Lack of Candida africana in Ugandan pregnant women: results from a pilot study using MALDI-ToF.

IF 1.6 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES BMC Research Notes Pub Date : 2024-10-24 DOI:10.1186/s13104-024-06973-8
Bwambale Jonani, Herman Roman Bwire, Charles Emmanuel Kasule, Gerald Mboowa
{"title":"Lack of Candida africana in Ugandan pregnant women: results from a pilot study using MALDI-ToF.","authors":"Bwambale Jonani, Herman Roman Bwire, Charles Emmanuel Kasule, Gerald Mboowa","doi":"10.1186/s13104-024-06973-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Candida africana is an emergent variant that has been listed as a new species or variety within the Candida albicans complex since 2001. It has a worldwide intra-albicans complex pooled prevalence of 1.67% and varies between 0 and 8% depending on geographical region. We present the results of a pilot study on its prevalence in Uganda.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional study between March and June 2023. We recruited 4 pregnant women from Mulago Specialized Women and Neonatal Hospital, 102 from Kawempe National Referral Hospital, and 48 from Sebbi Hospital. Vaginal swabs were tested using microscopy, culture and matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prevalence of C. africana was zero. Out of the 103 isolates, the majority (81.553%) were identified as Candida albicans, followed by Nakeseomyces glabrata (13.592%) and Pichia kudriavzevii (1.942%). Cyberlindnera jadinii, Candida tropicalis, and Candida parapsilosis each accounted for 0.971% of the isolates.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The prevalence of C. africana in Uganda is zero. However, large-scale cross-sectional studies, including studies involving the collection of vaginal samples from both urban and rural settings in Uganda and the use of both MALDI-TOF- and PCR-based laboratory methods, are needed to fully describe the public health burden of C. africana infections.</p>","PeriodicalId":9234,"journal":{"name":"BMC Research Notes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11506244/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Research Notes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-024-06973-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Candida africana is an emergent variant that has been listed as a new species or variety within the Candida albicans complex since 2001. It has a worldwide intra-albicans complex pooled prevalence of 1.67% and varies between 0 and 8% depending on geographical region. We present the results of a pilot study on its prevalence in Uganda.

Methodology: We conducted a cross-sectional study between March and June 2023. We recruited 4 pregnant women from Mulago Specialized Women and Neonatal Hospital, 102 from Kawempe National Referral Hospital, and 48 from Sebbi Hospital. Vaginal swabs were tested using microscopy, culture and matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF).

Results: The prevalence of C. africana was zero. Out of the 103 isolates, the majority (81.553%) were identified as Candida albicans, followed by Nakeseomyces glabrata (13.592%) and Pichia kudriavzevii (1.942%). Cyberlindnera jadinii, Candida tropicalis, and Candida parapsilosis each accounted for 0.971% of the isolates.

Conclusion: The prevalence of C. africana in Uganda is zero. However, large-scale cross-sectional studies, including studies involving the collection of vaginal samples from both urban and rural settings in Uganda and the use of both MALDI-TOF- and PCR-based laboratory methods, are needed to fully describe the public health burden of C. africana infections.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
乌干达孕妇体内缺乏非洲念珠菌:使用 MALDI-ToF 进行试点研究的结果。
背景:非洲念珠菌是一种新出现的变种,自 2001 年以来一直被列为白色念珠菌复合体中的一个新种或变种。它在世界范围内的白念珠菌复合体中的集中流行率为 1.67%,根据地理区域的不同,流行率在 0% 到 8% 之间。我们介绍了在乌干达对其流行情况进行试点研究的结果:我们在 2023 年 3 月至 6 月期间进行了一项横断面研究。我们在穆拉戈妇女和新生儿专科医院(Mulago Specialized Women and Neonatal Hospital)招募了 4 名孕妇,在卡文佩国家转诊医院(Kawempe National Referral Hospital)招募了 102 名孕妇,在塞比医院(Sebbi Hospital)招募了 48 名孕妇。我们使用显微镜、培养和基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间质谱(MALDI-TOF)对阴道拭子进行了检测:结果:非洲疟原虫的感染率为零。在 103 个分离株中,大多数(81.553%)被鉴定为白色念珠菌,其次是光滑奈克酵母菌(13.592%)和 Pichia kudriavzevii(1.942%)。Cyberlindnera jadinii、热带念珠菌和副丝状念珠菌各占分离株的 0.971%:结论:非洲念珠菌在乌干达的流行率为零。结论:非洲念珠菌在乌干达的流行率为零。然而,需要进行大规模的横断面研究,包括收集乌干达城市和农村地区的阴道样本,并使用 MALDI-TOF 和 PCR 实验室方法,以全面描述非洲念珠菌感染对公共卫生造成的负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Research Notes
BMC Research Notes Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (all)
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
363
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Research Notes publishes scientifically valid research outputs that cannot be considered as full research or methodology articles. We support the research community across all scientific and clinical disciplines by providing an open access forum for sharing data and useful information; this includes, but is not limited to, updates to previous work, additions to established methods, short publications, null results, research proposals and data management plans.
期刊最新文献
The abnormally increased functional connectivity of the locus coeruleus in migraine without aura patients. The bone Gla protein osteocalcin is expressed in cranial neural crest cells. Interleukin-4 and its receptor alpha in paediatric uncomplicated malaria patients from a Ghanaian case-control study. Population structure of Desmophyllum pertusum found along the United States eastern continental margin. Starch granules in algal cells play an inherent role to shape the popular SSC signal in flow cytometry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1