Impact of Multiarterial versus Single Arterial Coronary Bypass Graft Surgery on Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-10-22 DOI:10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.10.004
Qin Jiang, Keli Huang, Shanshan Lin, Deliang Wang, Zhiai Tang, Shengshou Hu
{"title":"Impact of Multiarterial versus Single Arterial Coronary Bypass Graft Surgery on Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation.","authors":"Qin Jiang, Keli Huang, Shanshan Lin, Deliang Wang, Zhiai Tang, Shengshou Hu","doi":"10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.10.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The effect of multiarterial (MA) versus single arterial (SA) coronary bypass graft surgery on postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) was not investigated. From May 2017 to May 2024, the patients with CYP2C19*2 or *3 allele receiving coronary artery grafting and postoperational aspirin 100 mg/day and clopidogrel 75 mg/day were retrospectively reviewed and assigned to the MA or SA group. The primary end point was the incidence rate of POAF in the first week. The secondary end points were POAF burden, platelet aggregation, systemic immune-inflammation index, and heart rate variability. The study included 58 cases in the MA group and 174 cases in the SA group. The incidence of POAF was 17% in the MA group, contrasting with 42% in the SA group (hazard ratio 0.353, 95% confidence interval 0.218 to 0.569, p = 0.0012). A lower POAF burden was observed in the MA group than in SA group (2 [1 to 5] vs 10 hours [6 to 20], p = 0.02). Platelet aggregation (arachidonic acid: 46 ± 10% vs 56 ± 8%, p <0.01; adenosine diphosphate: 58 ± 17% vs 75 ± 13%, p <0.01) and inflammation response index (neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio: 26 ± 4 vs 28 ± 5, p = 0.006; systemic immune-inflammation index: 5,019 ± 771 vs 5,382 ± 1,204, p = 0.032) was notably lower in MA group than those in SA group at 1 day after coronary artery bypass grafting. Holter electrocardiogram showed a higher heart rate variability value in the SD of the normal-to-normal RR intervals and decreased low frequency/high frequency ratio in the MA group. In conclusion, MA was associated with a lower incidence rate of POAF and paralleled with a lower atrial fibrillation burden, platelet aggregation, and inflammation reaction and a higher parasympathetic nerve tone than the SA regimen.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.10.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The effect of multiarterial (MA) versus single arterial (SA) coronary bypass graft surgery on postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) was not investigated. From May 2017 to May 2024, the patients with CYP2C19*2 or *3 allele receiving coronary artery grafting and postoperational aspirin 100 mg/day and clopidogrel 75 mg/day were retrospectively reviewed and assigned to the MA or SA group. The primary end point was the incidence rate of POAF in the first week. The secondary end points were POAF burden, platelet aggregation, systemic immune-inflammation index, and heart rate variability. The study included 58 cases in the MA group and 174 cases in the SA group. The incidence of POAF was 17% in the MA group, contrasting with 42% in the SA group (hazard ratio 0.353, 95% confidence interval 0.218 to 0.569, p = 0.0012). A lower POAF burden was observed in the MA group than in SA group (2 [1 to 5] vs 10 hours [6 to 20], p = 0.02). Platelet aggregation (arachidonic acid: 46 ± 10% vs 56 ± 8%, p <0.01; adenosine diphosphate: 58 ± 17% vs 75 ± 13%, p <0.01) and inflammation response index (neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio: 26 ± 4 vs 28 ± 5, p = 0.006; systemic immune-inflammation index: 5,019 ± 771 vs 5,382 ± 1,204, p = 0.032) was notably lower in MA group than those in SA group at 1 day after coronary artery bypass grafting. Holter electrocardiogram showed a higher heart rate variability value in the SD of the normal-to-normal RR intervals and decreased low frequency/high frequency ratio in the MA group. In conclusion, MA was associated with a lower incidence rate of POAF and paralleled with a lower atrial fibrillation burden, platelet aggregation, and inflammation reaction and a higher parasympathetic nerve tone than the SA regimen.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多动脉与单动脉冠状动脉旁路移植手术对术后心房颤动的影响。
多动脉(MA)与单动脉(SA)冠状动脉旁路移植手术对术后心房颤动(POAF)的影响尚未进行研究。自2017年5月至2024年5月,对CYP2C19*2或*3等位基因患者接受冠状动脉移植术和术后阿司匹林100毫克/天和氯吡格雷75毫克/天进行回顾性回顾,并将其分配到MA组或SA组。主要终点是第一周的 POAF 发生率。次要终点为 POAF 负担、血小板聚集、全身免疫炎症(SII)指数和心率变异性(HRV)。研究纳入了 58 例 MA 组病例和 174 例 SA 组病例。MA 组的 POAF 发生率为 17%,而 SA 组为 42%(危险比:0.353;95% 置信区间:0.218 至 0.569,P=0.0012)。在 MA 组观察到的 POAF 负担低于 SA 组(2 h [1, 5] 对 10 h [6, 20], P=0.02)。血小板聚集(花生四烯酸,46%±10% 对 56%±8%,P
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1