Determinants Associated with COVID-19 Vaccination among Korean Adults: Based on Andersen's Model.

IF 2.5 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Behavioral Sciences Pub Date : 2024-10-08 DOI:10.3390/bs14100905
Eungyeong Kim
{"title":"Determinants Associated with COVID-19 Vaccination among Korean Adults: Based on Andersen's Model.","authors":"Eungyeong Kim","doi":"10.3390/bs14100905","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>COVID-19 vaccination is a critical public health measure to control the pandemic, but disparities in vaccination uptake remain a concern. This study investigates the determinants of COVID-19 vaccination among Korean adults using the Andersen model. Data from 231,784 participants in the community health survey were analyzed using chi-square testing and logistic regression. The risk of non-vaccination was higher among those aged 19-64 (95% CI: 1.52-1.74), males (95% CI: 1.11-1.24), the unemployed (95% CI: 2.21-2.47), unmarried individuals (95% CI: 1.12-1.24), those with unmet healthcare needs (95% CI: 1.41-1.67), recipients of national basic livelihood guarantees (95% CI: 1.45-1.73), those with lower subjective health (95% CI: 1.20-1.30), individuals with depression (95% CI: 1.28-1.44), current smokers (95% CI: 1.13-1.30), and those skipping breakfast (95% CI: 1.04-1.16). Conversely, the risk was lower for those with less than a high school education (95% CI: 0.72-0.81), individuals with psychological concerns about infection (0.87, 95% CI: 0.82-0.92) or public criticism (0.91, 95% CI: 0.86-0.97), individuals with chronic diseases (95% CI: 0.64-0.72), and current alcohol consumers (95% CI: 0.52-0.58). These findings underscore the need for targeted intervention strategies and support systems to promote vaccination in vulnerable populations. Further research should explore the long-term impact of these interventions on vaccination uptake.</p>","PeriodicalId":8742,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Sciences","volume":"14 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11505588/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14100905","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

COVID-19 vaccination is a critical public health measure to control the pandemic, but disparities in vaccination uptake remain a concern. This study investigates the determinants of COVID-19 vaccination among Korean adults using the Andersen model. Data from 231,784 participants in the community health survey were analyzed using chi-square testing and logistic regression. The risk of non-vaccination was higher among those aged 19-64 (95% CI: 1.52-1.74), males (95% CI: 1.11-1.24), the unemployed (95% CI: 2.21-2.47), unmarried individuals (95% CI: 1.12-1.24), those with unmet healthcare needs (95% CI: 1.41-1.67), recipients of national basic livelihood guarantees (95% CI: 1.45-1.73), those with lower subjective health (95% CI: 1.20-1.30), individuals with depression (95% CI: 1.28-1.44), current smokers (95% CI: 1.13-1.30), and those skipping breakfast (95% CI: 1.04-1.16). Conversely, the risk was lower for those with less than a high school education (95% CI: 0.72-0.81), individuals with psychological concerns about infection (0.87, 95% CI: 0.82-0.92) or public criticism (0.91, 95% CI: 0.86-0.97), individuals with chronic diseases (95% CI: 0.64-0.72), and current alcohol consumers (95% CI: 0.52-0.58). These findings underscore the need for targeted intervention strategies and support systems to promote vaccination in vulnerable populations. Further research should explore the long-term impact of these interventions on vaccination uptake.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
韩国成年人接种 COVID-19 疫苗的相关决定因素:基于安徒生模型
接种 COVID-19 疫苗是控制疫情的一项重要公共卫生措施,但疫苗接种率的差异仍然令人担忧。本研究利用安徒生模型调查了韩国成年人接种 COVID-19 疫苗的决定因素。研究使用卡方检验和逻辑回归分析了 231,784 名社区健康调查参与者的数据。未接种疫苗的风险较高的人群包括:19-64 岁(95% CI:1.52-1.74)、男性(95% CI:1.11-1.24)、失业者(95% CI:2.21-2.47)、未婚者(95% CI:1.12-1.24)、医疗保健需求未得到满足者(95% CI:1.41-1.67)、国家基本医疗保险受惠者(95% CI:1.41-1.67)。67)、国家基本生活保障领取者(95% CI:1.45-1.73)、主观健康水平较低者(95% CI:1.20-1.30)、抑郁症患者(95% CI:1.28-1.44)、当前吸烟者(95% CI:1.13-1.30)和不吃早餐者(95% CI:1.04-1.16)。相反,高中以下学历者(95% CI:0.72-0.81)、对感染有心理顾虑者(0.87,95% CI:0.82-0.92)或公众批评者(0.91,95% CI:0.86-0.97)、慢性病患者(95% CI:0.64-0.72)和目前饮酒者(95% CI:0.52-0.58)的风险较低。这些发现强调了有必要制定有针对性的干预策略和支持系统,以促进弱势群体接种疫苗。进一步的研究应探讨这些干预措施对疫苗接种率的长期影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Behavioral Sciences
Behavioral Sciences Social Sciences-Development
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
429
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Baseline Mood and "Relational Triad" Predict Acute Qualities of Psychedelic Experience. Pandemic Babies: Developmental Outcomes in Preschool-Aged Children Born During the COVID-19 Era. Observational Comparison of Outcomes of Sandplay Therapy (SPT-SAFE) Versus Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT-BI) for Elementary School Students with NSSI and Suicidal Ideation: A Retrospective School-Based Study. Sex-Based Mechanisms of Stress-Induced Alcohol-Seeking. People Are Unwilling to Help Others Pursue a Luxury Life: Egocentric or Other-Centric Motivations?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1