{"title":"Computational Model for Early-Stage Aortic Valve Calcification Shows Hemodynamic Biomarkers.","authors":"Asad Mirza, Chia-Pei Denise Hsu, Andres Rodriguez, Paulina Alvarez, Lihua Lou, Matty Sey, Arvind Agarwal, Sharan Ramaswamy, Joshua Hutcheson","doi":"10.3390/bioengineering11100955","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Heart disease is a leading cause of mortality, with calcific aortic valve disease (CAVD) being the most prevalent subset. Being able to predict this disease in its early stages is important for monitoring patients before they need aortic valve replacement surgery. Thus, this study explored hydrodynamic, mechanical, and hemodynamic differences in healthy and very mildly calcified porcine small intestinal submucosa (PSIS) bioscaffold valves to determine any notable parameters between groups that could, possibly, be used for disease tracking purposes. Three valve groups were tested: raw PSIS as a control and two calcified groups that were seeded with human valvular interstitial and endothelial cells (VICs/VECs) and cultivated in calcifying media. These two calcified groups were cultured in either static or bioreactor-induced oscillatory flow conditions. Hydrodynamic assessments showed metrics were below thresholds associated for even mild calcification. Young's modulus, however, was significantly higher in calcified valves when compared to raw PSIS, indicating the morphological changes to the tissue structure. Fluid-structure interaction (FSI) simulations agreed well with hydrodynamic results and, most notably, showed a significant increase in time-averaged wall shear stress (TAWSS) between raw and calcified groups. We conclude that tracking hemodynamics may be a viable biomarker for early-stage CAVD tracking.</p>","PeriodicalId":8874,"journal":{"name":"Bioengineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11504039/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioengineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering11100955","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Heart disease is a leading cause of mortality, with calcific aortic valve disease (CAVD) being the most prevalent subset. Being able to predict this disease in its early stages is important for monitoring patients before they need aortic valve replacement surgery. Thus, this study explored hydrodynamic, mechanical, and hemodynamic differences in healthy and very mildly calcified porcine small intestinal submucosa (PSIS) bioscaffold valves to determine any notable parameters between groups that could, possibly, be used for disease tracking purposes. Three valve groups were tested: raw PSIS as a control and two calcified groups that were seeded with human valvular interstitial and endothelial cells (VICs/VECs) and cultivated in calcifying media. These two calcified groups were cultured in either static or bioreactor-induced oscillatory flow conditions. Hydrodynamic assessments showed metrics were below thresholds associated for even mild calcification. Young's modulus, however, was significantly higher in calcified valves when compared to raw PSIS, indicating the morphological changes to the tissue structure. Fluid-structure interaction (FSI) simulations agreed well with hydrodynamic results and, most notably, showed a significant increase in time-averaged wall shear stress (TAWSS) between raw and calcified groups. We conclude that tracking hemodynamics may be a viable biomarker for early-stage CAVD tracking.
期刊介绍:
Aims
Bioengineering (ISSN 2306-5354) provides an advanced forum for the science and technology of bioengineering. It publishes original research papers, comprehensive reviews, communications and case reports. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. All aspects of bioengineering are welcomed from theoretical concepts to education and applications. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. There are, in addition, four key features of this Journal:
● We are introducing a new concept in scientific and technical publications “The Translational Case Report in Bioengineering”. It is a descriptive explanatory analysis of a transformative or translational event. Understanding that the goal of bioengineering scholarship is to advance towards a transformative or clinical solution to an identified transformative/clinical need, the translational case report is used to explore causation in order to find underlying principles that may guide other similar transformative/translational undertakings.
● Manuscripts regarding research proposals and research ideas will be particularly welcomed.
● Electronic files and software regarding the full details of the calculation and experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material.
● We also accept manuscripts communicating to a broader audience with regard to research projects financed with public funds.
Scope
● Bionics and biological cybernetics: implantology; bio–abio interfaces
● Bioelectronics: wearable electronics; implantable electronics; “more than Moore” electronics; bioelectronics devices
● Bioprocess and biosystems engineering and applications: bioprocess design; biocatalysis; bioseparation and bioreactors; bioinformatics; bioenergy; etc.
● Biomolecular, cellular and tissue engineering and applications: tissue engineering; chromosome engineering; embryo engineering; cellular, molecular and synthetic biology; metabolic engineering; bio-nanotechnology; micro/nano technologies; genetic engineering; transgenic technology
● Biomedical engineering and applications: biomechatronics; biomedical electronics; biomechanics; biomaterials; biomimetics; biomedical diagnostics; biomedical therapy; biomedical devices; sensors and circuits; biomedical imaging and medical information systems; implants and regenerative medicine; neurotechnology; clinical engineering; rehabilitation engineering
● Biochemical engineering and applications: metabolic pathway engineering; modeling and simulation
● Translational bioengineering