首页 > 最新文献

Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings最新文献

英文 中文
Avocations. 业余爱好。
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-12-23 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/08998280.2025.2586997
{"title":"Avocations.","authors":"","doi":"10.1080/08998280.2025.2586997","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08998280.2025.2586997","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":8828,"journal":{"name":"Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings","volume":"39 1","pages":"83"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12818377/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146017270","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Temporal analysis of sickle cell disease mortality in adults (1999-2020): insights from the CDC WONDER database. 成人镰状细胞病死亡率的时间分析(1999-2020):来自CDC WONDER数据库的见解
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-12-23 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/08998280.2025.2582390
Abdullah Ahmad, Anna L Bode, Abdul Rafeh Awan, Muhammad Ahmad Nadeem, Tomas Escobar Gil, Fatima Naveed, Zain Ali Nadeem, Jibran Ikram, Abdullah Khan, Amir H Sohail, Abu Baker Sheikh

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate temporal trends in adult sickle cell disease (SCD) mortality in the United States from 1999 to 2020, stratified by age, sex, race, and geography, to identify disparities and guide targeted interventions.

Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted using national mortality data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiological Research (CDC WONDER) database. The sample included adults aged ≥15 years who died from SCD between 1999 and 2020 (n = 17,443). Age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMRs) were calculated and stratified by demographic and geographic variables. Temporal trends were assessed using Mann-Kendall trend tests, and t-tests were applied to compare continuous variables across subgroups. Statistical significance was defined as P < 0.05.

Results: The AAMR for adult SCD increased by 132% over the study period (P = 0.014). The greatest rise in mortality was observed among adults aged ≥65 years (P = 0.008) and women (P = 0.015). Black individuals accounted for 97.5% of SCD-related deaths, underscoring severe racial disparities. Geographically, the Southern region exhibited the highest AAMR and was the only region with a statistically significant increase in mortality over time (P = 0.001).

Conclusions: Adult SCD mortality in the United States has risen significantly from 1999 to 2020, with disproportionate increases among older adults, women, and individuals in the Southern region. The findings highlight urgent needs for targeted national interventions, development of age-specific care models, and implementation of equity-focused health policies to address persistent racial and regional disparities in SCD outcomes.

目的:本研究旨在评估1999年至2020年美国成人镰状细胞病(SCD)死亡率的时间趋势,按年龄、性别、种族和地理分层,以确定差异并指导有针对性的干预措施。方法:使用疾病控制和预防中心流行病学研究广泛在线数据(CDC WONDER)数据库中的国家死亡率数据进行回顾性观察研究。样本包括1999年至2020年间死于SCD的年龄≥15岁的成年人(n = 17,443)。计算年龄调整死亡率(AAMRs),并按人口统计学和地理变量分层。使用Mann-Kendall趋势检验评估时间趋势,并应用t检验比较亚组间的连续变量。结果:成人SCD的AAMR在研究期间增加了132% (P = 0.014)。≥65岁的成年人(P = 0.008)和女性(P = 0.015)的死亡率上升幅度最大。黑人占scd相关死亡的97.5%,强调了严重的种族差异。从地理上看,南部地区的AAMR最高,是死亡率随时间增加的唯一有统计学意义的地区(P = 0.001)。结论:从1999年到2020年,美国成人SCD死亡率显著上升,在老年人、女性和南部地区的个人中,SCD死亡率的增长不成比例。研究结果强调,迫切需要有针对性的国家干预措施,开发针对特定年龄的护理模式,并实施以公平为重点的卫生政策,以解决SCD结果中持续存在的种族和地区差异。
{"title":"Temporal analysis of sickle cell disease mortality in adults (1999-2020): insights from the CDC WONDER database.","authors":"Abdullah Ahmad, Anna L Bode, Abdul Rafeh Awan, Muhammad Ahmad Nadeem, Tomas Escobar Gil, Fatima Naveed, Zain Ali Nadeem, Jibran Ikram, Abdullah Khan, Amir H Sohail, Abu Baker Sheikh","doi":"10.1080/08998280.2025.2582390","DOIUrl":"10.1080/08998280.2025.2582390","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate temporal trends in adult sickle cell disease (SCD) mortality in the United States from 1999 to 2020, stratified by age, sex, race, and geography, to identify disparities and guide targeted interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective observational study was conducted using national mortality data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiological Research (CDC WONDER) database. The sample included adults aged ≥15 years who died from SCD between 1999 and 2020 (n = 17,443). Age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMRs) were calculated and stratified by demographic and geographic variables. Temporal trends were assessed using Mann-Kendall trend tests, and <i>t</i>-tests were applied to compare continuous variables across subgroups. Statistical significance was defined as <i>P</i> < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The AAMR for adult SCD increased by 132% over the study period (<i>P</i> = 0.014). The greatest rise in mortality was observed among adults aged ≥65 years (<i>P</i> = 0.008) and women (<i>P</i> = 0.015). Black individuals accounted for 97.5% of SCD-related deaths, underscoring severe racial disparities. Geographically, the Southern region exhibited the highest AAMR and was the only region with a statistically significant increase in mortality over time (<i>P</i> = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Adult SCD mortality in the United States has risen significantly from 1999 to 2020, with disproportionate increases among older adults, women, and individuals in the Southern region. The findings highlight urgent needs for targeted national interventions, development of age-specific care models, and implementation of equity-focused health policies to address persistent racial and regional disparities in SCD outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":8828,"journal":{"name":"Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings","volume":"39 1","pages":"48-56"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12758797/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145899505","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Liberal versus restrictive transfusion strategies in patients with acute brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. 急性脑损伤患者的自由与限制性输血策略:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-12-10 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/08998280.2025.2586988
AlMothana M Manasrah, Mazen Alayidh, Ahmed A Ibrahim, Ahmed A Maiz, Mohamed Rifai, Shaden Alayidh, Sara A Al Asheikh, Ali Alaklah, Mohamed Saad Rakab, Mustafa Turkmani, Mohamed Abuelazm

