A Four-Gene Autophagy-Related Prognostic Model Signature and Its Association With Immune Phenotype in Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma

IF 1.5 Q4 ONCOLOGY Cancer reports Pub Date : 2024-10-23 DOI:10.1002/cnr2.70000
Lumeng Luo, Jiaying Deng, Qiu Tang
{"title":"A Four-Gene Autophagy-Related Prognostic Model Signature and Its Association With Immune Phenotype in Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma","authors":"Lumeng Luo,&nbsp;Jiaying Deng,&nbsp;Qiu Tang","doi":"10.1002/cnr2.70000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>In the era of immunotherapy, there is a critical need for effective biomarkers to improve outcome prediction and guide treatment decisions for patients with lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC). We hypothesized that the immune contexture of LUSC may be influenced by tumor intrinsic events, such as autophagy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>We aimed to develop an autophagy-related risk signature and assess its predictive value for immune phenotype.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods and Results</h3>\n \n <p>Expression profiles of autophagy-related genes (ARGs) in LUSC samples were obtained from the TCGA and GEO databases. Survival analyses were conducted to identify survival-related ARGs and construct a risk signature using the Random Forest algorithm. Four ARGs (CFLAR, RGS19, PINK1, and CTSD) with the most significant prognostic value were selected to construct the risk signature. Patients in the high-risk group exhibited worse prognosis than those in the low-risk group (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001 in TCGA; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01 in GEO) and the risk score was identified as an independent prognostic factor. We observed that the high-risk group displayed an immune-suppressive status and showed higher levels of infiltrating regulatory T cells and macrophages, which are associated with poorer outcomes. Additionally, the risk score exhibited a significantly positive correlation with the expression of PD-1 and CTLA4, as well as the estimate score and immune score.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This study provided an effective autophagy-related prognostic signature, which could also predict the immune phenotype.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":9440,"journal":{"name":"Cancer reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11499073/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cnr2.70000","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

In the era of immunotherapy, there is a critical need for effective biomarkers to improve outcome prediction and guide treatment decisions for patients with lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC). We hypothesized that the immune contexture of LUSC may be influenced by tumor intrinsic events, such as autophagy.

Aims

We aimed to develop an autophagy-related risk signature and assess its predictive value for immune phenotype.

Methods and Results

Expression profiles of autophagy-related genes (ARGs) in LUSC samples were obtained from the TCGA and GEO databases. Survival analyses were conducted to identify survival-related ARGs and construct a risk signature using the Random Forest algorithm. Four ARGs (CFLAR, RGS19, PINK1, and CTSD) with the most significant prognostic value were selected to construct the risk signature. Patients in the high-risk group exhibited worse prognosis than those in the low-risk group (p < 0.0001 in TCGA; p < 0.01 in GEO) and the risk score was identified as an independent prognostic factor. We observed that the high-risk group displayed an immune-suppressive status and showed higher levels of infiltrating regulatory T cells and macrophages, which are associated with poorer outcomes. Additionally, the risk score exhibited a significantly positive correlation with the expression of PD-1 and CTLA4, as well as the estimate score and immune score.

Conclusion

This study provided an effective autophagy-related prognostic signature, which could also predict the immune phenotype.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
四基因自噬相关预后模型特征及其与肺鳞癌免疫表型的关系
背景:在免疫疗法时代,肺鳞状细胞癌(LUSC)患者亟需有效的生物标志物来改善预后预测并指导治疗决策。我们假设肺鳞状细胞癌的免疫环境可能受到肿瘤内在事件(如自噬)的影响:我们从TCGA和GEO数据库中获得了LUSC样本中自噬相关基因(ARGs)的表达谱。采用随机森林算法进行生存分析,以确定与生存相关的ARGs并构建风险特征。研究人员选择了预后价值最显著的四个ARG(CFLAR、RGS19、PINK1和CTSD)构建风险特征。与低风险组相比,高风险组患者的预后更差(P 结论:该研究提供了一种有效的自噬基因检测方法:本研究提供了一个有效的自噬相关预后特征,它还可以预测免疫表型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer reports
Cancer reports Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
5.90%
发文量
160
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊最新文献
Analysis of Wilms Tumour Epidemiology, Clinicopathological Features and Treatment Outcomes in 84 Moroccan Patients. Definite Treatment Delay With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Longitudinal Monitoring by Circulating Tumor DNA for Advanced Cervical Cancer During Pregnancy: A Case Series and Literature Review. Impact of Age and Gender on Survival of Glioblastoma Multiforme Patients: A Multicenter Retrospective Study. Significant Pathologic Response Following Neoadjuvant Therapy and Curative Resection in Patients With Rectal Cancer: Surgical and Oncological Outcomes From a Retrospective Cohort Study. Total Minimally Invasive Curative Staged Resections After Induction Systemic Therapy for Metastatic Rectal Cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1