Borderline personality disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder in adolescents: protocol for a comparative study of borderline personality disorder with and without comorbid post-traumatic stress disorder (BORDERSTRESS-ADO).

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY BMC Psychiatry Pub Date : 2024-10-23 DOI:10.1186/s12888-024-06093-4
Maëlle Riou, Harmony Duclos, Méline Leribillard, Jean-Jacques Parienti, Shailendra Segobin, Armelle Viard, Gisèle Apter, Priscille Gerardin, Bérengère Guillery, Fabian Guénolé
{"title":"Borderline personality disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder in adolescents: protocol for a comparative study of borderline personality disorder with and without comorbid post-traumatic stress disorder (BORDERSTRESS-ADO).","authors":"Maëlle Riou, Harmony Duclos, Méline Leribillard, Jean-Jacques Parienti, Shailendra Segobin, Armelle Viard, Gisèle Apter, Priscille Gerardin, Bérengère Guillery, Fabian Guénolé","doi":"10.1186/s12888-024-06093-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) is a prevalent and debilitating psychiatric condition often accompanied by Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), with a substantial prevalence of trauma history among affected individuals. The clinical, cognitive, and cerebral parallels shared with PTSD suggest a trauma-related etiology for BPD. Studies consistently demonstrate a reduction in hippocampal volume in individuals with BPD, echoing findings in PTSD. However, the interpretation of this shared neurobiological profile remains contentious, with ongoing debates regarding the independence of these pathologies or the potential exacerbation of diminished hippocampal volume in BPD due to concurrent PTSD. Differential impacts on hippocampal subfields across both disorders may further complicate interpretation, suggesting the volume of hippocampal subfields as a potential discriminant biomarker. This study aims to characterize the multidimensional specific and shared profiles of BPD and PTSD-related alterations, with a particular emphasis on hippocampal subfields during adolescence, a crucial period in BPD development.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study focuses on female adolescents, who are more prevalent in the BPD population. Participants are categorized into three groups: BPD, BPD with comorbid PTSD, and a control group of matched healthy individuals. Data collection encompasses clinical, cognitive, and neuroimaging domains commonly affected in both disorders, utilizing various imaging markers (including gray matter macrostructure, white matter microstructural integrity, and regional functional connectivity).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study examines adolescent BPD with and without comorbid PTSD on clinical, neuroimaging, and cognitive levels. It is the first to use a comprehensive multi-modal approach within the same sample. Additionally, it uniquely explores hippocampal subfield volume differences in adolescents. Analysis of the relationship between the investigated domains and the effects of PTSD comorbidity will elucidate specific and shared alteration profiles in both disorders.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>IDRCB number 2019-A00366-51 / clinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT0485274. Registered on 21/04/2021.</p>","PeriodicalId":9029,"journal":{"name":"BMC Psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11515767/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-024-06093-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) is a prevalent and debilitating psychiatric condition often accompanied by Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), with a substantial prevalence of trauma history among affected individuals. The clinical, cognitive, and cerebral parallels shared with PTSD suggest a trauma-related etiology for BPD. Studies consistently demonstrate a reduction in hippocampal volume in individuals with BPD, echoing findings in PTSD. However, the interpretation of this shared neurobiological profile remains contentious, with ongoing debates regarding the independence of these pathologies or the potential exacerbation of diminished hippocampal volume in BPD due to concurrent PTSD. Differential impacts on hippocampal subfields across both disorders may further complicate interpretation, suggesting the volume of hippocampal subfields as a potential discriminant biomarker. This study aims to characterize the multidimensional specific and shared profiles of BPD and PTSD-related alterations, with a particular emphasis on hippocampal subfields during adolescence, a crucial period in BPD development.

Methods: This study focuses on female adolescents, who are more prevalent in the BPD population. Participants are categorized into three groups: BPD, BPD with comorbid PTSD, and a control group of matched healthy individuals. Data collection encompasses clinical, cognitive, and neuroimaging domains commonly affected in both disorders, utilizing various imaging markers (including gray matter macrostructure, white matter microstructural integrity, and regional functional connectivity).

Discussion: This study examines adolescent BPD with and without comorbid PTSD on clinical, neuroimaging, and cognitive levels. It is the first to use a comprehensive multi-modal approach within the same sample. Additionally, it uniquely explores hippocampal subfield volume differences in adolescents. Analysis of the relationship between the investigated domains and the effects of PTSD comorbidity will elucidate specific and shared alteration profiles in both disorders.

Trial registration: IDRCB number 2019-A00366-51 / clinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT0485274. Registered on 21/04/2021.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
青少年边缘型人格障碍和创伤后应激障碍:有无合并创伤后应激障碍的边缘型人格障碍比较研究(BORDERSTRESS-ADO)方案。
背景:边缘型人格障碍(BPD)是一种普遍存在且使人衰弱的精神疾病,通常伴有创伤后应激障碍(PTSD),受影响的人中有大量的创伤史。与创伤后应激障碍在临床、认知和大脑方面的相似之处表明,BPD 的病因与创伤有关。研究一致表明,BPD 患者的海马体积缩小,这与创伤后应激障碍的研究结果一致。然而,对这一共同神经生物学特征的解释仍存在争议,人们一直在争论这些病症是否独立存在,或者创伤后应激障碍是否会加剧 BPD 患者海马体积的缩小。这两种疾病对海马亚区的不同影响可能会使解释更加复杂,这表明海马亚区的体积是一种潜在的鉴别生物标志物。本研究旨在描述BPD和创伤后应激障碍相关改变的多维特异性和共同特征,尤其侧重于青春期的海马亚区,青春期是BPD发展的关键时期:本研究的重点是女性青少年,她们在 BPD 群体中更为普遍。参与者分为三组:BPD组、合并创伤后应激障碍的BPD组,以及由匹配的健康人组成的对照组。数据收集包括临床、认知和神经影像学领域,利用各种影像学标记(包括灰质宏观结构、白质微观结构完整性和区域功能连接),这些领域通常会受到这两种疾病的影响:本研究从临床、神经影像学和认知层面研究了有创伤后应激障碍和无创伤后应激障碍的青少年BPD。这是首次在同一样本中使用多模态综合方法。此外,该研究还独特地探讨了青少年海马亚区体积的差异。对所调查领域之间的关系以及创伤后应激障碍合并症的影响进行分析,将阐明这两种疾病的特定和共同的改变特征:IDRCB 编号 2019-A00366-51 / clinicaltrials.gov ID:NCT0485274。注册日期:2021年4月21日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Psychiatry
BMC Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
716
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Psychiatry is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of psychiatric disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
期刊最新文献
Characteristics of Japanese teenage suicide attempters: a retrospective study comparing suicide attempters with young adults. Developing and testing Advance Choice Document implementation resources for Black African and Caribbean people with experience of compulsory psychiatric admission. Differential association between childhood trauma subtypes and neurocognitive performance in adults with major depression. Experiences of undergoing internet-delivered cognitive behavioural therapy for climate change-related distress: a qualitative study. Gender differences and mental distress during COVID-19: a cross-sectional study in Japan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1