Background: Anemia has been observed in up to 46% of individuals with acute brain injury. Blood transfusions are commonly performed to raise hemoglobin levels, so we aimed to compare the restrictive and liberal blood transfusion strategies in acute brain injury patients.

Methods: A systematic search was conducted on Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane, and Medline/PubMed up to February 10, 2025. Continuous data were combined using mean differences (MD), and dichotomous outcomes were synthesized using risk ratios (RR); both were detailed with a 95% confidence interval (CI), applying R software (version 4.3). This study was registered and published with PROSPERO (ID CRD42025630392).

Results: The analysis incorporated six randomized controlled trials involving 2599 participants. There were no substantial variations between the liberal and restrictive transfusion groups in unfavorable neurological outcomes (RR: 0.90 [95% CI: 0.79-1.03]; P = 0.13), favorable neurological outcomes (RR: 1.16 [95% CI: 1.00-1.35]; P = 0.05), hospital length of stay (MD: -0.66 [95% CI: -2.48-1.16]; P = 0.48), or intensive care unit length of stay (MD: 0.15 [95% CI: -0.68-0.99]; P = 0.72). However, the liberal transfusion strategy was accompanied with an increased number of red cell units transfused (MD: 2.28, 95% CI: [1.75-2.80]; P < 0.01) and reduced sepsis or septic shock compared to the restrictive strategy (RR: 0.73 [95% CI: 0.56-0.96]; P = 0.02).

Conclusion: The liberal strategy of blood transfusion for patients with acute brain injury and anemia did not impact neurological outcomes. It reduced the incidence of sepsis or septic shock, but this came with an increase in the number of red blood cells transfused without affecting overall mortality or thrombotic events.

