Bioequivalence and Pharmacokinetic Evaluation of Regorafenib Tablets in Healthy Chinese Volunteers

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development Pub Date : 2024-10-23 DOI:10.1002/cpdd.1474
Zhaoyu Wang, Yun Zhang, Jingjing Liu, Xijing Chen
{"title":"Bioequivalence and Pharmacokinetic Evaluation of Regorafenib Tablets in Healthy Chinese Volunteers","authors":"Zhaoyu Wang,&nbsp;Yun Zhang,&nbsp;Jingjing Liu,&nbsp;Xijing Chen","doi":"10.1002/cpdd.1474","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This was a single-center, randomized, open-label, 2-formulation, and 2-cycle crossover trial conducted in 48 healthy Chinese volunteers, under fasting and fed conditions. The participants received oral doses of the test formulation (regorafenib) and reference formulation (40 mg) during each study period. Blood samples were collected before and up to 144 hours after the formulations were administered to determine changes in the pharmacokinetic parameters and adverse reactions, which were then used to evaluate bioequivalence and safety. The geometric mean ratios of maximum blood concentration, area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to the last quantifiable concentration<sub>,</sub> and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity for regorafenib were as follows: 94.7%, 91.4%, and 91.7%, respectively, under fasting conditions; and 94.6%, 97.7%, and 98.8%, respectively, under fed conditions. The 90% confidence intervals for the geometric mean ratios were within the 80%-125% equivalence interval for both the fasting and fed tests. Ingesting high-fat and high-calorie foods increases exposure to regorafenib, leading to slower rates of absorption. The safety profiles of the 2 preparations were similar.</p>","PeriodicalId":10495,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","volume":"13 12","pages":"1317-1323"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpdd.1474","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This was a single-center, randomized, open-label, 2-formulation, and 2-cycle crossover trial conducted in 48 healthy Chinese volunteers, under fasting and fed conditions. The participants received oral doses of the test formulation (regorafenib) and reference formulation (40 mg) during each study period. Blood samples were collected before and up to 144 hours after the formulations were administered to determine changes in the pharmacokinetic parameters and adverse reactions, which were then used to evaluate bioequivalence and safety. The geometric mean ratios of maximum blood concentration, area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to the last quantifiable concentration, and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity for regorafenib were as follows: 94.7%, 91.4%, and 91.7%, respectively, under fasting conditions; and 94.6%, 97.7%, and 98.8%, respectively, under fed conditions. The 90% confidence intervals for the geometric mean ratios were within the 80%-125% equivalence interval for both the fasting and fed tests. Ingesting high-fat and high-calorie foods increases exposure to regorafenib, leading to slower rates of absorption. The safety profiles of the 2 preparations were similar.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
瑞戈非尼片在中国健康志愿者中的生物等效性和药代动力学评价
这是一项单中心、随机、开放标签、两种制剂、两个周期的交叉试验,在空腹和进食条件下对48名健康的中国志愿者进行了试验。参与者在每个研究期间分别口服试验制剂(瑞戈非尼)和参比制剂(40 毫克)。在给药前和给药后 144 小时内采集血样,以确定药代动力学参数的变化和不良反应,然后用于评价生物等效性和安全性。瑞戈非尼的最大血药浓度、从时间 0 到最后一次可定量浓度的血浆浓度-时间曲线下面积以及从时间 0 到无穷大的血浆浓度-时间曲线下面积的几何平均比如下:94.7%、91.4%、91.4%、91.4%:空腹条件下分别为 94.7%、91.4% 和 91.7%;进食条件下分别为 94.6%、97.7% 和 98.8%。在空腹和进食测试中,几何平均比的 90% 置信区间均在 80%-125% 的等效区间内。摄入高脂肪和高热量食物会增加瑞戈非尼的暴露量,导致吸收速度减慢。两种制剂的安全性相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
154
期刊介绍: Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development is an international, peer-reviewed, online publication focused on publishing high-quality clinical pharmacology studies in drug development which are primarily (but not exclusively) performed in early development phases in healthy subjects.
期刊最新文献
Determination of the Bioavailability of 3 Intranasal Formulations of Azelastine Hydrochloride in Healthy Male Volunteers. Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling of Certepetide in Human Subjects With Metastatic Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. A Comparative Analysis of the Pharmacodynamic and Pharmacokinetic Properties of 2 Controlled-Release Formulations Versus a Marketed Orlistat Product. Bioequivalence Study of 2 Formulations of Fluticasone Nasal Spray in Healthy Chinese Volunteers. Impact of Sotorasib, a KRAS G12C Inhibitor, on the Pharmacokinetics and Therapeutic Window of Digoxin, a P-Glycoprotein Substrate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1