A systematic review of the side effects of high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation of uterine fibroids.

Q3 Medicine Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings Pub Date : 2024-08-21 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1080/08998280.2024.2387497
Mostafa Maged Ali, Chileshe Raphael Mpehle, Esther Olusola, Phuti Khomotso Ratshabedi, Ahmed Ragab Shehata, Mohamed Ashraf Youssef, Ebtehal Ali Helal Farag
{"title":"A systematic review of the side effects of high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation of uterine fibroids.","authors":"Mostafa Maged Ali, Chileshe Raphael Mpehle, Esther Olusola, Phuti Khomotso Ratshabedi, Ahmed Ragab Shehata, Mohamed Ashraf Youssef, Ebtehal Ali Helal Farag","doi":"10.1080/08998280.2024.2387497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A new intervention called high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) targets fibroids with high-intensity ultrasound pulses using ultrasound probes. This noninvasive method, which can be carried out with either magnetic resonance imaging or ultrasound guidance, results in immediate coagulated necrosis within a clearly defined area a few millimeters in diameter.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review evaluated the safety of HIFU in the treatment of uterine fibroids regardless of site or size. We specifically aimed to determine the incidence of side effects that can occur during and after HIFU. We searched the PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and Mendeley archive using only the terms HIFU and fibroid. After identifying 1077 studies of different types from 2014 to March 2024, 300 studies were screened and 60 included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>According to Society of Interventional Radiology guidelines, class A adverse events (AEs) showed no significant results, and individuals with these AEs required no treatment and had no long-term consequences. Similarly, there were no class B significant results. However, 3943 of 10,204 patients (38%) complained of lower abdominal pain after the procedure, a class B AE, which resolved by analgesics. Further, 153 of 24,700 patients (0.6%) had skin burns, blisters, or nodules, and these issues resolved with conservative treatment. Additionally, 74 of 23,741 patients (0.3%) had hematuria; 882 of 5970 patients (14.7%) had abnormal vaginal discharge; 414 of 23,449 (1.7%) had vaginal bleeding; and 267 of 7598 (3.5%) had leg paresthesia. Major AEs (class C and D) were almost nonexistent, and the incidence of death in our study was zero.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>HIFU ablation of uterine fibroids is generally safe, causing mostly mild side effects and very few severe complications. The relative safety of HIFU compared to other minimally invasive techniques, such as uterine artery embolization, still needs further evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":8828,"journal":{"name":"Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings","volume":"37 6","pages":"947-956"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11492634/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08998280.2024.2387497","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A new intervention called high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) targets fibroids with high-intensity ultrasound pulses using ultrasound probes. This noninvasive method, which can be carried out with either magnetic resonance imaging or ultrasound guidance, results in immediate coagulated necrosis within a clearly defined area a few millimeters in diameter.

Methods: This systematic review evaluated the safety of HIFU in the treatment of uterine fibroids regardless of site or size. We specifically aimed to determine the incidence of side effects that can occur during and after HIFU. We searched the PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and Mendeley archive using only the terms HIFU and fibroid. After identifying 1077 studies of different types from 2014 to March 2024, 300 studies were screened and 60 included.

Results: According to Society of Interventional Radiology guidelines, class A adverse events (AEs) showed no significant results, and individuals with these AEs required no treatment and had no long-term consequences. Similarly, there were no class B significant results. However, 3943 of 10,204 patients (38%) complained of lower abdominal pain after the procedure, a class B AE, which resolved by analgesics. Further, 153 of 24,700 patients (0.6%) had skin burns, blisters, or nodules, and these issues resolved with conservative treatment. Additionally, 74 of 23,741 patients (0.3%) had hematuria; 882 of 5970 patients (14.7%) had abnormal vaginal discharge; 414 of 23,449 (1.7%) had vaginal bleeding; and 267 of 7598 (3.5%) had leg paresthesia. Major AEs (class C and D) were almost nonexistent, and the incidence of death in our study was zero.

Conclusion: HIFU ablation of uterine fibroids is generally safe, causing mostly mild side effects and very few severe complications. The relative safety of HIFU compared to other minimally invasive techniques, such as uterine artery embolization, still needs further evaluation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
子宫肌瘤高强度聚焦超声消融术副作用的系统性回顾。
背景:一种名为高强度聚焦超声(HIFU)的新型干预方法是利用超声探头以高强度超声脉冲治疗子宫肌瘤。这种无创方法可在磁共振成像或超声引导下进行,可在直径几毫米的明确界定区域内立即凝固坏死:本系统性综述评估了 HIFU 治疗子宫肌瘤的安全性,无论肌瘤的部位或大小。我们的具体目标是确定 HIFU 治疗过程中和治疗后可能出现的副作用的发生率。我们仅使用 HIFU 和子宫肌瘤这两个术语在 PubMed、Scopus、ScienceDirect 和 Mendeley 档案库中进行了搜索。在确定了2014年至2024年3月期间的1077项不同类型的研究后,筛选出300项研究,并纳入了60项研究:根据介入放射学会的指南,A级不良事件(AEs)未显示出显著结果,出现这些不良事件的患者无需治疗,也不会产生长期后果。同样,也没有出现 B 级重大结果。不过,10204 名患者中有 3943 人(38%)在手术后抱怨下腹疼痛,属于 B 级不良事件,但服用镇痛药后疼痛缓解。此外,24700 名患者中有 153 人(0.6%)出现皮肤灼伤、水泡或结节,这些问题在保守治疗后都得到了解决。此外,23741 位患者中有 74 位(0.3%)出现血尿;5970 位患者中有 882 位(14.7%)出现阴道分泌物异常;23449 位患者中有 414 位(1.7%)出现阴道出血;7598 位患者中有 267 位(3.5%)出现腿部麻痹。在我们的研究中,几乎不存在重大 AE(C 级和 D 级),死亡发生率为零:结论:HIFU消融术治疗子宫肌瘤总体上是安全的,大部分副作用较轻,很少出现严重并发症。与其他微创技术(如子宫动脉栓塞术)相比,HIFU 的相对安全性仍需进一步评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
245
期刊最新文献
The importance of screening and surveillance: Barrett's esophagus and esophageal cancer. A brief descriptive analysis of a pilot study of peer support training and supervision for Texas firefighters. Contrast-associated acute kidney injury: How can we do better? "In a word, partnership"-lessons from a student-led health fair. A review of professionalism in surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1