背景:高达46%的急性脑损伤患者存在贫血。输血通常是为了提高血红蛋白水平,因此我们的目的是比较急性脑损伤患者的限制性和自由输血策略。方法:系统检索截至2025年2月10日的Web of Science、Embase、Scopus、Cochrane和Medline/PubMed。连续数据采用平均差异(MD)合并,二分类结果采用风险比(RR)综合;采用R软件(版本4.3),以95%置信区间(CI)对两者进行详细分析。该研究已在PROSPERO注册并发表(ID CRD42025630392)。结果:分析纳入6项随机对照试验,涉及2599名受试者。自由输血组和限制性输血组在不良神经预后(RR: 0.90 [95% CI: 0.79-1.03]; P = 0.13)、良好神经预后(RR: 1.16 [95% CI: 1.00-1.35]; P = 0.05)、住院时间(MD: -0.66 [95% CI: -2.48-1.16]; P = 0.48)或重症监护病房住院时间(MD: 0.15 [95% CI: -0.68-0.99]; P = 0.72)方面均无显著差异。然而,自由输血策略伴随着红细胞输入数量的增加(MD: 2.28, 95% CI: [1.75-2.80]; P P = 0.02)。结论:急性脑损伤合并贫血患者的自由输血策略对神经系统预后无影响。它降低了脓毒症或脓毒性休克的发生率,但这伴随着红细胞输注数量的增加,而不影响总体死亡率或血栓形成事件。
{"title":"Liberal versus restrictive transfusion strategies in patients with acute brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"AlMothana M Manasrah, Mazen Alayidh, Ahmed A Ibrahim, Ahmed A Maiz, Mohamed Rifai, Shaden Alayidh, Sara A Al Asheikh, Ali Alaklah, Mohamed Saad Rakab, Mustafa Turkmani, Mohamed Abuelazm","doi":"10.1080/08998280.2025.2586988","DOIUrl":"10.1080/08998280.2025.2586988","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anemia has been observed in up to 46% of individuals with acute brain injury. Blood transfusions are commonly performed to raise hemoglobin levels, so we aimed to compare the restrictive and liberal blood transfusion strategies in acute brain injury patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted on Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane, and Medline/PubMed up to February 10, 2025. Continuous data were combined using mean differences (MD), and dichotomous outcomes were synthesized using risk ratios (RR); both were detailed with a 95% confidence interval (CI), applying R software (version 4.3). This study was registered and published with PROSPERO (ID CRD42025630392).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis incorporated six randomized controlled trials involving 2599 participants. There were no substantial variations between the liberal and restrictive transfusion groups in unfavorable neurological outcomes (RR: 0.90 [95% CI: 0.79-1.03]; <i>P</i> = 0.13), favorable neurological outcomes (RR: 1.16 [95% CI: 1.00-1.35]; <i>P</i> = 0.05), hospital length of stay (MD: -0.66 [95% CI: -2.48-1.16]; <i>P</i> = 0.48), or intensive care unit length of stay (MD: 0.15 [95% CI: -0.68-0.99]; <i>P</i> = 0.72). However, the liberal transfusion strategy was accompanied with an increased number of red cell units transfused (MD: 2.28, 95% CI: [1.75-2.80]; <i>P</i> < 0.01) and reduced sepsis or septic shock compared to the restrictive strategy (RR: 0.73 [95% CI: 0.56-0.96]; <i>P</i> = 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The liberal strategy of blood transfusion for patients with acute brain injury and anemia did not impact neurological outcomes. It reduced the incidence of sepsis or septic shock, but this came with an increase in the number of red blood cells transfused without affecting overall mortality or thrombotic events.</p>","PeriodicalId":8828,"journal":{"name":"Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings","volume":"39 1","pages":"139-151"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12778877/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145931702","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Trends and racial disparities in mortality related to acute respiratory distress syndrome. 与急性呼吸窘迫综合征相关的死亡率趋势和种族差异。
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-12-05 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/08998280.2025.2584764
Nikhil Furtado, Sydney Ball, Taylor Billion, Mohsin Mirza

Background: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality, particularly among critically ill patients with limited treatment options. This study analyzed long-term trends in ARDS mortality in the US, focusing on racial disparities. By examining mortality rates across racial, regional, and gender groups, the study identified demographic and geographic inequalities to inform targeted interventions.

Methods: ARDS mortality data from 1999 to 2022 was obtained from the CDC WONDER database. Age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMRs) were stratified by sex, race, and US census region. Joinpoint regression was used to calculate annual percentage changes (APCs) and average annual percent change (AAPC).

Results: The overall AAMR increased from 7.40 (1999) to a peak of 21.72 (2021) before declining to 8.49 (2022, AAPC: 2.92). American Indians had the highest AAMR, increasing from 13.8 (1999) to 18.89 (2022, AAPC: 4.37). Asians had the lowest AAMR, declining from 7.4 (1999) to 6.17 (2022). AAMRs declined from 1999 to 2017, surged from 2017 to 2020, and dropped after 2022. Regional disparities were notable among the Northeast and Midwest, with Black populations having higher mortality.

