Yuki A Sugimoto, Patrick O McKeon, Christopher K Rhea, Carl G Mattacola, Scott E Ross
{"title":"Effect of Task Constraints on Neurobiological Systems Involved in Postural Control in Individuals with and without Chronic Ankle Instability.","authors":"Yuki A Sugimoto, Patrick O McKeon, Christopher K Rhea, Carl G Mattacola, Scott E Ross","doi":"10.3390/bioengineering11100956","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of task constraints on the neurobiological systems while maintaining postural control under various sensory feedback manipulations in individuals with and without Chronic Ankle Instability (CAI). Forty-two physically active individuals, with and without CAI, were enrolled in a case-control study conducted at a biomechanics research laboratory. All participants underwent the Sensory Organization Test (SOT), which assesses individuals' ability to integrate somatosensory, visual, and vestibular feedback to maintain postural control in double-, uninjured-, and injured-limb stances under six different conditions in which variations in the sway-referenced support surface (platform) and visual surroundings, with and without vision, are manipulated to affect somatosensory and visual feedback. Center-of-Pressure (COP) path length was computed from raw data collected during trials of each SOT condition. Sample Entropy (SampEN) values were extracted from the COP path length time series to examine neurobiological systems complexity, with lower SampEN values indicating more predictable and periodic (rigid) neurobiological systems, while higher SampEN values indicate more unpredictable and random systems. The results show that specific task constraints affect the neurobiological systems. Specifically, individuals with CAI demonstrated reduced complexity (decreased SampEN values) in the neurobiological systems during the uninjured-limb stance when all sensory feedback was intact and during both uninjured- and injured-limb stances when they were forced to rely on vestibular feedback. These results highlight the interplay between sensory feedback and task constraints in individuals with CAI and suggest potential adaptations in the neurobiological systems involved in postural control.</p>","PeriodicalId":8874,"journal":{"name":"Bioengineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11504581/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioengineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering11100956","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of task constraints on the neurobiological systems while maintaining postural control under various sensory feedback manipulations in individuals with and without Chronic Ankle Instability (CAI). Forty-two physically active individuals, with and without CAI, were enrolled in a case-control study conducted at a biomechanics research laboratory. All participants underwent the Sensory Organization Test (SOT), which assesses individuals' ability to integrate somatosensory, visual, and vestibular feedback to maintain postural control in double-, uninjured-, and injured-limb stances under six different conditions in which variations in the sway-referenced support surface (platform) and visual surroundings, with and without vision, are manipulated to affect somatosensory and visual feedback. Center-of-Pressure (COP) path length was computed from raw data collected during trials of each SOT condition. Sample Entropy (SampEN) values were extracted from the COP path length time series to examine neurobiological systems complexity, with lower SampEN values indicating more predictable and periodic (rigid) neurobiological systems, while higher SampEN values indicate more unpredictable and random systems. The results show that specific task constraints affect the neurobiological systems. Specifically, individuals with CAI demonstrated reduced complexity (decreased SampEN values) in the neurobiological systems during the uninjured-limb stance when all sensory feedback was intact and during both uninjured- and injured-limb stances when they were forced to rely on vestibular feedback. These results highlight the interplay between sensory feedback and task constraints in individuals with CAI and suggest potential adaptations in the neurobiological systems involved in postural control.
本研究旨在调查任务限制对神经生物系统的影响,同时研究慢性踝关节不稳(CAI)患者和非慢性踝关节不稳患者在各种感觉反馈操作下保持姿势控制的情况。在生物力学研究实验室进行的一项病例对照研究中,有 42 名参加体育锻炼的人参加了研究,其中有的患有慢性踝关节不稳,有的则没有。所有参与者都接受了感觉组织测试(SOT),该测试评估了个人在六种不同条件下整合躯体感觉、视觉和前庭反馈以保持双肢、未受伤肢体和受伤肢体姿势控制的能力,在这些条件下,摇摆参考支撑面(平台)和视觉环境的变化(有视觉和无视觉)会影响躯体感觉和视觉反馈。压力中心(COP)路径长度是根据每个 SOT 条件试验期间收集的原始数据计算得出的。从 COP 路径长度时间序列中提取样本熵(SampEN)值来考察神经生物系统的复杂性,样本熵值越低,表明神经生物系统越具有可预测性和周期性(刚性),而样本熵值越高,表明神经生物系统越具有不可预测性和随机性。结果表明,特定的任务限制会影响神经生物系统。具体来说,当所有感觉反馈都完好无损时,患有 CAI 的个体在未受伤的肢体站立时表现出神经生物系统的复杂性降低(SampEN 值降低);当他们被迫依赖前庭反馈时,在未受伤的肢体和受伤的肢体站立时,神经生物系统的复杂性降低(SampEN 值降低)。这些结果突显了 CAI 患者的感觉反馈和任务限制之间的相互作用,并提示了姿势控制神经生物学系统的潜在适应性。
期刊介绍:
Aims
Bioengineering (ISSN 2306-5354) provides an advanced forum for the science and technology of bioengineering. It publishes original research papers, comprehensive reviews, communications and case reports. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. All aspects of bioengineering are welcomed from theoretical concepts to education and applications. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. There are, in addition, four key features of this Journal:
● We are introducing a new concept in scientific and technical publications “The Translational Case Report in Bioengineering”. It is a descriptive explanatory analysis of a transformative or translational event. Understanding that the goal of bioengineering scholarship is to advance towards a transformative or clinical solution to an identified transformative/clinical need, the translational case report is used to explore causation in order to find underlying principles that may guide other similar transformative/translational undertakings.
● Manuscripts regarding research proposals and research ideas will be particularly welcomed.
● Electronic files and software regarding the full details of the calculation and experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material.
● We also accept manuscripts communicating to a broader audience with regard to research projects financed with public funds.
Scope
● Bionics and biological cybernetics: implantology; bio–abio interfaces
● Bioelectronics: wearable electronics; implantable electronics; “more than Moore” electronics; bioelectronics devices
● Bioprocess and biosystems engineering and applications: bioprocess design; biocatalysis; bioseparation and bioreactors; bioinformatics; bioenergy; etc.
● Biomolecular, cellular and tissue engineering and applications: tissue engineering; chromosome engineering; embryo engineering; cellular, molecular and synthetic biology; metabolic engineering; bio-nanotechnology; micro/nano technologies; genetic engineering; transgenic technology
● Biomedical engineering and applications: biomechatronics; biomedical electronics; biomechanics; biomaterials; biomimetics; biomedical diagnostics; biomedical therapy; biomedical devices; sensors and circuits; biomedical imaging and medical information systems; implants and regenerative medicine; neurotechnology; clinical engineering; rehabilitation engineering
● Biochemical engineering and applications: metabolic pathway engineering; modeling and simulation
● Translational bioengineering