Assessing CellaVision peripheral blood and advanced RBC application software's impact on hematologic morphology reporting: Real-world implementation experience in a large Veterans Affairs hospital.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 PATHOLOGY American journal of clinical pathology Pub Date : 2024-10-23 DOI:10.1093/ajcp/aqae146
Cory R Lundgren
{"title":"Assessing CellaVision peripheral blood and advanced RBC application software's impact on hematologic morphology reporting: Real-world implementation experience in a large Veterans Affairs hospital.","authors":"Cory R Lundgren","doi":"10.1093/ajcp/aqae146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This quality improvement study, conducted at the Kansas City Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Kansas City, Missouri, examined the change in patient reporting after transitioning from manual to CellaVision software-guided differentials and slide reviews. The primary focus was blasts and schistocytes, given their clinical significance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three months of manual and CellaVision patient data were examined between May 2022 and February 2023. Blast and schistocyte patients were standardized to the total specimens performed and compared using 2-sample proportion testing. Other red blood cell (RBC) morphologies were also compared using this statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Blast and schistocyte reporting after technologist review statistically increased after implementing the CellaVision software. This finding was most prevalent for low-percentage blasts. In addition, both morphologies experienced varying degrees of false-positive reporting, with 33% for low-percentage blasts and 91.7% for schistocytes. Other RBC morphologies displayed different levels of change, which could be clinically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The CellaVision software's increased sensitivity to blasts and schistocytes may benefit patient care, especially those with hematologic disorders. The software's high false-positive rate can be reduced by implementing quality metrics that prioritize clinically significant cells. This can be accomplished by implementing a CellaVision Champion to monitor reporting changes, perform patient lookbacks through the software, and provide technologist education. In addition, adopting a more stringent grading scale for schistocytes could also improve the high false-positive rate. Overall, CellaVision provides the ability to enhance hematology quality metrics by providing access to how patient cells are categorized and offering prompt education.</p>","PeriodicalId":7506,"journal":{"name":"American journal of clinical pathology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of clinical pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/aqae146","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This quality improvement study, conducted at the Kansas City Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Kansas City, Missouri, examined the change in patient reporting after transitioning from manual to CellaVision software-guided differentials and slide reviews. The primary focus was blasts and schistocytes, given their clinical significance.

Methods: Three months of manual and CellaVision patient data were examined between May 2022 and February 2023. Blast and schistocyte patients were standardized to the total specimens performed and compared using 2-sample proportion testing. Other red blood cell (RBC) morphologies were also compared using this statistical analysis.

Results: Blast and schistocyte reporting after technologist review statistically increased after implementing the CellaVision software. This finding was most prevalent for low-percentage blasts. In addition, both morphologies experienced varying degrees of false-positive reporting, with 33% for low-percentage blasts and 91.7% for schistocytes. Other RBC morphologies displayed different levels of change, which could be clinically significant.

Conclusions: The CellaVision software's increased sensitivity to blasts and schistocytes may benefit patient care, especially those with hematologic disorders. The software's high false-positive rate can be reduced by implementing quality metrics that prioritize clinically significant cells. This can be accomplished by implementing a CellaVision Champion to monitor reporting changes, perform patient lookbacks through the software, and provide technologist education. In addition, adopting a more stringent grading scale for schistocytes could also improve the high false-positive rate. Overall, CellaVision provides the ability to enhance hematology quality metrics by providing access to how patient cells are categorized and offering prompt education.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估 CellaVision 外周血和高级红细胞应用软件对血液学形态报告的影响:一家大型退伍军人事务医院的实际实施经验。
目标:这项质量改进研究在密苏里州堪萨斯城的堪萨斯城退伍军人事务医疗中心(Kansas City Veterans Affairs Medical Center)进行,考察了从人工鉴别过渡到 CellaVision 软件指导的鉴别和玻片审查后患者报告的变化。主要重点是囊泡和裂殖细胞,因为它们具有重要的临床意义:检查了 2022 年 5 月至 2023 年 2 月期间三个月的人工和 CellaVision 患者数据。将囊泡和血吸虫患者与所做标本总数进行标准化,并使用双样本比例测试进行比较。其他红细胞(RBC)形态也采用这种统计分析方法进行比较:结果:在使用 CellaVision 软件后,经技术专家审核后的血块和血吸虫报告在统计学上有所增加。这一结果在低百分比血泡中最为普遍。此外,这两种形态都出现了不同程度的假阳性报告,低百分比血泡的假阳性率为 33%,裂殖细胞的假阳性率为 91.7%。其他红细胞形态也出现了不同程度的变化,这可能具有临床意义:结论:CellaVision 软件提高了对囊泡和裂形细胞的灵敏度,这可能有利于患者的治疗,尤其是血液病患者。该软件的高假阳性率可以通过实施优先处理有临床意义细胞的质量指标来降低。这可以通过实施 CellaVision Champion 来实现,CellaVision Champion 负责监控报告变化,通过软件对患者进行回访,并对技术人员进行教育。此外,对血吸虫细胞采用更严格的分级标准也能改善高假阳性率的问题。总之,CellaVision 通过提供对患者细胞分类的访问和及时的教育,提高了血液学质量指标的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
2.90%
发文量
367
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Clinical Pathology (AJCP) is the official journal of the American Society for Clinical Pathology and the Academy of Clinical Laboratory Physicians and Scientists. It is a leading international journal for publication of articles concerning novel anatomic pathology and laboratory medicine observations on human disease. AJCP emphasizes articles that focus on the application of evolving technologies for the diagnosis and characterization of diseases and conditions, as well as those that have a direct link toward improving patient care.
期刊最新文献
Coagulation abnormalities following brown recluse spider (Loxosceles reclusa) envenomation: A description of 2 cases and review of the literature. Continued harmonization of the international normalized ratio across a large laboratory network: Evidence of sustained low interlaboratory variation and bias after a change in instrumentation. Thinking like a pathologist: Morphologic approach to hepatobiliary tumors by ChatGPT. Evaluating pathologist practices in peripheral blood smear review: A comprehensive practice survey. Umbilical cord blood as a substitute for neonatal blood in measuring serum albumin and immunoglobulin G levels.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1