Conclusion: ARDS mortality trends worsened during the COVID-19 pandemic, disproportionately affecting American Indian and Black populations. Addressing these disparities requires equitable healthcare policies and further research into social determinants of health.

背景:急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)是发病率和死亡率的重要原因,特别是在治疗选择有限的危重患者中。本研究分析了美国ARDS死亡率的长期趋势,重点关注种族差异。通过检查不同种族、地区和性别群体的死亡率,该研究确定了人口和地理上的不平等,为有针对性的干预措施提供信息。方法:1999 - 2022年ARDS死亡率数据来源于CDC WONDER数据库。年龄调整死亡率(AAMRs)按性别、种族和美国人口普查地区分层。采用连接点回归计算年变化百分比(APCs)和平均年变化百分比(AAPC)。结果:总体AAMR由7.40(1999)上升至21.72(2021)的峰值,随后下降至8.49 (2022),AAPC为2.92。美洲印第安人的AAMR最高,从1999年的13.8增加到2022年的18.89 (AAPC: 4.37)。亚洲的AAMR最低,从1999年的7.4降至2022年的6.17。1999年至2017年,aamr呈下降趋势,2017年至2020年呈上升趋势,2022年之后呈下降趋势。东北部和中西部的地区差异明显,黑人死亡率较高。结论:在COVID-19大流行期间,ARDS死亡率趋势恶化,对美洲印第安人和黑人的影响尤为严重。解决这些差异需要公平的保健政策和对健康的社会决定因素的进一步研究。
{"title":"Trends and racial disparities in mortality related to acute respiratory distress syndrome.","authors":"Nikhil Furtado, Sydney Ball, Taylor Billion, Mohsin Mirza","doi":"10.1080/08998280.2025.2584764","DOIUrl":"10.1080/08998280.2025.2584764","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality, particularly among critically ill patients with limited treatment options. This study analyzed long-term trends in ARDS mortality in the US, focusing on racial disparities. By examining mortality rates across racial, regional, and gender groups, the study identified demographic and geographic inequalities to inform targeted interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>ARDS mortality data from 1999 to 2022 was obtained from the CDC WONDER database. Age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMRs) were stratified by sex, race, and US census region. Joinpoint regression was used to calculate annual percentage changes (APCs) and average annual percent change (AAPC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall AAMR increased from 7.40 (1999) to a peak of 21.72 (2021) before declining to 8.49 (2022, AAPC: 2.92). American Indians had the highest AAMR, increasing from 13.8 (1999) to 18.89 (2022, AAPC: 4.37). Asians had the lowest AAMR, declining from 7.4 (1999) to 6.17 (2022). AAMRs declined from 1999 to 2017, surged from 2017 to 2020, and dropped after 2022. Regional disparities were notable among the Northeast and Midwest, with Black populations having higher mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ARDS mortality trends worsened during the COVID-19 pandemic, disproportionately affecting American Indian and Black populations. Addressing these disparities requires equitable healthcare policies and further research into social determinants of health.</p>","PeriodicalId":8828,"journal":{"name":"Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings","volume":"39 1","pages":"57-63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12758318/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145899500","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Avocations. 业余爱好。
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-12-04 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/08998280.2025.2586996
Alejandro Arroliga
{"title":"Avocations.","authors":"Alejandro Arroliga","doi":"10.1080/08998280.2025.2586996","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08998280.2025.2586996","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":8828,"journal":{"name":"Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings","volume":"39 1","pages":"28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12758312/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145899273","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Squeezing out better outcomes with abdominal compression devices. 使用腹部压迫装置效果更好。
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-11-20 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/08998280.2025.2583009
Katerina Wells
{"title":"Squeezing out better outcomes with abdominal compression devices.","authors":"Katerina Wells","doi":"10.1080/08998280.2025.2583009","DOIUrl":"10.1080/08998280.2025.2583009","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":8828,"journal":{"name":"Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings","volume":"39 1","pages":"109"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12778865/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145931894","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Safety and efficacy of endoscopic submucosal dissection vs endoscopic mucosal resection in managing gastrointestinal tract tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. 内镜下粘膜夹层与内镜下粘膜切除术治疗胃肠道肿瘤的安全性和有效性:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-11-20 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/08998280.2025.2583724
Adnan Bhat, Ajay Kumar, Humza Saeed, Zahra Ali, Anchit Chauhan, Muhammad Hamza, Unaiza Iftikhar, Adil Ahmed, Peter Draganov

Background: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) are minimally invasive alternatives to surgery for gastrointestinal tumors, differing in technique, indications, and outcomes. This meta-analysis compared the efficacy and safety of ESD vs EMR.

Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, PubMed, Cochrane, Google Scholar, and Scopus were searched. Binary outcomes were pooled as odds ratios (ORs) and continuous outcomes as standardized mean differences (SMDs), with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), using a random-effects model. Analyses were performed in R (v4.4.1), with significance set at P < 0.05.

Results: Twenty-five studies with 5283 patients (2234 ESD, 3049 EMR) were included. ESD achieved higher complete resection (OR, 5.77; 95% CI, 2.18-15.26; P < 0.001; I 2 = 91%) and en bloc resection rates (OR, 13.46; 95% CI, 5.91-30.64; P < 0.001; I 2 = 82%). It required longer procedural time (SMD, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.26-2.19; P < 0.01) but had lower piecemeal resection (OR, 0.06; 95% CI, 0.01-0.38; P = 0.003). Postendoscopic resection coagulation syndrome (PECS) was more frequent with ESD (OR, 2.40; 95% CI, 1.25-4.61; P = 0.008). No significant differences were found in delayed bleeding (P = 0.06) or recurrence (P = 0.61).

Conclusions: ESD provides superior complete and en bloc resection compared with EMR but involves longer procedures and higher PECS risk. Large-scale trials are needed to refine comparative outcomes.

背景:内镜下粘膜剥离(ESD)和内镜下粘膜切除(EMR)是胃肠道肿瘤手术的微创替代方案,在技术、适应证和结果上有所不同。本荟萃分析比较了ESD与EMR的疗效和安全性。方法:按照PRISMA指南,检索PubMed、Cochrane、谷歌Scholar和Scopus。使用随机效应模型,将二元结果合并为优势比(or),将连续结果合并为标准化平均差异(SMDs),并设置95%置信区间(ci)。结果:纳入25项研究,5283例患者(2234例ESD, 3049例EMR)。ESD具有较高的完全切除率(OR, 5.77; 95% CI, 2.18-15.26; p2 = 91%)和整体切除率(OR, 13.46; 95% CI, 5.91-30.64; p2 = 82%)。需要更长的手术时间(SMD, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.26-2.19; P = 0.003)。内镜下切除后凝血综合征(PECS)在ESD患者中更为常见(OR, 2.40; 95% CI, 1.25-4.61; P = 0.008)。延迟出血(P = 0.06)和复发率(P = 0.61)差异无统计学意义。结论:与EMR相比,ESD提供了更好的完整和整体切除,但手术时间更长,PECS风险更高。需要大规模试验来完善比较结果。
{"title":"Safety and efficacy of endoscopic submucosal dissection vs endoscopic mucosal resection in managing gastrointestinal tract tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Adnan Bhat, Ajay Kumar, Humza Saeed, Zahra Ali, Anchit Chauhan, Muhammad Hamza, Unaiza Iftikhar, Adil Ahmed, Peter Draganov","doi":"10.1080/08998280.2025.2583724","DOIUrl":"10.1080/08998280.2025.2583724","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) are minimally invasive alternatives to surgery for gastrointestinal tumors, differing in technique, indications, and outcomes. This meta-analysis compared the efficacy and safety of ESD vs EMR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following PRISMA guidelines, PubMed, Cochrane, Google Scholar, and Scopus were searched. Binary outcomes were pooled as odds ratios (ORs) and continuous outcomes as standardized mean differences (SMDs), with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), using a random-effects model. Analyses were performed in R (v4.4.1), with significance set at <i>P</i> < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-five studies with 5283 patients (2234 ESD, 3049 EMR) were included. ESD achieved higher complete resection (OR, 5.77; 95% CI, 2.18-15.26; <i>P</i> < 0.001; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 91%) and en bloc resection rates (OR, 13.46; 95% CI, 5.91-30.64; <i>P</i> < 0.001; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 82%). It required longer procedural time (SMD, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.26-2.19; <i>P</i> < 0.01) but had lower piecemeal resection (OR, 0.06; 95% CI, 0.01-0.38; <i>P</i> = 0.003). Postendoscopic resection coagulation syndrome (PECS) was more frequent with ESD (OR, 2.40; 95% CI, 1.25-4.61; <i>P</i> = 0.008). No significant differences were found in delayed bleeding (<i>P</i> = 0.06) or recurrence (<i>P</i> = 0.61).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ESD provides superior complete and en bloc resection compared with EMR but involves longer procedures and higher PECS risk. Large-scale trials are needed to refine comparative outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":8828,"journal":{"name":"Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings","volume":"39 1","pages":"119-127"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12758251/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145899457","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The impact of diet on MASLD-even when you're lean. 饮食对masld的影响——即使你很瘦。
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-11-20 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/08998280.2025.2588917
Stevan A Gonzalez
{"title":"The impact of diet on MASLD-even when you're lean.","authors":"Stevan A Gonzalez","doi":"10.1080/08998280.2025.2588917","DOIUrl":"10.1080/08998280.2025.2588917","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":8828,"journal":{"name":"Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings","volume":"39 1","pages":"37-38"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12758292/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145899450","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Safety and efficacy of novel potassium binders for chronic hyperkalemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. 新型钾结合剂治疗慢性高钾血症的安全性和有效性:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-11-19 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/08998280.2025.2581466
Abdul Ahad Riaz, Zuhair Abrar, Fatima Fayyaz Cheema, Nida Ayesha, Dhruvi Khoont, Zukhruf Fatima, Muhammad Usama Javaid, Ahmad Haroon, Anas M Din Bashir, Uzair Jafar, Huzaifa Ahmad Cheema, Bilawal Nadeem, Muhammad Aslam Khan, Saad Ur Rehman, Raheel Ahmed

