Patient perspectives on knowledge gaps in hypersensitivity pneumonitis.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM BMJ Open Respiratory Research Pub Date : 2024-10-22 DOI:10.1136/bmjresp-2024-002487
Janani Varadarajan, Armani Edgar, Ronan O'Beirne, Tessy K Paul, Jamuna K Krishnan, Robert Kaner, Monika M Safford, Kerri Aronson
{"title":"Patient perspectives on knowledge gaps in hypersensitivity pneumonitis.","authors":"Janani Varadarajan, Armani Edgar, Ronan O'Beirne, Tessy K Paul, Jamuna K Krishnan, Robert Kaner, Monika M Safford, Kerri Aronson","doi":"10.1136/bmjresp-2024-002487","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Responding to prior research findings that lack of knowledge about their disease impacted patients' quality of life, the objective of this study was to identify and prioritise information gaps about hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) from the perspective of patients living with the disease.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This study used the nominal group technique, a semiquantitative and qualitative method to identify stakeholder priorities.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Virtual group sessions were conducted in an academic medical centre in the USA.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>21 patients diagnosed with HP participated in this study. Participants were eligible if they spoke English and had access to the internet and were excluded if they had cognitive impairment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The patient statements were grouped into seven themes that were prioritised by participants in the following order: (1) natural history and prognosis; (2) current treatment options and therapeutic research; (3) epidemiology and aetiology of HP; (4) living well with HP; (5) origin and management of symptoms; (6) identifying and mitigating exposures and (7) methods of educating patients, clinicians and others about HP.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides an understanding of patients' prioritisation of knowledge gaps in HP to inform targeted educational interventions and provide avenues for future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":9048,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Respiratory Research","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11499782/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Respiratory Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2024-002487","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Responding to prior research findings that lack of knowledge about their disease impacted patients' quality of life, the objective of this study was to identify and prioritise information gaps about hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) from the perspective of patients living with the disease.

Design: This study used the nominal group technique, a semiquantitative and qualitative method to identify stakeholder priorities.

Setting: Virtual group sessions were conducted in an academic medical centre in the USA.

Participants: 21 patients diagnosed with HP participated in this study. Participants were eligible if they spoke English and had access to the internet and were excluded if they had cognitive impairment.

Results: The patient statements were grouped into seven themes that were prioritised by participants in the following order: (1) natural history and prognosis; (2) current treatment options and therapeutic research; (3) epidemiology and aetiology of HP; (4) living well with HP; (5) origin and management of symptoms; (6) identifying and mitigating exposures and (7) methods of educating patients, clinicians and others about HP.

Conclusions: This study provides an understanding of patients' prioritisation of knowledge gaps in HP to inform targeted educational interventions and provide avenues for future research.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从患者角度看超敏性肺炎的知识缺口。
研究目的:以往的研究发现,缺乏对疾病的了解会影响患者的生活质量,针对这一情况,本研究旨在从超敏性肺炎(HP)患者的角度出发,确定有关该疾病的信息缺口,并对其进行优先排序:设计:本研究采用名义小组技术(一种半定量和定性的方法)来确定利益相关者的优先事项:虚拟小组会议在美国一家学术医疗中心举行。参与者:21 名确诊为 HP 的患者参与了本研究。如果患者有认知障碍,则排除在外:患者的陈述被归纳为七个主题,参与者按以下顺序排列这些主题:(1)自然病史和预后;(2)当前的治疗方案和治疗研究;(3)HP 的流行病学和病因;(4)HP 患者的良好生活;(5)症状的起源和管理;(6)识别和减少暴露;(7)对患者、临床医生和其他人进行 HP 教育的方法:本研究有助于了解患者对 HP 知识缺口的优先考虑,为有针对性的教育干预措施提供信息,并为未来研究提供途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
BMJ Open Respiratory Research RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
2.40%
发文量
95
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open Respiratory Research is a peer-reviewed, open access journal publishing respiratory and critical care medicine. It is the sister journal to Thorax and co-owned by the British Thoracic Society and BMJ. The journal focuses on robustness of methodology and scientific rigour with less emphasis on novelty or perceived impact. BMJ Open Respiratory Research operates a rapid review process, with continuous publication online, ensuring timely, up-to-date research is available worldwide. The journal publishes review articles and all research study types: Basic science including laboratory based experiments and animal models, Pilot studies or proof of concept, Observational studies, Study protocols, Registries, Clinical trials from phase I to multicentre randomised clinical trials, Systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
期刊最新文献
Firefighters' occupational exposure to air pollution: impact on COPD and asthma-study protocol. Risk factors for incidence of interstitial lung disease in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pleural effusion in acute pulmonary embolism: characteristics and relevance. Pim1 inactivating induces RUNX3 upregulation that improves/alleviates airway inflammation and mucus hypersecretion in vitro and in vivo. Agreement and comparative accuracy of instability criteria at discharge for predicting adverse events in patients with community-acquired pneumonia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1