Life cycle assessment and yield to optimize extraction time and solvent: Comparing deep eutectic solvents vs conventional ones.

IF 8.2 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Science of the Total Environment Pub Date : 2024-12-10 Epub Date: 2024-10-20 DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.177038
Ibtissam Bouhzam, Rosa Cantero, María Margallo, Rubén Aldaco, Alba Bala, Pere Fullana-I-Palmer, Rita Puig
{"title":"Life cycle assessment and yield to optimize extraction time and solvent: Comparing deep eutectic solvents vs conventional ones.","authors":"Ibtissam Bouhzam, Rosa Cantero, María Margallo, Rubén Aldaco, Alba Bala, Pere Fullana-I-Palmer, Rita Puig","doi":"10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.177038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Deep eutectic solvents (DES) are gaining interest as eco-friendly alternatives for extracting bioactive compounds, but their environmental benefits remain unclear and need further evaluation. In this work, a case study of total polyphenols (TPC) extraction from spent coffee grounds (SCG) was environmentally evaluated using life cycle assessment (LCA). First, the most convenient extraction time (1, 10, 20, or 40 min) for water and acetone 20 % from an environmental perspective was identified. Second, a comparison of different solvents-DES (choline chloride-1,6-hexanediol), water, and ethanol 20 %-under their optimal extraction yield conditions was performed using literature data. Results from the first study revealed that the environmentally optimal extraction time (10 min) was not the one leading to the highest yield. The main contributors to the impacts were the use of acetone and electricity consumption. For the second study, DES performed worse in all studied environmental impact categories compared to both ethanol 20 % and water. Ethanol 20 % was the better option compared to water due to its higher extraction yield (9.2 mg vs. 6.5 mg TPC/g SCG, respectively). The environmental impacts associated with the DES system were primarily attributed to the DES preparation step, which requires virgin raw materials (e.g., dimethyl hexanediol), and the adsorption stage involving the use of resins. A sensitivity analysis was also conducted by optimizing the DES system to the best possible described conditions (90 % reuse of DES and maximum reduction of the macroporous resin used to adsorb the TPC after extraction). Nevertheless, the DES system still performed worse than water or ethanol 20 % systems, in 11 out of 16 impact categories. The study highlights the importance to consider environmental impacts and yield when optimizing extraction processes, especially at the laboratory scale, as the insights gained are valuable for improving eco-efficiency on an industrial scale.</p>","PeriodicalId":422,"journal":{"name":"Science of the Total Environment","volume":" ","pages":"177038"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science of the Total Environment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.177038","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Deep eutectic solvents (DES) are gaining interest as eco-friendly alternatives for extracting bioactive compounds, but their environmental benefits remain unclear and need further evaluation. In this work, a case study of total polyphenols (TPC) extraction from spent coffee grounds (SCG) was environmentally evaluated using life cycle assessment (LCA). First, the most convenient extraction time (1, 10, 20, or 40 min) for water and acetone 20 % from an environmental perspective was identified. Second, a comparison of different solvents-DES (choline chloride-1,6-hexanediol), water, and ethanol 20 %-under their optimal extraction yield conditions was performed using literature data. Results from the first study revealed that the environmentally optimal extraction time (10 min) was not the one leading to the highest yield. The main contributors to the impacts were the use of acetone and electricity consumption. For the second study, DES performed worse in all studied environmental impact categories compared to both ethanol 20 % and water. Ethanol 20 % was the better option compared to water due to its higher extraction yield (9.2 mg vs. 6.5 mg TPC/g SCG, respectively). The environmental impacts associated with the DES system were primarily attributed to the DES preparation step, which requires virgin raw materials (e.g., dimethyl hexanediol), and the adsorption stage involving the use of resins. A sensitivity analysis was also conducted by optimizing the DES system to the best possible described conditions (90 % reuse of DES and maximum reduction of the macroporous resin used to adsorb the TPC after extraction). Nevertheless, the DES system still performed worse than water or ethanol 20 % systems, in 11 out of 16 impact categories. The study highlights the importance to consider environmental impacts and yield when optimizing extraction processes, especially at the laboratory scale, as the insights gained are valuable for improving eco-efficiency on an industrial scale.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生命周期评估和产量,优化萃取时间和溶剂:深共晶溶剂与传统溶剂的比较。
深层共晶溶剂(DES)作为提取生物活性化合物的环保型替代品越来越受到关注,但其环境效益仍不明确,需要进一步评估。在这项工作中,利用生命周期评估(LCA)对从废咖啡渣(SCG)中提取总多酚(TPC)的案例进行了环境评估。首先,从环境角度确定了水和 20% 丙酮最方便的萃取时间(1、10、20 或 40 分钟)。其次,利用文献数据对不同溶剂--DES(氯化胆碱-1,6-己二醇)、水和 20%乙醇--的最佳萃取率条件进行了比较。第一项研究的结果表明,环境最优萃取时间(10 分钟)并不是产量最高的萃取时间。造成影响的主要因素是丙酮的使用和电力消耗。在第二项研究中,与 20% 乙醇和水相比,DES 在所有研究的环境影响类别中都表现较差。与水相比,20% 乙醇的提取率更高(分别为 9.2 毫克 TPC/g SCG 和 6.5 毫克 TPC/g SCG),因此是更好的选择。与 DES 系统相关的环境影响主要归因于 DES 制备步骤(需要原始原材料,如二甲基己二醇)和涉及树脂使用的吸附阶段。我们还进行了一项敏感性分析,将 DES 系统优化到最佳描述条件(90% 的 DES 重复利用率和最大限度地减少提取后用于吸附 TPC 的大孔树脂)。然而,在 16 个影响类别中,DES 系统在 11 个类别中的表现仍然不如水或 20% 乙醇系统。这项研究强调了在优化萃取工艺时考虑环境影响和产量的重要性,尤其是在实验室规模上,因为所获得的见解对于提高工业规模上的生态效率非常有价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Science of the Total Environment
Science of the Total Environment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
17.60
自引率
10.20%
发文量
8726
审稿时长
2.4 months
期刊介绍: The Science of the Total Environment is an international journal dedicated to scientific research on the environment and its interaction with humanity. It covers a wide range of disciplines and seeks to publish innovative, hypothesis-driven, and impactful research that explores the entire environment, including the atmosphere, lithosphere, hydrosphere, biosphere, and anthroposphere. The journal's updated Aims & Scope emphasizes the importance of interdisciplinary environmental research with broad impact. Priority is given to studies that advance fundamental understanding and explore the interconnectedness of multiple environmental spheres. Field studies are preferred, while laboratory experiments must demonstrate significant methodological advancements or mechanistic insights with direct relevance to the environment.
期刊最新文献
Complex interactions of rare earth elements in aquatic systems: Comparing observed and predicted cellular responses on Mytilus galloprovincialis. Identification of pesticide mixtures to which French agricultural workers and farm-owners are exposed: Results from the Agriculture and Cancer (AGRICAN) cohort study. Dog swimming and ectoparasiticide water contamination in urban conservation areas: A case study on Hampstead Heath, London. Exploring compost production potential and its economic benefits and greenhouse gas mitigation in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Graphene-encapsulated nanocomposites: Synthesis, environmental applications, and future prospects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1