Objective: Hyperkalemia is a potentially life-threatening electrolyte imbalance that contributes to increased morbidity and mortality in patients with heart failure (HF) and chronic kidney disease (CKD). Novel potassium binders (NPBs) have been shown to prevent hyperkalemia; however, their efficacy and safety have not been fully established.

Methods: We searched various electronic databases, including MEDLINE (via PubMed), Embase, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov, to retrieve randomized controlled trials comparing NPB to placebo in patients with chronic hyperkalemia due to HF or CKD.

Results: Our meta-analysis, including 12 studies involving 2517 patients, showed that NPBs, including patiromer and sodium zirconium cyclosilicate, were associated with significant mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) optimization (relative risk [RR]: 1.28; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.14-1.43) as compared to placebo. The results were consistent for subgroups of sodium zirconium cyclosilicate, patiromer, CKD, and HF. NPBs also significantly reduced the incidence of hyperkalemia (RR: 0.37; 95% CI: 0.22-0.6). Additionally, NPBs reduced the mean serum potassium level from baseline as compared to placebo (mean difference: -0.46; 95% CI: -0.77 to -0.15) and MRA optimization at less than the target dose (RR: 0.62; 95% CI: 0.42-0.85). The risk of adverse events, serious adverse events, and all-cause mortality remained comparable between the two groups.

Conclusion: This meta-analysis highlights the potential of NPBs to facilitate MRA optimization, reduce hyperkalemic episodes, and maintain serum potassium levels in patients with hyperkalemia, without a corresponding increase in adverse events. However, further research through large-scale studies is needed to confirm the sustained clinical benefits of NPBs, establish standardized treatment protocols, and evaluate their effectiveness across diverse patient populations with CKD and HF.

