Association Between Thrombus Histopathology and Hemodynamic Outcomes Among Patients With Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension Undergoing Pulmonary Endarterectomy.

IF 9.5 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Chest Pub Date : 2024-10-23 DOI:10.1016/j.chest.2024.10.018
Louisa A Mounsey, Daniel Alape Moya, Cameron Wright, Nathaniel Langer, James R Stone, Richard Channick, Alexandra K Wong, Josanna Rodriguez-Lopez, Alison S Witkin
{"title":"Association Between Thrombus Histopathology and Hemodynamic Outcomes Among Patients With Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension Undergoing Pulmonary Endarterectomy.","authors":"Louisa A Mounsey, Daniel Alape Moya, Cameron Wright, Nathaniel Langer, James R Stone, Richard Channick, Alexandra K Wong, Josanna Rodriguez-Lopez, Alison S Witkin","doi":"10.1016/j.chest.2024.10.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) is the treatment of choice for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). Although most have normalization of pulmonary artery (PA) pressures, development of residual pulmonary hypertension (RPH) is challenging to predict.</p><p><strong>Research question: </strong>Among patients with CTEPH undergoing PEA, is there a relationship between specimen histopathology and postoperative hemodynamics?</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>In this single-center retrospective cohort study, patients with CTEPH who underwent PEA were classified by thrombus chronicity: organized (chronic), organizing (subacute), or mixed (combined organizing and organized). Change in mean PA pressure, pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR), and transpulmonary gradient (TPG) were examined by thrombus organization. Associations with RPH were assessed with multivariable logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 163 patients were identified: 34% had organized thrombi, 17% had organizing thrombi, and 49% had mixed thrombi. Pre-PEA mean TPG and PVR were highest in the mixed group (TPG: 37 mm Hg [29-42]; PVR: 8.7 Wood units [interquartile range (IQR), 5.6-11.2]) compared with the organized (TPG: 30 mm Hg [24-38]; PVR: 6.2 Wood units [IQR, 4.2-8.8]) and organizing (TPG: 24 mm Hg [19-37]; PVR: 4.2 Wood units [IQR, 3.5-9.2]) groups (TPG: P = .05; PVR: P = .01). The adjusted change in mean PA pressure among the mixed group was -19.8 mm Hg (-21.7 to -17.8), significantly greater than -16.2 mm Hg (-18.4 to -14.1) in the organized group and -14.1 mm Hg (-17.3 to -10.9) in the organizing group (P = .004). Fifty-two patients (32%) had RPH. Mixed thrombus organization was associated with lower odds of RPH (OR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.14-0.85; P = .02), whereas preoperative mean PA pressure (OR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.06-1.16; P < .001) and age (OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.01-1.07; P = .02) were associated with higher odds of RPH.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Patients with mixed thrombi were less likely to have RPH, suggesting there may be an optimum time to perform PEA after the clot has mostly organized, but prior to development of irreversible small vessel disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":9782,"journal":{"name":"Chest","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chest","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2024.10.018","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) is the treatment of choice for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). Although most have normalization of pulmonary artery (PA) pressures, development of residual pulmonary hypertension (RPH) is challenging to predict.

Research question: Among patients with CTEPH undergoing PEA, is there a relationship between specimen histopathology and postoperative hemodynamics?

Study design and methods: In this single-center retrospective cohort study, patients with CTEPH who underwent PEA were classified by thrombus chronicity: organized (chronic), organizing (subacute), or mixed (combined organizing and organized). Change in mean PA pressure, pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR), and transpulmonary gradient (TPG) were examined by thrombus organization. Associations with RPH were assessed with multivariable logistic regression.

