Microbial necromass in soil profiles increases less efficiently than root biomass in long-term fenced grassland: Effects of microbial nitrogen limitation and soil depth.

IF 8.2 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Science of the Total Environment Pub Date : 2024-12-15 Epub Date: 2024-11-09 DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.177058
Baorong Wang, Yanxing Dou, Chao Liang, Chunhui Liu, Deng Ao, Hongjia Yao, Env Yang, Shaoshan An, Zhongming Wen
{"title":"Microbial necromass in soil profiles increases less efficiently than root biomass in long-term fenced grassland: Effects of microbial nitrogen limitation and soil depth.","authors":"Baorong Wang, Yanxing Dou, Chao Liang, Chunhui Liu, Deng Ao, Hongjia Yao, Env Yang, Shaoshan An, Zhongming Wen","doi":"10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.177058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Grassland fencing is acknowledged as a crucial initiative to enhance biodiversity and to increase soil organic carbon (SOC) content in ecologically fragile regions or barren systems. Theoretical perspectives propose that fencing induced an increase in root biomass, and its penetration into the soil profile introduced organic matter that facilitated SOC formation through microbial necromass and root residues. It is hypothesized that long-term grassland fencing increases root biomass, thereby enhancing SOC formation within the soil profile through microbial residues in badland ecosystems. To test this hypothesis, we selected grasslands subjected to varying durations of fencing post-grazing (i.e., 10, 15, 20, 30, and 40 y). Our investigation aimed to clarify microbial necromass dynamics in 0-100 cm soil profiles after fencing and to identify the influencing factors. Long-term grassland fencing (i.e., >30 y) increased root biomass by 160 %, SOC by 69 %, and necromass by 41 % compared to grazed grassland within the 0-40 cm horizon; in contrast, increased root biomass by 870 %, SOC by 111 %, and necromass by 46 % in the 40-100 cm horizon. Necromass in deep soil (40-100 cm) accounted for about 50 % of total residues in the 0-100 cm profile. Increased root and living microbial biomass stimulated the necromass accumulation, with a more pronounced increase in fungal residues compared with bacterial residues. Nonetheless, microbial nutrient limitation increases C or N-acquisition enzyme coefficients, which subsequently reduced fungal and bacterial residues and stimulated their recycling. Despite substantial increases in root biomass within the soil profile after fencing, limitation of microbial N and depth reduced the effectiveness of enhancing SOC and necromass. In conclusion, although microbial residues were the important source of SOC in grasslands of the Loess Plateau, microbial N limitation impeded necromass accumulation, and the interplay of root biomass, soil depth, and nutrient limitation regulated the dynamics of necromass following grassland fencing.</p>","PeriodicalId":422,"journal":{"name":"Science of the Total Environment","volume":" ","pages":"177058"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science of the Total Environment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.177058","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Grassland fencing is acknowledged as a crucial initiative to enhance biodiversity and to increase soil organic carbon (SOC) content in ecologically fragile regions or barren systems. Theoretical perspectives propose that fencing induced an increase in root biomass, and its penetration into the soil profile introduced organic matter that facilitated SOC formation through microbial necromass and root residues. It is hypothesized that long-term grassland fencing increases root biomass, thereby enhancing SOC formation within the soil profile through microbial residues in badland ecosystems. To test this hypothesis, we selected