高钾血症是一种潜在危及生命的电解质失衡,导致心力衰竭(HF)和慢性肾脏疾病(CKD)患者的发病率和死亡率增加。新型钾结合剂(NPBs)已被证明可以预防高钾血症;然而,它们的有效性和安全性尚未完全确定。方法:我们检索了各种电子数据库,包括MEDLINE(通过PubMed)、Embase、Cochrane图书馆和ClinicalTrials.gov,检索了比较NPB和安慰剂在HF或CKD所致慢性高钾血症患者中的随机对照试验。结果:我们的荟萃分析,包括涉及2517例患者的12项研究,显示与安慰剂相比,NPBs,包括帕特罗默和环硅酸锆钠,与显著的矿皮质激素受体拮抗剂(MRA)优化相关(相对风险[RR]: 1.28; 95%可信区间[CI]: 1.14-1.43)。结果与环硅酸锆钠、帕特罗默、CKD和HF亚组一致。NPBs还显著降低了高钾血症的发生率(RR: 0.37; 95% CI: 0.22-0.6)。此外,与安慰剂相比,NPBs降低了平均血清钾水平(平均差异:-0.46;95% CI: -0.77至-0.15)和低于目标剂量时的MRA优化(RR: 0.62; 95% CI: 0.42-0.85)。不良事件、严重不良事件和全因死亡率的风险在两组之间保持可比性。结论:该荟萃分析强调了NPBs在促进MRA优化、减少高钾血症发作和维持高钾血症患者血清钾水平方面的潜力,而不会相应增加不良事件。然而,需要进一步的大规模研究来证实NPBs的持续临床益处,建立标准化的治疗方案,并评估其在不同CKD和HF患者群体中的有效性。
{"title":"Safety and efficacy of novel potassium binders for chronic hyperkalemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Abdul Ahad Riaz, Zuhair Abrar, Fatima Fayyaz Cheema, Nida Ayesha, Dhruvi Khoont, Zukhruf Fatima, Muhammad Usama Javaid, Ahmad Haroon, Anas M Din Bashir, Uzair Jafar, Huzaifa Ahmad Cheema, Bilawal Nadeem, Muhammad Aslam Khan, Saad Ur Rehman, Raheel Ahmed","doi":"10.1080/08998280.2025.2581466","DOIUrl":"10.1080/08998280.2025.2581466","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Hyperkalemia is a potentially life-threatening electrolyte imbalance that contributes to increased morbidity and mortality in patients with heart failure (HF) and chronic kidney disease (CKD). Novel potassium binders (NPBs) have been shown to prevent hyperkalemia; however, their efficacy and safety have not been fully established.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched various electronic databases, including MEDLINE (via PubMed), Embase, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov, to retrieve randomized controlled trials comparing NPB to placebo in patients with chronic hyperkalemia due to HF or CKD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our meta-analysis, including 12 studies involving 2517 patients, showed that NPBs, including patiromer and sodium zirconium cyclosilicate, were associated with significant mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) optimization (relative risk [RR]: 1.28; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.14-1.43) as compared to placebo. The results were consistent for subgroups of sodium zirconium cyclosilicate, patiromer, CKD, and HF. NPBs also significantly reduced the incidence of hyperkalemia (RR: 0.37; 95% CI: 0.22-0.6). Additionally, NPBs reduced the mean serum potassium level from baseline as compared to placebo (mean difference: -0.46; 95% CI: -0.77 to -0.15) and MRA optimization at less than the target dose (RR: 0.62; 95% CI: 0.42-0.85). The risk of adverse events, serious adverse events, and all-cause mortality remained comparable between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This meta-analysis highlights the potential of NPBs to facilitate MRA optimization, reduce hyperkalemic episodes, and maintain serum potassium levels in patients with hyperkalemia, without a corresponding increase in adverse events. However, further research through large-scale studies is needed to confirm the sustained clinical benefits of NPBs, establish standardized treatment protocols, and evaluate their effectiveness across diverse patient populations with CKD and HF.</p>","PeriodicalId":8828,"journal":{"name":"Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings","volume":"39 1","pages":"110-118"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12758214/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145899465","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Real-world evidence of the impact of aspirin use on esophageal cancer incidence in Barrett's esophagus patients. 阿司匹林对巴雷特食管患者食管癌发病率影响的真实证据
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-11-14 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/08998280.2025.2583631
Ismail Elkhattib, Mohamed Elnaggar, Ahmed Farid Gadelmawla, Mohamed Abuelazm, Ameer Awashra, Mazen Ibrahem, Zain Sobani, Houman Rezaizadeh, Khaled Elfert

Purpose: Barrett's esophagus (BE) is the main precursor to esophageal adenocarcinoma, a cancer with a significantly rising incidence. While proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the standard therapy for managing BE, the chemopreventive role of aspirin is an area of growing interest with inconclusive evidence, particularly regarding its use in combination with PPIs. This study aimed to assess whether adding aspirin to PPI therapy reduces the incidence of esophageal cancer in patients with BE more than PPIs alone.

