Alison L Ingraldi, Tim Allen, Joseph N Tinghitella, William C Merritt, Timothy Becker, Aaron J Tabor
{"title":"Characterization of Amnion-Derived Membrane for Clinical Wound Applications.","authors":"Alison L Ingraldi, Tim Allen, Joseph N Tinghitella, William C Merritt, Timothy Becker, Aaron J Tabor","doi":"10.3390/bioengineering11100953","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Human amniotic membrane (hAM), the innermost placental layer, has unique properties that allow for a multitude of clinical applications. It is a common misconception that birth-derived tissue products, such as dual-layered dehydrated amnion-amnion graft (dHAAM), are similar regardless of the manufacturing steps. A commercial dHAAM product, Axolotl Biologix DualGraft™, was assessed for biological and mechanical characteristics. Testing of dHAAM included antimicrobial, cellular biocompatibility, proteomics analysis, suture strength, and tensile, shear, and compressive modulus testing. Results demonstrated that the membrane can be a scaffold for fibroblast growth (cellular biocompatibility), containing an average total of 7678 unique proteins, 82,296 peptides, and 96,808 peptide ion variants that may be antimicrobial. Suture strength results showed an average pull force of 0.2 N per dHAAM sample (equating to a pull strength of 8.5 MPa). Tensile modulus data revealed variation, with wet samples showing 5× lower stiffness than dry samples. The compressive modulus and shear modulus displayed differences between donors (lots). This study emphasizes the need for standardized processing protocols to ensure consistency across dHAAM products and future research to explore comparative analysis with other amniotic membrane products. These findings provide baseline data supporting the potential of amniotic membranes in clinical applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":8874,"journal":{"name":"Bioengineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11504399/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioengineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering11100953","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Human amniotic membrane (hAM), the innermost placental layer, has unique properties that allow for a multitude of clinical applications. It is a common misconception that birth-derived tissue products, such as dual-layered dehydrated amnion-amnion graft (dHAAM), are similar regardless of the manufacturing steps. A commercial dHAAM product, Axolotl Biologix DualGraft™, was assessed for biological and mechanical characteristics. Testing of dHAAM included antimicrobial, cellular biocompatibility, proteomics analysis, suture strength, and tensile, shear, and compressive modulus testing. Results demonstrated that the membrane can be a scaffold for fibroblast growth (cellular biocompatibility), containing an average total of 7678 unique proteins, 82,296 peptides, and 96,808 peptide ion variants that may be antimicrobial. Suture strength results showed an average pull force of 0.2 N per dHAAM sample (equating to a pull strength of 8.5 MPa). Tensile modulus data revealed variation, with wet samples showing 5× lower stiffness than dry samples. The compressive modulus and shear modulus displayed differences between donors (lots). This study emphasizes the need for standardized processing protocols to ensure consistency across dHAAM products and future research to explore comparative analysis with other amniotic membrane products. These findings provide baseline data supporting the potential of amniotic membranes in clinical applications.
期刊介绍:
Aims
Bioengineering (ISSN 2306-5354) provides an advanced forum for the science and technology of bioengineering. It publishes original research papers, comprehensive reviews, communications and case reports. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. All aspects of bioengineering are welcomed from theoretical concepts to education and applications. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. There are, in addition, four key features of this Journal:
● We are introducing a new concept in scientific and technical publications “The Translational Case Report in Bioengineering”. It is a descriptive explanatory analysis of a transformative or translational event. Understanding that the goal of bioengineering scholarship is to advance towards a transformative or clinical solution to an identified transformative/clinical need, the translational case report is used to explore causation in order to find underlying principles that may guide other similar transformative/translational undertakings.
● Manuscripts regarding research proposals and research ideas will be particularly welcomed.
● Electronic files and software regarding the full details of the calculation and experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material.
● We also accept manuscripts communicating to a broader audience with regard to research projects financed with public funds.
Scope
● Bionics and biological cybernetics: implantology; bio–abio interfaces
● Bioelectronics: wearable electronics; implantable electronics; “more than Moore” electronics; bioelectronics devices
● Bioprocess and biosystems engineering and applications: bioprocess design; biocatalysis; bioseparation and bioreactors; bioinformatics; bioenergy; etc.
● Biomolecular, cellular and tissue engineering and applications: tissue engineering; chromosome engineering; embryo engineering; cellular, molecular and synthetic biology; metabolic engineering; bio-nanotechnology; micro/nano technologies; genetic engineering; transgenic technology
● Biomedical engineering and applications: biomechatronics; biomedical electronics; biomechanics; biomaterials; biomimetics; biomedical diagnostics; biomedical therapy; biomedical devices; sensors and circuits; biomedical imaging and medical information systems; implants and regenerative medicine; neurotechnology; clinical engineering; rehabilitation engineering
● Biochemical engineering and applications: metabolic pathway engineering; modeling and simulation
● Translational bioengineering