His Bundle Pacing and Left Bundle Branch Pacing in Patients with Heart Failure.

IF 3.9 3区 工程技术 Q2 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY Biomedicines Pub Date : 2024-10-16 DOI:10.3390/biomedicines12102356
Patrycja Paluszkiewicz, Adrian Martuszewski, Jadwiga Radziejewska, Jacek Zawadzki, Jacek Smereka, Jacek Gajek
{"title":"His Bundle Pacing and Left Bundle Branch Pacing in Patients with Heart Failure.","authors":"Patrycja Paluszkiewicz, Adrian Martuszewski, Jadwiga Radziejewska, Jacek Zawadzki, Jacek Smereka, Jacek Gajek","doi":"10.3390/biomedicines12102356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>His bundle pacing (HBP) and left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) are emerging therapies for patients with heart failure and conduction disorders, offering potential advantages over traditional pacing methods. These approaches aim to restore physiological conduction and improve cardiac function more effectively.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of HBP and LBBP in patients with heart failure and conduction disturbances, comparing these techniques to conventional pacing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive review of recent studies and clinical trials was conducted, focusing on the performance of HBP and LBBP in improving cardiac function, reducing QRS duration, and enhancing overall patient outcomes. The analysis includes data on clinical efficacy, procedural safety, and long-term benefits associated with these pacing modalities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both HBP and LBBP have demonstrated significant improvements in cardiac function and clinical outcomes compared to conventional pacing. HBP effectively restores physiological conduction with improved synchronization and a reduction in QRS duration. LBBP has shown enhanced left ventricular activation, leading to better overall cardiac performance. Both techniques have been associated with a lower incidence of complications and a higher success rate in achieving optimal pacing thresholds.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>HBP and LBBP offer promising alternatives to traditional pacing for patients with heart failure and conduction disorders. These advanced pacing strategies provide superior clinical outcomes and improved cardiac function with reduced risk of complications. Further research and clinical trials are needed to fully establish the long-term benefits and safety profiles of these techniques in diverse patient populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":8937,"journal":{"name":"Biomedicines","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11504024/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedicines","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines12102356","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: His bundle pacing (HBP) and left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) are emerging therapies for patients with heart failure and conduction disorders, offering potential advantages over traditional pacing methods. These approaches aim to restore physiological conduction and improve cardiac function more effectively.

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of HBP and LBBP in patients with heart failure and conduction disturbances, comparing these techniques to conventional pacing.

Methods: A comprehensive review of recent studies and clinical trials was conducted, focusing on the performance of HBP and LBBP in improving cardiac function, reducing QRS duration, and enhancing overall patient outcomes. The analysis includes data on clinical efficacy, procedural safety, and long-term benefits associated with these pacing modalities.

Results: Both HBP and LBBP have demonstrated significant improvements in cardiac function and clinical outcomes compared to conventional pacing. HBP effectively restores physiological conduction with improved synchronization and a reduction in QRS duration. LBBP has shown enhanced left ventricular activation, leading to better overall cardiac performance. Both techniques have been associated with a lower incidence of complications and a higher success rate in achieving optimal pacing thresholds.

Conclusions: HBP and LBBP offer promising alternatives to traditional pacing for patients with heart failure and conduction disorders. These advanced pacing strategies provide superior clinical outcomes and improved cardiac function with reduced risk of complications. Further research and clinical trials are needed to fully establish the long-term benefits and safety profiles of these techniques in diverse patient populations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心力衰竭患者的 His Bundle 起搏和左束支起搏。
背景:他束起搏(HBP)和左束支起搏(LBBP)是治疗心衰和传导障碍患者的新兴疗法,与传统起搏方法相比具有潜在优势。这些方法旨在恢复生理传导,更有效地改善心脏功能:本研究旨在评估 HBP 和 LBBP 对心衰和传导障碍患者的疗效和安全性,并将这些技术与传统起搏方法进行比较:方法: 对近期的研究和临床试验进行了全面回顾,重点关注 HBP 和 LBBP 在改善心功能、缩短 QRS 持续时间和提高患者整体疗效方面的表现。分析包括与这些起搏方式相关的临床疗效、程序安全性和长期益处的数据:结果:与传统起搏方式相比,HBP 和 LBBP 在心脏功能和临床疗效方面均有显著改善。HBP 能有效恢复生理传导,改善同步性并缩短 QRS 时程。LBBP 则增强了左心室的激活,从而改善了整体心脏功能。这两种技术的并发症发生率较低,达到最佳起搏阈值的成功率较高:HBP和LBBP为心力衰竭和传导障碍患者提供了替代传统起搏的可行方法。结论:HBP 和 LBBP 为心力衰竭和传导障碍患者提供了前景广阔的传统起搏替代方案,这些先进的起搏策略可在降低并发症风险的同时提供卓越的临床疗效并改善心脏功能。还需要进一步的研究和临床试验来充分确定这些技术在不同患者群体中的长期益处和安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Biomedicines
Biomedicines Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-General Biochemistry,Genetics and Molecular Biology
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.50%
发文量
2823
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Biomedicines (ISSN 2227-9059; CODEN: BIOMID) is an international, scientific, open access journal on biomedicines published quarterly online by MDPI.
期刊最新文献
"Hands-On" and "Hands-Off" Physiotherapy Treatments in Fibromyalgia Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Collection, Establishment and Assessment of Complex Human Osteocartilaginous Explants for Modeling Osteoarthritis. A Pilot Study of the Role of Semaphorin 4A (sema4A) and 3C (sema3C) in Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer (NMIBC). Demographic Characteristics and Survival in Young-Onset Colorectal Neuroendocrine Neoplasms. Absolute Quantitative Targeted Monitoring of Potential Plasma Protein Biomarkers: A Pilot Study on Healthy Individuals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1