The temporal trajectories of habit decay in daily life: An intensive longitudinal study on four health-risk behaviors.

IF 3.8 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Applied psychology. Health and well-being Pub Date : 2024-10-25 DOI:10.1111/aphw.12612
Robert Edgren, Dario Baretta, Jennifer Inauen
{"title":"The temporal trajectories of habit decay in daily life: An intensive longitudinal study on four health-risk behaviors.","authors":"Robert Edgren, Dario Baretta, Jennifer Inauen","doi":"10.1111/aphw.12612","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Habits are cue-behavior associations learned through repetition that are assumed to be relatively stable. Thereby, unhealthy habits can pose a health risk due to facilitating relapse. In the absence of research on habit decay in daily life, we aimed to investigate how habit decreases over time when trying to degrade a habit and whether this differs by four health-risk behaviors (sedentary behavior, unhealthy snacking, alcohol consumption, and smoking). This 91-day intensive longitudinal study included four parallel non-randomized groups (one per behavior; N = 194). Habit strength was measured daily with the Self-Report Behavioral Automaticity Index (11,805 observations) and modelled over time with constant, linear, quadratic, cubic, asymptotic, and logistic models. Person-specific modelling revealed asymptotic and logistic models as the most common best-fitting models (54% of the sample). The time for habit decay to stabilize ranged from 1 to 65 days. Multilevel modelling indicated substantial between-person heterogeneity and suggested initial habit strength but not the decay process to vary by behavioral group. Findings suggest that habit decay when trying to degrade a habit typically follows a decelerating negative trend but that it is a highly idiosyncratic process. Recommendations include emphasizing the role of person-specific modelling and data visualization in habit research.</p>","PeriodicalId":8127,"journal":{"name":"Applied psychology. Health and well-being","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied psychology. Health and well-being","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aphw.12612","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Habits are cue-behavior associations learned through repetition that are assumed to be relatively stable. Thereby, unhealthy habits can pose a health risk due to facilitating relapse. In the absence of research on habit decay in daily life, we aimed to investigate how habit decreases over time when trying to degrade a habit and whether this differs by four health-risk behaviors (sedentary behavior, unhealthy snacking, alcohol consumption, and smoking). This 91-day intensive longitudinal study included four parallel non-randomized groups (one per behavior; N = 194). Habit strength was measured daily with the Self-Report Behavioral Automaticity Index (11,805 observations) and modelled over time with constant, linear, quadratic, cubic, asymptotic, and logistic models. Person-specific modelling revealed asymptotic and logistic models as the most common best-fitting models (54% of the sample). The time for habit decay to stabilize ranged from 1 to 65 days. Multilevel modelling indicated substantial between-person heterogeneity and suggested initial habit strength but not the decay process to vary by behavioral group. Findings suggest that habit decay when trying to degrade a habit typically follows a decelerating negative trend but that it is a highly idiosyncratic process. Recommendations include emphasizing the role of person-specific modelling and data visualization in habit research.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
日常生活中习惯衰退的时间轨迹:对四种健康风险行为的深入纵向研究。
习惯是通过重复而学会的线索-行为关联,被认为是相对稳定的。因此,不健康的习惯会导致复发,从而对健康构成威胁。由于缺乏对日常生活中习惯衰退的研究,我们的目的是调查在试图降低习惯时,习惯是如何随着时间的推移而降低的,以及四种健康风险行为(久坐不动、不健康的零食、饮酒和吸烟)是否存在差异。这项为期 91 天的强化纵向研究包括四个平行的非随机小组(每个行为一个小组;N = 194)。习惯强度每天通过自我报告行为自动性指数(11805 个观测值)进行测量,并通过常数、线性、二次方、三次方、渐近和逻辑模型对其进行建模。针对个人的建模显示,渐近模型和逻辑模型是最常见的最佳拟合模型(占样本的 54%)。习惯衰减趋于稳定的时间从 1 天到 65 天不等。多层次建模表明人与人之间存在很大的异质性,并表明初始习惯强度因行为组别而异,但衰减过程却不尽相同。研究结果表明,在试图降低习惯强度时,习惯的衰减通常会遵循一个减速的负趋势,但这是一个高度特异性的过程。建议包括在习惯研究中强调因人而异的建模和数据可视化的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
2.90%
发文量
95
期刊介绍: Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being is a triannual peer-reviewed academic journal published by Wiley-Blackwell on behalf of the International Association of Applied Psychology. It was established in 2009 and covers applied psychology topics such as clinical psychology, counseling, cross-cultural psychology, and environmental psychology.
期刊最新文献
Daily relationship satisfaction and markers of health: Findings from a smartphone-based assessment. Evaluation of a meaning in life intervention applied to work: A randomized clinical trial. Applying machine learning to understand the role of social-emotional skills on subjective well-being and physical health. Subjective well-being of children with special educational needs: Longitudinal predictors using machine learning. Increasing student well-being through a positive psychology intervention: changes in salivary cortisol, depression, psychological well-being, and hope.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1