Efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma deemed potentially ineligible for platinum-containing chemotherapy: Post hoc analysis of KEYNOTE-052 and LEAP-011.

IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Cancer Pub Date : 2024-10-28 DOI:10.1002/cncr.35601
Peter H O'Donnell, Yohann Loriot, Tibor Csoszi, Nobuaki Matsubara, Sang Joon Shin, Se Hoon Park, Vagif Atduev, Mahmut Gumus, Saziye Burcak Karaca, Petros Grivas, Ronald de Wit, Daniel E Castellano, Thomas Powles, Jacqueline Vuky, Yujie Zhao, Karen O'Hara, Chinyere E Okpara, Sonia Franco, Blanca Homet Moreno, Jakub Żołnierek, Arlene O Siefker-Radtke
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma deemed potentially ineligible for platinum-containing chemotherapy: Post hoc analysis of KEYNOTE-052 and LEAP-011.","authors":"Peter H O'Donnell, Yohann Loriot, Tibor Csoszi, Nobuaki Matsubara, Sang Joon Shin, Se Hoon Park, Vagif Atduev, Mahmut Gumus, Saziye Burcak Karaca, Petros Grivas, Ronald de Wit, Daniel E Castellano, Thomas Powles, Jacqueline Vuky, Yujie Zhao, Karen O'Hara, Chinyere E Okpara, Sonia Franco, Blanca Homet Moreno, Jakub Żołnierek, Arlene O Siefker-Radtke","doi":"10.1002/cncr.35601","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>First-line pembrolizumab monotherapy is a standard of care for platinum-ineligible patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC). No global standardized definition of platinum ineligibility exists. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab monotherapy in patients with UC who met various criteria for platinum ineligibility.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients from KEYNOTE-052 and LEAP-011 deemed potentially platinum ineligible were pooled for this post hoc exploratory analysis as follows: group 1: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) 2; group 2: ECOG PS 2 and age ≥80 years, renal dysfunction, or visceral disease; and group 3: any two other factors regardless of ECOG PS. Patients received pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks. End points included objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1, by blinded independent central review, overall survival (OS), and safety.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 612 patients treated with pembrolizumab from KEYNOTE-052 (n = 370) and LEAP-011 (n = 242) were included; the median (range) follow-up was 56.3 months (51.2-65.3 months) and 12.8 months (0.2-25.1 months), respectively. For group 1, ORR was 26.2%, median PFS was 2.7 months, and median OS was 10.1 months. For group 2, ORR ranged from 23.5% to 33.3%, median PFS ranged from 2.1 to 4.4 months, and median OS ranged from 9.1 to 10.1 months. For group 3, ORR ranged from 25.7% to 27.9%, median PFS ranged from 2.1 to 2.8 months, and median OS ranged from 9.0 to 10.6 months. Treatment-related adverse event rates were consistent across groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Frontline pembrolizumab has consistent antitumor activity and safety in patients with advanced UC categorized as potentially ineligible for platinum-based chemotherapy, regardless of the variable definitions of platinum ineligibility used.</p>","PeriodicalId":138,"journal":{"name":"Cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.35601","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: First-line pembrolizumab monotherapy is a standard of care for platinum-ineligible patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC). No global standardized definition of platinum ineligibility exists. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab monotherapy in patients with UC who met various criteria for platinum ineligibility.

Methods: Patients from KEYNOTE-052 and LEAP-011 deemed potentially platinum ineligible were pooled for this post hoc exploratory analysis as follows: group 1: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) 2; group 2: ECOG PS 2 and age ≥80 years, renal dysfunction, or visceral disease; and group 3: any two other factors regardless of ECOG PS. Patients received pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks. End points included objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1, by blinded independent central review, overall survival (OS), and safety.

Results: A total of 612 patients treated with pembrolizumab from KEYNOTE-052 (n = 370) and LEAP-011 (n = 242) were included; the median (range) follow-up was 56.3 months (51.2-65.3 months) and 12.8 months (0.2-25.1 months), respectively. For group 1, ORR was 26.2%, median PFS was 2.7 months, and median OS was 10.1 months. For group 2, ORR ranged from 23.5% to 33.3%, median PFS ranged from 2.1 to 4.4 months, and median OS ranged from 9.1 to 10.1 months. For group 3, ORR ranged from 25.7% to 27.9%, median PFS ranged from 2.1 to 2.8 months, and median OS ranged from 9.0 to 10.6 months. Treatment-related adverse event rates were consistent across groups.

Conclusions: Frontline pembrolizumab has consistent antitumor activity and safety in patients with advanced UC categorized as potentially ineligible for platinum-based chemotherapy, regardless of the variable definitions of platinum ineligibility used.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
pembrolizumab对被认为可能不适合接受含铂化疗的晚期尿路癌患者的疗效和安全性:对KEYNOTE-052和LEAP-011的事后分析。
背景:对于不符合铂治疗条件的晚期尿路上皮癌(UC)患者来说,一线pembrolizumab单药治疗是一种标准治疗方法。目前尚无全球统一的铂类不合格定义。本研究旨在评估符合各种铂类不合格标准的UC患者接受pembrolizumab单药治疗的疗效和安全性:将KEYNOTE-052和LEAP-011中被认为可能不符合铂类治疗条件的患者集中起来进行这项事后探索性分析,具体如下:第1组:东部合作肿瘤学组表现状态(ECOG PS)2;第2组:ECOG PS 2和年龄≥80岁、肾功能障碍或内脏疾病;第3组:任何其他两个因素,无论ECOG PS如何。患者每3周静脉注射200毫克pembrolizumab。终点包括客观反应率(ORR)、根据《实体瘤反应评估标准》1.1版通过盲法独立中央审查得出的无进展生存期(PFS)、总生存期(OS)和安全性:KEYNOTE-052(370例)和LEAP-011(242例)共纳入612例接受过pembrolizumab治疗的患者;随访中位数(范围)分别为56.3个月(51.2-65.3个月)和12.8个月(0.2-25.1个月)。第 1 组的 ORR 为 26.2%,中位 PFS 为 2.7 个月,中位 OS 为 10.1 个月。第2组的ORR为23.5%至33.3%,中位PFS为2.1至4.4个月,中位OS为9.1至10.1个月。第3组的ORR为25.7%至27.9%,中位PFS为2.1至2.8个月,中位OS为9.0至10.6个月。各组的治疗相关不良事件发生率一致:无论铂类化疗不合格的定义如何变化,前线pembrolizumab对归类为可能不符合铂类化疗条件的晚期UC患者具有一致的抗肿瘤活性和安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer
Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
3.20%
发文量
480
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The CANCER site is a full-text, electronic implementation of CANCER, an Interdisciplinary International Journal of the American Cancer Society, and CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, a Journal of the American Cancer Society. CANCER publishes interdisciplinary oncologic information according to, but not limited to, the following disease sites and disciplines: blood/bone marrow; breast disease; endocrine disorders; epidemiology; gastrointestinal tract; genitourinary disease; gynecologic oncology; head and neck disease; hepatobiliary tract; integrated medicine; lung disease; medical oncology; neuro-oncology; pathology radiation oncology; translational research
期刊最新文献
A systematic review and meta-analysis of patient-relevant outcomes in comprehensive cancer centers versus noncomprehensive cancer centers. American Society of Clinical Oncology guideline update on palliative care for patients with cancer: Addressing the reality gap. Embrace with caution: The limitations of generative artificial intelligence in responding to patient health care queries. Expression of Concern. Global disparities in cancer care: Bridging the gap in affordability and access to medications between high and low-income countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1