Robert Möbius, Dirk Winkler, Fabian Kropla, Marcel Müller, Sebastian Scholz, Erdem Güresir, Ronny Grunert
{"title":"ARISE-The Accuracy Evaluation of a Patient-Specific 3D-Printed Biopsy System Based on MRI Data: A Cadaveric Study.","authors":"Robert Möbius, Dirk Winkler, Fabian Kropla, Marcel Müller, Sebastian Scholz, Erdem Güresir, Ronny Grunert","doi":"10.3390/bioengineering11101013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Brain biopsy is required for the accurate specification and further diagnosis of intracranial findings. The conventional stereotactic frames are used clinically for biopsies and offer the highest possible precision. Unfortunately, they come with some insurmountable technical and logistical limitations. The aim of the present work is to determine the clinical precision in the needle biopsy of the human brain using a new patient-specific stereotactic navigation device based on 3D printing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MRI data sets of human cadaver heads were used to plan 32 intracranial virtual biopsy targets located in different brain regions. Based on these data, 16 individualized stereotactic frames were 3D-printed. After the intraoperative application of the stereotactic device to the cadaver's head, the actual needle position was verified by postoperative CT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-two brain areas were successfully biopsied. The target point accuracy was 1.05 ± 0.63 mm, which represents the difference between the planned and real target points. The largest target point deviation was in the coronal plane at 0.60 mm; the smallest was in the transverse plane (0.45 mm).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Three-dimensional-printed, personalized stereotactic frames or platforms are an alternative to the commonly used frame-based and frameless stereotactic systems. They are particularly advantageous in terms of accuracy, reduced medical imaging, and significantly simplified intraoperative handling.</p>","PeriodicalId":8874,"journal":{"name":"Bioengineering","volume":"11 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11505023/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioengineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering11101013","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Brain biopsy is required for the accurate specification and further diagnosis of intracranial findings. The conventional stereotactic frames are used clinically for biopsies and offer the highest possible precision. Unfortunately, they come with some insurmountable technical and logistical limitations. The aim of the present work is to determine the clinical precision in the needle biopsy of the human brain using a new patient-specific stereotactic navigation device based on 3D printing.
Methods: MRI data sets of human cadaver heads were used to plan 32 intracranial virtual biopsy targets located in different brain regions. Based on these data, 16 individualized stereotactic frames were 3D-printed. After the intraoperative application of the stereotactic device to the cadaver's head, the actual needle position was verified by postoperative CT.
Results: Thirty-two brain areas were successfully biopsied. The target point accuracy was 1.05 ± 0.63 mm, which represents the difference between the planned and real target points. The largest target point deviation was in the coronal plane at 0.60 mm; the smallest was in the transverse plane (0.45 mm).
Conclusions: Three-dimensional-printed, personalized stereotactic frames or platforms are an alternative to the commonly used frame-based and frameless stereotactic systems. They are particularly advantageous in terms of accuracy, reduced medical imaging, and significantly simplified intraoperative handling.
期刊介绍:
Aims
Bioengineering (ISSN 2306-5354) provides an advanced forum for the science and technology of bioengineering. It publishes original research papers, comprehensive reviews, communications and case reports. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. All aspects of bioengineering are welcomed from theoretical concepts to education and applications. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. There are, in addition, four key features of this Journal:
● We are introducing a new concept in scientific and technical publications “The Translational Case Report in Bioengineering”. It is a descriptive explanatory analysis of a transformative or translational event. Understanding that the goal of bioengineering scholarship is to advance towards a transformative or clinical solution to an identified transformative/clinical need, the translational case report is used to explore causation in order to find underlying principles that may guide other similar transformative/translational undertakings.
● Manuscripts regarding research proposals and research ideas will be particularly welcomed.
● Electronic files and software regarding the full details of the calculation and experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material.
● We also accept manuscripts communicating to a broader audience with regard to research projects financed with public funds.
Scope
● Bionics and biological cybernetics: implantology; bio–abio interfaces
● Bioelectronics: wearable electronics; implantable electronics; “more than Moore” electronics; bioelectronics devices
● Bioprocess and biosystems engineering and applications: bioprocess design; biocatalysis; bioseparation and bioreactors; bioinformatics; bioenergy; etc.
● Biomolecular, cellular and tissue engineering and applications: tissue engineering; chromosome engineering; embryo engineering; cellular, molecular and synthetic biology; metabolic engineering; bio-nanotechnology; micro/nano technologies; genetic engineering; transgenic technology
● Biomedical engineering and applications: biomechatronics; biomedical electronics; biomechanics; biomaterials; biomimetics; biomedical diagnostics; biomedical therapy; biomedical devices; sensors and circuits; biomedical imaging and medical information systems; implants and regenerative medicine; neurotechnology; clinical engineering; rehabilitation engineering
● Biochemical engineering and applications: metabolic pathway engineering; modeling and simulation
● Translational bioengineering