Clinical Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Left Main Coronary Artery Disease in Patients of Diverse Race/Ethnicity.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-10-22 DOI:10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.10.002
Pier Pasquale Leone, Samantha Sartori, Jonathan Murphy, Kenneth Smith, Angelo Oliva, Mauro Gitto, Benjamin Bay, Anastasios Roumeliotis, Birgit Vogel, David Power, Anton Camaj, Francesca Maria Di Muro, Annapoorna Kini, Samin Sharma, Roxana Mehran, George Dangas
{"title":"Clinical Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Left Main Coronary Artery Disease in Patients of Diverse Race/Ethnicity.","authors":"Pier Pasquale Leone, Samantha Sartori, Jonathan Murphy, Kenneth Smith, Angelo Oliva, Mauro Gitto, Benjamin Bay, Anastasios Roumeliotis, Birgit Vogel, David Power, Anton Camaj, Francesca Maria Di Muro, Annapoorna Kini, Samin Sharma, Roxana Mehran, George Dangas","doi":"10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.10.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Data on percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease in patients of diverse race/ethnicity are scant. This study aimed to assess the impact of race/ethnicity on clinical outcomes at 12-month follow-up of patients with LMCA disease who underwent PCI with drug-eluting stent implantation. All patients who underwent PCI for LMCA disease between 2010 and 2019 at a tertiary care center were prospectively enrolled. Clinical outcomes were assessed per each race/ethnic group. The primary end point was the composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, or stroke at 12 months. A total of 774 consecutive patients with known race/ethnicity were prospectively enrolled (62.1% [n = 481] Caucasian, 17.2% [n = 133] Hispanic, 12.7% [n = 98] Asian, and 8.0% [n = 62] African-American). Compared with Caucasians, the hazard rate of the primary end point tended to be lower in Asian patients (6.1% vs 14.2%; hazard ratio [HR] 0.41, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.16 to 1.03) and similar in African-American (13.7% vs 14.2%; HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.40 to 2.16) and Hispanic patients (14.2% vs 14.2%; HR 1.02, 95% CI 0.58 to 1.78). Hazard rates of target vessel or lesion revascularization were comparable among the 4 groups. Cox multivariable regression adjustment confirmed consistent findings and revealed higher hazard rates of postdischarge bleeding in African-Americans compared with Caucasians (HR 5.89, 95% CI 1.00 to 34.5). In conclusion, within a racially/ethnically diverse cohort of patients who underwent PCI for LMCA disease, when compared with Caucasians, Asians had lower risk of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, or stroke, whereas African-Americans had increased risk of postdischarge bleeding. Condensed abstract Evidence on percutaneous coronary intervention for left main coronary artery disease in patients of diverse race/ethnicity is limited. Among 774 consecutively enrolled patients from diverse racial/ethnic backgrounds, Asians tended to experience a lower hazard for all-cause death, myocardial infarction, or stroke compared with Caucasians. A higher hazard rate of postdischarge bleeding was observed in African-Americans compared with Caucasians. Further dedicated prospective studies enrolling racial/ethnic minorities are needed to confirm the presence of effect modification in clinical outcomes based on racial/ethnic background.What is knownWhat the study adds.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.10.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Data on percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease in patients of diverse race/ethnicity are scant. This study aimed to assess the impact of race/ethnicity on clinical outcomes at 12-month follow-up of patients with LMCA disease who underwent PCI with drug-eluting stent implantation. All patients who underwent PCI for LMCA disease between 2010 and 2019 at a tertiary care center were prospectively enrolled. Clinical outcomes were assessed per each race/ethnic group. The primary end point was the composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, or stroke at 12 months. A total of 774 consecutive patients with known race/ethnicity were prospectively enrolled (62.1% [n = 481] Caucasian, 17.2% [n = 133] Hispanic, 12.7% [n = 98] Asian, and 8.0% [n = 62] African-American). Compared with Caucasians, the hazard rate of the primary end point tended to be lower in Asian patients (6.1% vs 14.2%; hazard ratio [HR] 0.41, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.16 to 1.03) and similar in African-American (13.7% vs 14.2%; HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.40 to 2.16) and Hispanic patients (14.2% vs 14.2%; HR 1.02, 95% CI 0.58 to 1.78). Hazard rates of target vessel or lesion revascularization were comparable among the 4 groups. Cox multivariable regression adjustment confirmed consistent findings and revealed higher hazard rates of postdischarge bleeding in African-Americans compared with Caucasians (HR 5.89, 95% CI 1.00 to 34.5). In conclusion, within a racially/ethnically diverse cohort of patients who underwent PCI for LMCA disease, when compared with Caucasians, Asians had lower risk of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, or stroke, whereas African-Americans had increased risk of postdischarge bleeding. Condensed abstract Evidence on percutaneous coronary intervention for left main coronary artery disease in patients of diverse race/ethnicity is limited. Among 774 consecutively enrolled patients from diverse racial/ethnic backgrounds, Asians tended to experience a lower hazard for all-cause death, myocardial infarction, or stroke compared with Caucasians. A higher hazard rate of postdischarge bleeding was observed in African-Americans compared with Caucasians. Further dedicated prospective studies enrolling racial/ethnic minorities are needed to confirm the presence of effect modification in clinical outcomes based on racial/ethnic background.What is knownWhat the study adds.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同种族/族裔患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗左主干冠状动脉疾病后的临床疗效。
有关不同种族/族裔患者接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)治疗左冠状动脉主干(LMCA)疾病的数据很少。本研究旨在评估种族/民族对接受药物洗脱支架植入经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的 LMCA 患者在 12 个月随访期间的临床结果的影响。2010年至2019年期间,在一家三级医疗中心接受PCI治疗的所有LMCA疾病患者均被纳入前瞻性研究。对每个种族/民族组的临床结果进行了评估。主要终点是12个月后全因死亡、心肌梗死(MI)或中风的复合死亡率。共有 774 名已知种族/族裔的连续患者进行了前瞻性登记,其中 62.1%(n=481)为白种人,17.2%(n=133)为西班牙裔人,12.7%(n=98)为亚裔人,8.0%(n=62)为非裔美国人。与白种人相比,亚裔患者的主要终点危险率往往较低(6.1% vs 14.2%;危险比 [HR]:0.41;95% 置信区间 [CI]:0.16-1.03):非裔美国人(13.7% vs 14.2%;HR:0.93;95% CI:0.40-2.16)和西班牙裔患者(14.2% vs 14.2%;HR:1.02;95% CI:0.58-1.78)的情况相似。)四组患者的靶血管或病变血运重建危险率相当。考克斯多变量回归调整证实了一致的研究结果,并显示非裔美国人出院后出血的危险率高于白种人(HR:5.89;95% CI:1.00-34.5)。总之,在一个因 LMCA 疾病而接受 PCI 治疗的种族/民族多样化患者队列中,与白种人相比,亚洲人发生全因死亡、心肌梗死或中风的风险较低,而非裔美国人出院后出血的风险较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1