Methods: A nationwide retrospective cohort study was conducted using the TriNetX database. Adult patients with BE were divided into two cohorts: those receiving aspirin plus a PPI and those receiving a PPI only. Propensity score matching was used to balance baseline demographics and clinical comorbidities. The primary outcome was the incidence of malignant neoplasm of the lower third of the esophagus. Subgroup analyses were also performed for low-dose (81 mg) and high-dose (300-325 mg) aspirin.

Results: After matching, each cohort included 88,184 patients. The cohort receiving aspirin and PPIs had a lower risk of developing esophageal cancer compared to the PPI-only cohort (odds ratio [OR] 0.799, 95% CI: 0.679-0.941). The protective association was observed in both high-dose (OR 0.643) and low-dose (OR 0.664) aspirin subgroups, suggesting a potential dose-dependent effect.

Conclusion: This large, real-world analysis suggests that the concurrent use of aspirin with PPIs is associated with a reduced risk of esophageal cancer in patients with BE.

目的:Barrett食管(BE)是食管腺癌的主要前体,是一种发病率显著上升的癌症。虽然质子泵抑制剂(PPIs)是治疗BE的标准疗法,但阿司匹林的化学预防作用是一个越来越受关注的领域,证据不确定,特别是关于它与PPIs联合使用。本研究旨在评估在PPI治疗中加入阿司匹林是否比单独使用PPI更能降低BE患者食管癌的发生率。方法:使用TriNetX数据库进行全国回顾性队列研究。成年BE患者被分为两组:服用阿司匹林加PPI的和只服用PPI的。倾向评分匹配用于平衡基线人口统计学和临床合并症。主要结局是食管下三分之一的恶性肿瘤发生率。还对低剂量(81 mg)和高剂量(300-325 mg)阿司匹林进行了亚组分析。结果:配对后,每个队列纳入88184例患者。接受阿司匹林和PPIs的队列与仅接受PPIs的队列相比,患食管癌的风险较低(优势比[OR] 0.799, 95% CI: 0.679-0.941)。在高剂量(OR 0.643)和低剂量(OR 0.664)阿司匹林亚组中均观察到这种保护性关联,提示存在潜在的剂量依赖效应。结论:这项大规模的现实分析表明,同时使用阿司匹林和PPIs与BE患者食管癌风险降低相关。
{"title":"Real-world evidence of the impact of aspirin use on esophageal cancer incidence in Barrett's esophagus patients.","authors":"Ismail Elkhattib, Mohamed Elnaggar, Ahmed Farid Gadelmawla, Mohamed Abuelazm, Ameer Awashra, Mazen Ibrahem, Zain Sobani, Houman Rezaizadeh, Khaled Elfert","doi":"10.1080/08998280.2025.2583631","DOIUrl":"10.1080/08998280.2025.2583631","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Barrett's esophagus (BE) is the main precursor to esophageal adenocarcinoma, a cancer with a significantly rising incidence. While proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the standard therapy for managing BE, the chemopreventive role of aspirin is an area of growing interest with inconclusive evidence, particularly regarding its use in combination with PPIs. This study aimed to assess whether adding aspirin to PPI therapy reduces the incidence of esophageal cancer in patients with BE more than PPIs alone.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A nationwide retrospective cohort study was conducted using the TriNetX database. Adult patients with BE were divided into two cohorts: those receiving aspirin plus a PPI and those receiving a PPI only. Propensity score matching was used to balance baseline demographics and clinical comorbidities. The primary outcome was the incidence of malignant neoplasm of the lower third of the esophagus. Subgroup analyses were also performed for low-dose (81 mg) and high-dose (300-325 mg) aspirin.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After matching, each cohort included 88,184 patients. The cohort receiving aspirin and PPIs had a lower risk of developing esophageal cancer compared to the PPI-only cohort (odds ratio [OR] 0.799, 95% CI: 0.679-0.941). The protective association was observed in both high-dose (OR 0.643) and low-dose (OR 0.664) aspirin subgroups, suggesting a potential dose-dependent effect.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This large, real-world analysis suggests that the concurrent use of aspirin with PPIs is associated with a reduced risk of esophageal cancer in patients with BE.</p>","PeriodicalId":8828,"journal":{"name":"Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings","volume":"39 1","pages":"17-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12758260/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145899461","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1