Results: A total of 163 patients were identified: 34% had organized thrombi, 17% had organizing thrombi, and 49% had mixed thrombi. Pre-PEA mean TPG and PVR were highest in the mixed group (TPG: 37 mm Hg [29-42]; PVR: 8.7 Wood units [interquartile range (IQR), 5.6-11.2]) compared with the organized (TPG: 30 mm Hg [24-38]; PVR: 6.2 Wood units [IQR, 4.2-8.8]) and organizing (TPG: 24 mm Hg [19-37]; PVR: 4.2 Wood units [IQR, 3.5-9.2]) groups (TPG: P = .05; PVR: P = .01). The adjusted change in mean PA pressure among the mixed group was -19.8 mm Hg (-21.7 to -17.8), significantly greater than -16.2 mm Hg (-18.4 to -14.1) in the organized group and -14.1 mm Hg (-17.3 to -10.9) in the organizing group (P = .004). Fifty-two patients (32%) had RPH. Mixed thrombus organization was associated with lower odds of RPH (OR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.14-0.85; P = .02), whereas preoperative mean PA pressure (OR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.06-1.16; P < .001) and age (OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.01-1.07; P = .02) were associated with higher odds of RPH.

Interpretation: Patients with mixed thrombi were less likely to have RPH, suggesting there may be an optimum time to perform PEA after the clot has mostly organized, but prior to development of irreversible small vessel disease.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
接受肺动脉内膜剥脱术的慢性血栓栓塞性肺动脉高压患者的血栓组织病理学与血液动力学结果之间的关系。
背景:肺动脉内膜剥脱术(PEA)是治疗慢性血栓栓塞性肺动脉高压(CTEPH)的首选方法。虽然大多数患者的肺动脉(PA)压力恢复正常,但残余肺动脉高压(RPH)的发展却难以预测:研究问题:在接受 PEA 的 CTEPH 患者中,标本组织病理学与术后血流动力学之间是否存在关系?在这项单中心回顾性队列研究中,接受 PEA 的 CTEPH 患者按血栓的慢性程度分类:有组织(慢性)、有组织(亚急性)或混合(合并有组织和有组织)。根据血栓组织对平均 PA 压力、肺血管阻力 (PVR) 和跨肺梯度 (TPG) 的变化进行研究。通过多变量逻辑回归评估与 RPH 的关系:结果:共确定了 163 名患者:34%的患者有组织血栓,17%的患者有组织血栓,49%的患者有混合血栓。与有组织血栓组(TPG:30 mm Hg [24-38];PVR:6.2伍德单位[IQR,4.2-8.8])和有组织组(TPG:24 mm Hg [19-37];PVR:4.2伍德单位[IQR,3.5-9.2])相比(TPG:P = .05;PVR:P = .01)。混合组平均 PA 压力的调整后变化为-19.8 毫米汞柱(-21.7 至-17.8),明显高于有组织组的-16.2 毫米汞柱(-18.4 至-14.1)和有组织组的-14.1 毫米汞柱(-17.3 至-10.9)(P = .004)。52名患者(32%)患有RPH。混合血栓组织与较低的RPH几率相关(OR,0.35;95% CI,0.14-0.85;P = .02),而术前平均PA压力(OR,1.10;95% CI,1.06-1.16;P < .001)和年龄(OR,1.04;95% CI,1.01-1.07;P = .02)与较高的RPH几率相关:混合血栓患者发生 RPH 的几率较低,这表明在血栓基本组织化之后、发生不可逆的小血管疾病之前,可能是进行 PEA 的最佳时机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Chest
Chest 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
3.10%
发文量
3369
审稿时长
15 days
期刊介绍: At CHEST, our mission is to revolutionize patient care through the collaboration of multidisciplinary clinicians in the fields of pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine. We achieve this by publishing cutting-edge clinical research that addresses current challenges and brings forth future advancements. To enhance understanding in a rapidly evolving field, CHEST also features review articles, commentaries, and facilitates discussions on emerging controversies. We place great emphasis on scientific rigor, employing a rigorous peer review process, and ensuring all accepted content is published online within two weeks.
期刊最新文献
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease-associated expiratory central airway collapse: current concepts and new perspectives. Evolution of DLCO in LAM: Historical Perspectives and the Role of Advanced Imaging. Plasma Protein Biomarkers of Spirometry Measures of Impaired Lung Function. Keeping up with technological innovation: the moral imperative for pragmatic clinical trials in interventional pulmonology. Dietary pattern, sputum DNA methylation, and lung health: an epidemiological study in people who ever smoked.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1