grasslands subjected to varying durations of fencing post-grazing (i.e., 10, 15, 20, 30, and 40 y). Our investigation aimed to clarify microbial necromass dynamics in 0-100 cm soil profiles after fencing and to identify the influencing factors. Long-term grassland fencing (i.e., >30 y) increased root biomass by 160 %, SOC by 69 %, and necromass by 41 % compared to grazed grassland within the 0-40 cm horizon; in contrast, increased root biomass by 870 %, SOC by 111 %, and necromass by 46 % in the 40-100 cm horizon. Necromass in deep soil (40-100 cm) accounted for about 50 % of total residues in the 0-100 cm profile. Increased root and living microbial biomass stimulated the necromass accumulation, with a more pronounced increase in fungal residues compared with bacterial residues. Nonetheless, microbial nutrient limitation increases C or N-acquisition enzyme coefficients, which subsequently reduced fungal and bacterial residues and stimulated their recycling. Despite substantial increases in root biomass within the soil profile after fencing, limitation of microbial N and depth reduced the effectiveness of enhancing SOC and necromass. In conclusion, although microbial residues were the important source of SOC in grasslands of the Loess Plateau, microbial N limitation impeded necromass accumulation, and the interplay of root biomass, soil depth, and nutrient limitation regulated the dynamics of necromass following grassland fencing.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在长期围栏草地上,土壤剖面中微生物坏死物质的增加效率低于根生物量的增加效率:微生物氮限制和土壤深度的影响。
草地围栏被认为是在生态脆弱地区或贫瘠系统中提高生物多样性和增加土壤有机碳(SOC)含量的重要举措。理论观点认为,围栏可诱导根系生物量的增加,其对土壤剖面的渗透可引入有机质,通过微生物坏死物和根系残留物促进 SOC 的形成。我们假设,长期的草原围栏会增加根部生物量,从而通过坏境生态系统中的微生物残体促进土壤剖面中有机碳的形成。为了验证这一假设,我们选择了放牧后围栏时间长短不一的草地(即 10、15、20、30 和 40 年)。我们的调查旨在明确围栏后 0-100 厘米土壤剖面中微生物死亡量的动态变化,并找出影响因素。与放牧草地相比,长期围栏(大于 30 年)使 0-40 厘米地层的根生物量增加了 160%,SOC 增加了 69%,坏死物质增加了 41%;相比之下,40-100 厘米地层的根生物量增加了 870%,SOC 增加了 111%,坏死物质增加了 46%。深层土壤(40-100 厘米)中的新生物量约占 0-100 厘米剖面中残留物总量的 50%。根部和活体微生物生物量的增加刺激了坏死物质的积累,与细菌残留物相比,真菌残留物的增加更为明显。然而,微生物的营养限制会增加碳或氮的获取酶系数,从而减少真菌和细菌的残留量,促进它们的循环。尽管围栏后土壤剖面内的根生物量大幅增加,但微生物氮和深度的限制降低了提高 SOC 和坏死物质的效果。总之,尽管微生物残留物是黄土高原草地SOC的重要来源,但微生物氮的限制阻碍了坏死物质的积累,根系生物量、土壤深度和养分限制的相互作用调节着草地围栏后坏死物质的动态变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Science of the Total Environment
Science of the Total Environment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
17.60
自引率
10.20%
发文量
8726
审稿时长
2.4 months
期刊介绍: The Science of the Total Environment is an international journal dedicated to scientific research on the environment and its interaction with humanity. It covers a wide range of disciplines and seeks to publish innovative, hypothesis-driven, and impactful research that explores the entire environment, including the atmosphere, lithosphere, hydrosphere, biosphere, and anthroposphere. The journal's updated Aims & Scope emphasizes the importance of interdisciplinary environmental research with broad impact. Priority is given to studies that advance fundamental understanding and explore the interconnectedness of multiple environmental spheres. Field studies are preferred, while laboratory experiments must demonstrate significant methodological advancements or mechanistic insights with direct relevance to the environment.
期刊最新文献
Spatial multi-criteria approaches for estimating geogenic radon hazard index. Exploring changes in epibenthic food web structure after implementation of a water-sediment regulation scheme. Exposure to microplastics contaminated with pharmaceuticals and personal care products: Histological effects on Ucides cordatus. Microbial necromass in soil profiles increases less efficiently than root biomass in long-term fenced grassland: Effects of microbial nitrogen limitation and soil depth. Trophic organization of the benthic communities off the South Italian coasts: A review with a modelistic approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1