experience frequent crop loss exhibit an aversion towards adopting climate and plant management practices. While adopting these practices had a positive impact on crop yield and crop revenue, the impact on net income was observed only in the case of climate management.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
农艺措施的采用及其对作物产量和收入的影响:对印度黑糯米和绿糯米的分析
黑糯米和青糯米是印度重要的豆类作物,但在过去几十年里,它们的产量一直处于波动和停滞状态。印度政府已采取多项措施提高作物产量,包括推荐和推广采用针对特定作物的农艺措施。然而,关于采用这些做法的决定因素及其对产量和收入的影响的经验证据却很有限。在此背景下,本研究采用多项式内生处理效应模型,分析了印度四个主要作物生产邦的黑禾和绿禾农民采用气候和植物管理方法的决定因素及其对产量、作物收入和净收入的影响。我们的分析表明,信息、与政府推广服务机构的联系以及参与非农活动的机会对采用气候和植物管理方法至关重要。研究结果进一步证实,知识密集型实践的采用是通过正规信息来源和地块示范实现的。此外,结果表明,经常遭受作物损失的农民对采用气候和植物管理方法表现出反感。虽然采用这些做法对作物产量和作物收入有积极影响,但只有在气候管理情况下才会对净收入产生影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Agricultural Economics
Journal of Agricultural Economics 管理科学-农业经济与政策
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
2.90%
发文量
48
审稿时长
>24 weeks
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the Agricultural Economics Society, the Journal of Agricultural Economics is a leading international professional journal, providing a forum for research into agricultural economics and related disciplines such as statistics, marketing, business management, politics, history and sociology, and their application to issues in the agricultural, food, and related industries; rural communities, and the environment. Each issue of the JAE contains articles, notes and book reviews as well as information relating to the Agricultural Economics Society. Published 3 times a year, it is received by members and institutional subscribers in 69 countries. With contributions from leading international scholars, the JAE is a leading citation for agricultural economics and policy. Published articles either deal with new developments in research and methods of analysis, or apply existing methods and techniques to new problems and situations which are of general interest to the Journal’s international readership.
期刊最新文献
Technical and environmental inefficiency measurement in agriculture using a flexible by‐production stochastic frontier model The economic potential for area‐yield crop insurance: An application to maize in Ghana Commercialisation, exogenous shocks and nutrition: Evidence from smallholder farmers in Bangladesh Adoption of agronomic practices and their impact on crop yield and income: An analysis for black gram and green gram in India From informal farmland rental to market‐oriented transactions: Do China's Land Transfer Service Centers help?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1